• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格、社会经济地位与美国全因死亡率

Personality, socioeconomic status, and all-cause mortality in the United States.

机构信息

University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box PSYCH, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Jan 1;171(1):83-92. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp323. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwp323
PMID:19965888
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2800299/
Abstract

The authors assessed the extent to which socioeconomic status (SES) and the personality factors termed the "big 5" (neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness) represented confounded or independent risks for all-cause mortality over a 10-year follow-up in the Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS) cohort between 1995 and 2004. Adjusted for demographics, the 25th versus 75th percentile of SES was associated with an odds ratio of 1.43 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11, 1.83). Demographic-adjusted odds ratios for the 75th versus 25th percentile of neuroticism were 1.38 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.73) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.84) for conscientiousness, the latter evaluated at high levels of agreeableness. Modest associations were observed between SES and the big 5. Adjusting each for the other revealed that personality explained roughly 20% of the SES gradient in mortality, while SES explained 8% of personality risk. Portions of SES and personality risk were explained by health behaviors, although some residual risk remained unexplained. Personality appears to explain some between-SES strata differences in mortality risk, as well as some individual risk heterogeneity within SES strata. Findings suggest that both sociostructural inequalities and individual disposition hold public health implications. Future research and prevention aimed at ameliorating SES health disparities may benefit from considering the risk clustering of social disadvantage and dispositional factors.

摘要

作者评估了社会经济地位(SES)和被称为“大五”(神经质、外向性、开放性、宜人性、尽责性)的人格因素在多大程度上代表了混杂或独立的风险,这些风险与 1995 年至 2004 年间美国中年发展(MIDUS)队列中 10 年全因死亡率有关。在调整了人口统计学因素后,SES 的第 25 百分位与第 75 百分位的比值为 1.43(95%置信区间(CI):1.11,1.83)。神经质的第 75 百分位与第 25 百分位的人口统计学调整比值分别为 1.38(95%CI:1.10,1.73)和 0.63(95%CI:0.47,0.84),而尽责性则评估为高度宜人性。SES 与“大五”之间存在适度关联。对每个因素进行调整后发现,人格因素大约解释了 SES 梯度死亡率差异的 20%,而 SES 解释了人格风险的 8%。健康行为解释了 SES 和人格风险的一部分,但仍有一些剩余风险无法解释。人格似乎解释了 SES 分层死亡率风险之间的一些差异,以及 SES 分层内的一些个体风险异质性。研究结果表明,社会结构不平等和个体倾向都对公共卫生具有重要意义。未来旨在改善 SES 健康差异的研究和预防工作可能受益于考虑社会劣势和性格因素的风险聚集。

相似文献

1
Personality, socioeconomic status, and all-cause mortality in the United States.人格、社会经济地位与美国全因死亡率
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Jan 1;171(1):83-92. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp323. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
2
Socioeconomic Status Interacts with Conscientiousness and Neuroticism to Predict Circulating Concentrations of Inflammatory Markers.社会经济地位与尽责性和神经质相互作用,以预测炎症标志物的循环浓度。
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Apr;51(2):240-250. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9847-z.
3
The effects of socioeconomic status on personality development in adulthood and aging.社会经济地位对成年人和老年期人格发展的影响。
J Pers. 2024 Feb;92(1):243-260. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12801. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
4
Can the influence of childhood socioeconomic status on men's and women's adult body mass be explained by adult socioeconomic status or personality? Findings from a national sample.童年社会经济地位对男性和女性成年后体重的影响能否由成年后的社会经济地位或性格来解释?来自全国样本的研究结果。
Health Psychol. 2009 Jul;28(4):419-27. doi: 10.1037/a0015212.
5
High school personality traits and 48-year all-cause mortality risk: results from a national sample of 26 845 baby boomers.高中生个性特征与 48 年全因死亡率风险:来自 26845 名生育高峰期人群的全国样本研究结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Feb;73(2):106-110. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211076. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
6
Neuroticism and cardiovascular disease mortality: socioeconomic status modifies the risk in women (UK Health and Lifestyle Survey).神经质与心血管疾病死亡率:社会经济地位改变了女性的风险(英国健康与生活方式调查)。
Psychosom Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;74(6):596-603. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31825c85ca. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
7
Personality and smoking: individual-participant meta-analysis of nine cohort studies.人格与吸烟:九项队列研究的个体参与者荟萃分析
Addiction. 2015 Nov;110(11):1844-52. doi: 10.1111/add.13079. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
8
Personality and all-cause mortality among older adults dwelling in a Japanese community: a five-year population-based prospective cohort study.日本社区老年人的人格与全因死亡率:一项基于人群的五年前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 May;16(5):399-405. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181662ac9. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
9
Association of socioeconomic status with functional capacity, heart rate recovery, and all-cause mortality.社会经济地位与功能能力、心率恢复及全因死亡率的关联。
JAMA. 2006 Feb 15;295(7):784-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.7.784.
10
Low life course socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with negative NEO PI-R personality patterns.低人生历程社会经济地位(SES)与消极的 NEO PI-R 人格模式有关。
Int J Behav Med. 2011 Mar;18(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s12529-009-9069-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Hit me with your best puff: Personality predicts preference for cigar vs. cigarette smoking.向我展示你最好的论点:个性预测对雪茄和香烟吸烟的偏好。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 3;19(7):e0305634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305634. eCollection 2024.
2
Role of personal aptitudes as determinants of incident morbidity, lifestyles, quality of life, use of health services, and mortality (DESVELA cohort): quantitative study protocol for a prospective cohort study in a hybrid analysis.个人特质作为发病风险、生活方式、生活质量、卫生服务利用和死亡率决定因素的作用(DESVELA 队列):前瞻性队列研究的定量研究方案,采用混合分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 22;11:1067249. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1067249. eCollection 2023.
3
Role of personal aptitudes as determinants of incident morbidity, lifestyles, quality of life, use of the health services and mortality (DESVELA cohort): qualitative study protocol for a prospective cohort study in a hybrid analysis.个人特质在发病、生活方式、生活质量、卫生服务利用和死亡率方面的决定作用(DESVELA 队列):一项前瞻性队列研究的定性研究方案,采用混合分析方法。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 9;11:1069957. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1069957. eCollection 2023.
4
Direct and indirect links between children's socio-economic status and education: pathways via mental health, attitude, and cognition.儿童社会经济地位与教育之间的直接和间接联系:通过心理健康、态度和认知的途径。
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(12):9637-9651. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02232-2. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
5
The relationship of trait-like compassion with epigenetic aging: The population-based prospective Young Finns Study.特质性同情心与表观遗传衰老的关系:基于人群的前瞻性芬兰青年研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 18;14:1018797. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1018797. eCollection 2023.
6
Investigating Racial Differences in Allostatic Load by Educational Attainment among Non-Hispanic Black and White Men.按受教育程度调查非西班牙裔黑人和白人男性间的应激负荷种族差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 30;19(9):5486. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095486.
7
Preliminary Support of a Behavioral Intervention for Trait Conscientiousness in Multiple Sclerosis.对多发性硬化症患者特质尽责性进行行为干预的初步支持。
Int J MS Care. 2022 Mar-Apr;24(2):45-53. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2021-005. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
8
Comparative study of two birth cohorts: did the explanatory role of behavioural, social and psychological factors in educational inequalities in mortality change over time?两组人群的对比研究:行为、社会和心理因素在死亡率方面的教育不平等的解释作用是否随时间发生了变化?
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 8;12(3):e052204. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052204.
9
Pathways From Early-Life SES to Dementia Risk in Old Age: The Role of Personality.从早年社会经济地位到老年痴呆症风险的途径:人格的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 May 5;77(5):850-859. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab159.
10
The power of personality in successful ageing: a comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies.成功老龄化中个性的力量:对大型定量研究的全面综述
Eur J Ageing. 2020 Jul 19;18(2):269-285. doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00575-6. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
The Power of Personality: The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcomes.人格的力量:人格特质、社会经济地位和认知能力在预测重要人生结果方面的比较效度
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):313-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.
2
Personality and longevity: findings from the Georgia Centenarian Study.个性与长寿:佐治亚百岁老人研究的发现
Age (Dordr). 2006 Dec;28(4):343-52. doi: 10.1007/s11357-006-9022-8. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
3
Personality traits predict emergency department utilization over 3 years in older patients.人格特质可预测老年患者3年内的急诊科就诊情况。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;17(6):526-35. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181a2fbb1.
4
Five factor model personality factors moderated the effects of an intervention to enhance chronic disease management self-efficacy.五因素模型人格因素调节了一项旨在提高慢性病管理自我效能的干预措施的效果。
Br J Health Psychol. 2009 Sep;14(Pt 3):473-87. doi: 10.1348/135910708X360700. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
5
Age differences in the Big Five across the life span: evidence from two national samples.全生命周期中“大五”人格特质的年龄差异:来自两个全国性样本的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep;23(3):558-66. doi: 10.1037/a0012897.
6
The association of neighborhood poverty with personality change in childhood.邻里贫困与儿童期人格变化的关联。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jun;94(6):1048-61. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1048.
7
Commentary: Personality and health inequality: inconclusive evidence for an indirect hypothesis.评论:人格与健康不平等:间接假设的证据尚无定论。
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;37(3):602-3. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn062. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
8
Does personality explain social inequalities in mortality? The French GAZEL cohort study.人格特质能否解释死亡率方面的社会不平等现象?法国GAZEL队列研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;37(3):591-602. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn021. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
9
Neuroticism, extraversion, and mortality in the UK Health and Lifestyle Survey: a 21-year prospective cohort study.英国健康与生活方式调查中的神经质、外向性与死亡率:一项为期21年的前瞻性队列研究
Psychosom Med. 2007 Dec;69(9):923-31. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815abf83. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
10
Estimating interaction on an additive scale between continuous determinants in a logistic regression model.在逻辑回归模型中估计连续决定因素之间加法尺度上的交互作用。
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;36(5):1111-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym157. Epub 2007 Aug 27.