Roth M J, Liu S F, Dawsey S M, Zhou B, Copeland C, Wang G Q, Solomon D, Baker S G, Giffen C A, Taylor P R
Cancer Prevention Studies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Cancer. 1997 Dec 1;80(11):2047-59. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971201)80:11<2047::aid-cncr3>3.0.co;2-u.
The principal reason for the poor prognosis of esophageal carcinoma is that most tumors are asymptomatic and go undetected until they are unresectable. Previous studies have shown that cytologic screening of asymptomatic high risk individuals can detect curable esophageal carcinomas and precursor lesions, but the sensitivity of such screening is not well documented. The current study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of currently available balloon and sponge cytologic samplers for detecting biopsy-proven squamous dysplasia and carcinoma in asymptomatic individuals from a high risk population in Linxian, China.
Asymptomatic adults were examined with both balloon and sponge samplers, in random order, followed by endoscopy with mucosal iodine staining and biopsy of all unstained lesions. The cytology slides were interpreted using the criteria of the Bethesda System. The balloon and sponge cytologic diagnoses (test) were compared with the biopsy diagnosis (truth) in each patient to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of each sampler.
Of the 439 patients with adequate biopsies, 123 (28%) had histologic squamous dysplasia and 16 (4%) had an invasive squamous carcinoma. The sensitivities/specificities of the balloon and sponge were 44%/99% and 18%/100%, respectively, for detecting biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma, and 47%/81% and 24%/92%, respectively, for identifying squamous dysplasia or carcinoma.
In this study, the balloon sampler was more sensitive than the sponge sampler for detecting esophageal squamous disease, but both techniques were less than optimal. Improved samplers and/or cytologic criteria should increase the sensitivities observed in this baseline study.
食管癌预后较差的主要原因是大多数肿瘤无症状,直到无法切除时才被发现。既往研究表明,对无症状高危个体进行细胞学筛查可检测出可治愈的食管癌及癌前病变,但此类筛查的敏感性尚无充分记录。本研究评估了目前可用的球囊和海绵细胞学采样器对中国林县高危人群中无症状个体经活检证实的鳞状上皮发育异常和癌的检测敏感性及特异性。
对无症状成年人依次随机使用球囊和海绵采样器进行检查,随后进行内镜黏膜碘染色,并对所有未染色病变进行活检。细胞学涂片依据贝塞斯达系统标准进行判读。将每位患者的球囊和海绵细胞学诊断(检测结果)与活检诊断(真实情况)进行比较,以评估每个采样器的敏感性和特异性。
在439例活检充分的患者中,123例(28%)有组织学鳞状上皮发育异常,16例(4%)有浸润性鳞状细胞癌。球囊和海绵采样器检测经活检证实的鳞状细胞癌的敏感性/特异性分别为44%/99%和18%/100%,识别鳞状上皮发育异常或癌的敏感性/特异性分别为47%/81%和24%/92%。
在本研究中,球囊采样器在检测食管鳞状病变方面比海绵采样器更敏感,但两种技术均未达到最佳效果。改进采样器和/或细胞学标准应能提高本基线研究中观察到的敏感性。