Suppr超能文献

低人生历程社会经济地位(SES)与消极的 NEO PI-R 人格模式有关。

Low life course socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with negative NEO PI-R personality patterns.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Int J Behav Med. 2011 Mar;18(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s12529-009-9069-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with poor health. One potential pathway accounting for this relationship may be an association between low SES and personality characteristics that affect health.

METHODS

Associations among parent's education, current SES (education and income), and personality were examined among 233 African Americans and Caucasian, male and female community volunteers.

RESULTS

Using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) to model neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness simultaneously, participant's education, household income, and father's and mother's education each had significant main effects on personality. When examining the life course--the combination of both current and childhood SES--distinctive patterns emerged for each domain, depending upon whether mother's or father's education was used to index childhood SES. When using mother's education as a childhood SES index, a high life course SES (high participant's SES/high mother's education) was associated with high extraversion and openness. Using father's education as a childhood SES index, a low life course SES (low participant's SES/low father's education) was associated with disproportionately high neuroticism and low conscientiousness. These effects did not differ by race or sex.

CONCLUSION

The implications of these findings for the role of personality in the SES-health relationship are discussed.

摘要

背景

低社会经济地位(SES)与健康状况不佳有关。造成这种关系的一个潜在途径可能是低 SES 与影响健康的人格特征之间存在关联。

方法

在 233 名非裔美国人和白种人、男性和女性社区志愿者中,研究了父母教育、当前 SES(教育和收入)和人格之间的关联。

结果

使用多元方差分析(MANOVA)同时对神经质、外向性、开放性、宜人性和尽责性进行建模,参与者的教育、家庭收入以及父亲和母亲的教育都对人格有显著的主要影响。在考察生活轨迹——当前和儿童时期 SES 的结合时,每个领域都出现了独特的模式,具体取决于使用母亲的教育还是父亲的教育来标记儿童时期的 SES。当使用母亲的教育作为儿童时期 SES 的指标时,高生活轨迹 SES(高参与者 SES/高母亲教育)与高外向性和开放性相关。当使用父亲的教育作为儿童时期 SES 的指标时,低生活轨迹 SES(低参与者 SES/低父亲教育)与不成比例的高神经质和低尽责性相关。这些影响不因种族或性别而异。

结论

讨论了这些发现对人格在 SES-健康关系中作用的影响。

相似文献

1
Low life course socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with negative NEO PI-R personality patterns.
Int J Behav Med. 2011 Mar;18(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s12529-009-9069-x.
3
Socioeconomic status moderates the association between John Henryism and NEO PI-R personality domains.
Psychosom Med. 2010 Feb;72(2):141-7. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181cdc00e. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
4
Father's Lifetime Socioeconomic Status, Small for Gestational Age Infants, and Infant Mortality: A Population-Based Study.
Ethn Dis. 2019 Jan 17;29(1):9-16. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.1.9. eCollection 2019 Winter.
5
Sex differences in the association of childhood socioeconomic status with adult blood pressure change: the CARDIA study.
Psychosom Med. 2012 Sep;74(7):728-35. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31825e32e8. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
7
Childhood socioeconomic status predicts physical functioning a half century later.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Jul;61(7):694-701. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.7.694.
8
Relationship between parents' mental disorders and socioeconomic status and offspring's psychopathology: A cross-sectional study.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 16;15(10):e0240681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240681. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Social origin and the intention to enrol in higher education: personality traits as a mechanism of reproduction or mobility?
Front Sociol. 2025 Aug 22;10:1652429. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1652429. eCollection 2025.
2
Distinct effects of early-stage and late-stage socioeconomic factors on brain and behavioral traits.
Nat Neurosci. 2025 Mar;28(3):676-687. doi: 10.1038/s41593-025-01882-w. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
5
Socioeconomic status, personality, and major mental disorders: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2024 Apr 27;10(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41537-024-00471-3.
6
Covariation of preadult environmental exposures, adult brain imaging phenotypes, and adult personality traits.
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Nov;28(11):4853-4866. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02261-2. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
7
Do applicants from Generation X, Y, Z differ in personality traits? data from selection procedures in aviation (1987-2019).
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 1;14:1173622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173622. eCollection 2023.
8
The effects of socioeconomic status on personality development in adulthood and aging.
J Pers. 2024 Feb;92(1):243-260. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12801. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
10
The relationships of family income and caste-status with religiousness: Mediation role of intolerance of uncertainty.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 26;17(8):e0273174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273174. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Being poor and coping with stress: health behaviors and the risk of death.
Am J Public Health. 2008 May;98(5):889-96. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114454. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
2
Coping and positive affect predict longitudinal change in glycosylated hemoglobin.
Health Psychol. 2008 Mar;27(2S):S163-71. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.2(Suppl.).S163.
3
Childhood socioeconomic status and serotonin transporter gene polymorphism enhance cardiovascular reactivity to mental stress.
Psychosom Med. 2008 Jan;70(1):32-9. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815f66c3. Epub 2007 Dec 24.
4
Neuroticism, extraversion, and mortality in the UK Health and Lifestyle Survey: a 21-year prospective cohort study.
Psychosom Med. 2007 Dec;69(9):923-31. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815abf83. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
5
Personality and risk of physical illness.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006;2:435-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095257.
6
Facets of openness predict mortality in patients with cardiac disease.
Psychosom Med. 2007 May;69(4):319-22. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318052e27d. Epub 2007 May 17.
7
Childhood socioeconomic circumstances predict specific causes of death in adulthood: the Glasgow student cohort study.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Jun;60(6):527-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.044727.
8
Who drinks and why? A review of socio-demographic, personality, and contextual issues behind the drinking motives in young people.
Addict Behav. 2006 Oct;31(10):1844-57. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.12.028. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
9
Domains and facets: hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory.
J Pers Assess. 1995 Feb;64(1):21-50. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2.
10
Systematic review of the influence of childhood socioeconomic circumstances on risk for cardiovascular disease in adulthood.
Ann Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;16(2):91-104. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.06.053. Epub 2005 Oct 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验