• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马法兰 200mg/m(2)与马法兰 100mg/m(2)治疗初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者的前瞻性、多中心 3 期研究。

Melphalan 200 mg/m(2) versus melphalan 100 mg/m(2) in newly diagnosed myeloma patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 3 study.

机构信息

Divisione di Ematologia dell'Università di Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S Giovanni Battista, Via Genova 3, 10126 Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Blood. 2010 Mar 11;115(10):1873-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-09-241737. Epub 2009 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1182/blood-2009-09-241737
PMID:19965659
Abstract

High-dose (200 mg/m(2), MEL200) and intermediate-dose melphalan (100 mg/m(2), MEL100) showed significant activity in myeloma. In a phase 3 study, 298 patients were randomly assigned to receive 2 autologous transplantations after conditioning with MEL200 or MEL100. Ninety-six of 149 (64%) completed MEL200 and 103 of 149 (69%) MEL100. Best response to MEL200 was: complete remission 22 of 149 (15%); partial remission 95 of 149 (64%), for an overall response rate of 79%. Best response to MEL100 was: complete remission 12 of 149 (8%); partial remission 95 of 149 (64%), for an overall response rate of 72%. Overall survival did not differ (P = .13); median progression-free survival (31.4 vs 26.2 months, P = .01), median time to progression (34.4 vs 27.0 months, P = .014) were longer in the MEL200. Treatment-related mortality was 3.1% in the MEL200 and 2.9% in the MEL100 group. Severe neutropenia and infections were marginally superior, whereas severe thrombocytopenia, mucositis, gastrointestinal adverse events, and the overall occurrence of at least 1 nonhematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse event were significantly higher in the MEL200 cohort. We conclude that MEL200 leads to longer remission duration and should be considered the standard conditioning regimen for autologous transplantation. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00950768.

摘要

高剂量(200 毫克/平方米,MEL200)和中剂量美法仑(100 毫克/平方米,MEL100)在骨髓瘤中表现出显著的活性。在一项 3 期研究中,298 名患者被随机分配接受 2 次自体移植,条件为 MEL200 或 MEL100。149 名患者中的 96 名(64%)完成了 MEL200,149 名患者中的 103 名(69%)完成了 MEL100。MEL200 的最佳反应为:完全缓解 149 例中的 22 例(15%);部分缓解 149 例中的 95 例(64%),总反应率为 79%。MEL100 的最佳反应为:完全缓解 149 例中的 12 例(8%);部分缓解 149 例中的 95 例(64%),总反应率为 72%。总生存无差异(P=.13);无进展生存期(31.4 对 26.2 个月,P=.01)和进展时间(34.4 对 27.0 个月,P=.014)在 MEL200 组更长。MEL200 组的治疗相关死亡率为 3.1%,MEL100 组为 2.9%。严重中性粒细胞减少和感染略有优势,而严重血小板减少、黏膜炎、胃肠道不良事件以及至少发生 1 次非血液学 3 级或 4 级不良事件的总体发生率在 MEL200 组显著升高。我们得出结论,MEL200 导致缓解持续时间更长,应被视为自体移植的标准条件方案。该研究在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册为 #NCT00950768。

相似文献

1
Melphalan 200 mg/m(2) versus melphalan 100 mg/m(2) in newly diagnosed myeloma patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 3 study.马法兰 200mg/m(2)与马法兰 100mg/m(2)治疗初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者的前瞻性、多中心 3 期研究。
Blood. 2010 Mar 11;115(10):1873-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-09-241737. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
2
Multiple myeloma: comparison of two dose-intensive melphalan regimens (100 vs 200 mg/m(2)).多发性骨髓瘤:两种大剂量美法仑方案(100 与 200 mg/m²)的比较
Leukemia. 2004 Jan;18(1):133-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403196.
3
Intravenous busulfan and melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a matched comparison to a melphalan-only approach.静脉注射白消安和马法兰作为新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者自体干细胞移植的预处理方案:与仅用马法兰方案的匹配比较。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jan;19(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
4
Dose-intensive melphalan with stem cell support (MEL100) is superior to standard treatment in elderly myeloma patients.在老年骨髓瘤患者中,采用干细胞支持的大剂量美法仑治疗方案(MEL100)优于标准治疗。
Blood. 1999 Aug 15;94(4):1248-53.
5
Comparison of 200 mg/m(2) melphalan and 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m(2) melphalan as conditioning regimens for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome 9502 randomized trial.200mg/m²美法仑与8Gy全身照射加140mg/m²美法仑作为新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者外周血干细胞移植预处理方案的比较:法语国家骨髓瘤研究组9502随机试验的最终分析
Blood. 2002 Feb 1;99(3):731-5. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.3.731.
6
Full or intensity-reduced high-dose melphalan and single or double autologous stem cell transplant with or without bortezomib consolidation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者采用全剂量或强度降低的大剂量美法仑联合或不联合硼替佐米巩固治疗,行单或双次自体干细胞移植。
Eur J Haematol. 2021 Nov;107(5):529-542. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13690. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
7
Combined submyeloablative and myeloablative dose intense melphalan results in satisfactory responses with acceptable toxicity in patients with multiple myeloma.联合亚致死剂量和致死剂量强化美法仑治疗多发性骨髓瘤可获得满意的缓解,且毒性可接受。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Oct;16(10):1402-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
8
Myeloablative treatments for multiple myeloma: update of a comparative study of different regimens used in patients from the Spanish registry for transplantation in multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤的清髓性治疗:西班牙多发性骨髓瘤移植登记处患者使用的不同方案比较研究的更新
Leuk Lymphoma. 2002 Jan;43(1):67-74. doi: 10.1080/10428190210194.
9
Intermediate-dose melphalan improves survival of myeloma patients aged 50 to 70: results of a randomized controlled trial.中等剂量美法仑可提高50至70岁骨髓瘤患者的生存率:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Blood. 2004 Nov 15;104(10):3052-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-02-0408. Epub 2004 Jul 20.
10
A Phase IIb, Multicenter, Open-Label, Safety, and Efficacy Study of High-Dose, Propylene Glycol-Free Melphalan Hydrochloride for Injection (EVOMELA) for Myeloablative Conditioning in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Transplantation.一项关于注射用高剂量、无丙二醇美法仑(EVOMELA)用于接受自体移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者清髓预处理的IIb期、多中心、开放标签、安全性和有效性研究。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Dec;21(12):2100-2105. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.08.026. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective Study to Compare Outcomes in 159 Patients Undergoing First Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma Treated with Melphalan 140 mg/m² or 200 mg/m².一项回顾性研究,比较159例接受美法仑140mg/m²或200mg/m²治疗的骨髓瘤患者首次自体干细胞移植的结局。
Ann Transplant. 2025 Feb 11;30:e947186. doi: 10.12659/AOT.947186.
2
Bortezomib With High-dose Melphalan Conditioning Regimen in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Long-term Follow-up.硼替佐米联合大剂量美法仑预处理方案用于新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者:长期随访
In Vivo. 2025 Jan-Feb;39(1):340-345. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13833.
3
Clinical factors associated with autologous stem cell transplantation outcomes in multiple myeloma: upfront transplant with MEL200 remains the standard of care.
与多发性骨髓瘤自体干细胞移植结果相关的临床因素:采用MEL200进行前期移植仍是治疗标准。
Ann Hematol. 2024 Jan;103(1):269-283. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05511-z. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
4
Country Report: The Report of Transplant Activity and Outcome During the First 12 Months at the First National Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Center in Sri Lanka.国家报告:斯里兰卡首个国家造血干细胞移植中心头12个月的移植活动及结果报告。
Blood Cell Ther. 2019 Nov 25;2(4):50-53. doi: 10.31547/bct-2019-007.
5
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) outcome for multiple myeloma in a tertiary referral centre in Malaysia.马来西亚一家三级转诊中心的多发性骨髓瘤自体干细胞移植(ASCT)结果。
Blood Cell Ther. 2020 Dec 4;4(1):1-8. doi: 10.31547/bct-2020-009. eCollection 2021 Feb 25.
6
Adding bendamustine to melphalan before ASCT improves CR rate in myeloma vs. melphalan alone: A randomized phase-2 trial.在 ASCT 前加入苯达莫司汀可提高骨髓瘤患者的 CR 率,优于单用美法仑:一项随机 2 期试验。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022 Jun;57(6):990-997. doi: 10.1038/s41409-022-01681-y. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
7
Genome Instability in Multiple Myeloma: Facts and Factors.多发性骨髓瘤中的基因组不稳定:事实与因素
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 26;13(23):5949. doi: 10.3390/cancers13235949.
8
Melphalan dose intensity for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.美法仑剂量强度在多发性骨髓瘤自体干细胞移植中的应用
Haematologica. 2021 Dec 1;106(12):3211-3214. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279179.
9
Pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in multiple myeloma.培非格司亭用于多发性骨髓瘤的发热性中性粒细胞减少症的初级预防。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6973-6980. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06266-x. Epub 2021 May 14.
10
Translational model of melphalan-induced gut toxicity reveals drug-host-microbe interactions that drive tissue injury and fever.美法仑诱导的肠道毒性转化模型揭示了药物-宿主-微生物相互作用,这些相互作用导致组织损伤和发热。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021 Aug;88(2):173-188. doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04273-7. Epub 2021 Apr 20.