Guo Hui-Qin, Wei Wen-Qiang, Lu Ning, Cao Jian, Li Zhong-Lin, Wang Nai-Peng, Wang Guo-Qing, Pan Qin-Jing, Qiao You-Lin
Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital (Institute), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100021, P. R. China.
Ai Zheng. 2009 Dec;28(12):1243-7. doi: 10.5732/cjc.009.10166.
Cytologic screening of asymptomatic high risk individuals can detect curable esophageal carcinomas and has been used for several decades. However, the sensitivity of such screening is relatively low, which limits its wide use and development. This study was to investigate the utility of liquid-based cytology in esophageal carcinoma screening.
A mass screening of esophageal carcinoma was performed for asymptomatic residents in Yaocun County, Linzhou City, Henan Province, China. Esophageal biopsy samples were put into a liquid buffer for cytologic diagnosis and subsequent endoscopic biopsies were made on all subjects. Cytologic categories were adapted from criteria of the Bethesda system (TBS). RESULTS of liquid-based cytology were compared with those from endoscopic biopsy. The sensitivity and the specificity of liquid-based cytology were evaluated.
Carcinomas in situ and carcinomas were identified in 17 (2.4%) of 710 subjects. Measured by ASC/AGC (atypical squamous cells or atypical glandular cells) as the detection threshold, the sensitivity and the specificity of liquid-based cytology were 76.5% and 76.0%, respectively.
In a hospital with a high level of conventional cytology, liquid-based technique can be used widely since the work load of reading slides may greatly decrease, although this technique do not significantly improve the sensitivity of screening.
对无症状高危个体进行细胞学筛查可检测出可治愈的食管癌,且该方法已应用数十年。然而,这种筛查的敏感性相对较低,限制了其广泛应用与发展。本研究旨在探讨液基细胞学在食管癌筛查中的应用价值。
对中国河南省林州市姚村乡的无症状居民进行食管癌大规模筛查。将食管活检样本置于液体缓冲液中进行细胞学诊断,随后对所有受试者进行内镜活检。细胞学分类采用贝塞斯达系统(TBS)标准。将液基细胞学结果与内镜活检结果进行比较,评估液基细胞学的敏感性和特异性。
710名受试者中有17名(2.4%)被诊断为原位癌和癌。以非典型鳞状细胞或非典型腺细胞(ASC/AGC)作为检测阈值,液基细胞学的敏感性和特异性分别为76.5%和76.0%。
在传统细胞学水平较高的医院,液基技术可广泛应用,因为读片工作量可能会大幅减少,尽管该技术并未显著提高筛查的敏感性。