University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jan;38(1):102-15. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.102.
Four experiments were done to investigate the effects of repetition on judgment of recency (JOR). Experiment 1 showed that repetition can make an item seem either more recent or less recent than a nonrepeated item, depending on presentation spacing. Experiments 2-4 showed that subjects are able to judge the recency of a repeated item's first presentation or of its second presentation with a high degree of independence, especially if they report that the item occurred twice. The data are more consistent with an independent-trace explanation of JOR and repetition than with a cumulative-strength account, but neither hypothesis explains how repetition can make an item seem less recent. It is proposed that the findings as a whole can be better explained by a hypothesis based on recursive reminding.
进行了四项实验来研究重复对近因判断(JOR)的影响。实验 1 表明,重复会使一个项目看起来比非重复项目更近或更远,具体取决于呈现间隔。实验 2-4 表明,受试者能够高度独立地判断重复项目的第一次呈现或第二次呈现的近因,尤其是如果他们报告该项目出现了两次。数据更符合 JOR 和重复的独立轨迹解释,而不是累积强度解释,但这两种假设都无法解释为什么重复会使一个项目看起来更近。提出的基于递归提醒的假设可以更好地解释整体发现。