Suppr超能文献

证明海马体既支持再认也支持熟悉度判断。

A demonstration that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 5;107(1):344-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912543107. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

Abstract

Recognition memory is thought to depend on two distinct processes: recollection and familiarity. There is debate as to whether damage to the hippocampus selectively impairs recollection or whether it impairs both recollection and familiarity. If hippocampal damage selectively impairs recollection but leaves familiarity intact, then patients with circumscribed hippocampal lesions should exhibit the full normal range of low-confidence and high-confidence familiarity-based recognition. High-confidence, familiarity-based decisions are ordinarily accompanied by successful recollection (when memory is intact). However, patients with hippocampal lesions, if recollection is impaired, should frequently experience high-confidence, familiarity-based recognition in the absence of recollection, and this circumstance (termed the "butcher-on-the-bus" phenomenon) should occur more often in patients than in healthy controls. We tested five patients with circumscribed hippocampal damage, asking them to recognize recently studied words as well as to remember the context in which the items were studied. Relative to controls, the patients exhibited no increased tendency to experience the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon. The simplest explanation of the results is that hippocampal damage impairs familiarity as well as recollection. The same conclusion was suggested when two competing models of recognition memory were used to analyze the data.

摘要

再认记忆被认为依赖于两个不同的过程

再认和熟悉度。关于海马体损伤是否选择性地损害再认,或者是否同时损害再认和熟悉度,存在争议。如果海马体损伤选择性地损害再认但保留熟悉度,那么有局限性海马体损伤的患者应该表现出完整的低置信度和高置信度基于熟悉度的识别范围。高置信度、基于熟悉度的决策通常伴随着成功的再认(在记忆完好的情况下)。然而,如果再认受损,海马体损伤的患者应该经常在没有再认的情况下经历高置信度、基于熟悉度的识别,这种情况(称为“公交车上的屠夫”现象)在患者中比在健康对照组中更常见。我们测试了五名有局限性海马体损伤的患者,要求他们识别最近学习过的单词,并记住这些项目学习的背景。与对照组相比,患者没有表现出更倾向于经历“公交车上的屠夫”现象的趋势。最简单的解释是,海马体损伤既损害了熟悉度,也损害了再认。当使用两种竞争的识别记忆模型来分析数据时,也得出了同样的结论。

相似文献

1
A demonstration that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 5;107(1):344-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912543107. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
2
Impaired capacity for familiarity after hippocampal damage.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 7;108(23):9655-60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107247108. Epub 2011 May 23.
3
The hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 2;31(44):15693-702. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3438-11.2011.
4
The role of the human hippocampus in familiarity-based and recollection-based recognition memory.
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Dec 31;215(2):197-208. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.020. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
5
Recognition memory and the hippocampus: A test of the hippocampal contribution to recollection and familiarity.
Learn Mem. 2010 Jan 4;17(1):63-70. doi: 10.1101/lm.1546110. Print 2010 Jan.
6
Recollection and familiarity in hippocampal amnesia.
Hippocampus. 2008;18(5):469-80. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20412.
7
Neurophysiological evidence for a recollection impairment in amnesia patients that leaves familiarity intact.
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Nov;50(13):3004-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.038. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
8
A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107298. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107298. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
10
Semantic memory recognition is supported by intrinsic recollection-like processes: "The butcher on the bus" revisited.
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3573-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.040. Epub 2012 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
What does preferential viewing tell us about the neurobiology of recognition memory?
Trends Neurosci. 2024 May;47(5):326-337. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
3
When the brain, but not the person, remembers: Cortical reinstatement is modulated by retrieval goal in developmental amnesia.
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Apr 16;154:107788. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107788. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
4
Reduced Theta Power During Memory Retrieval in Depressed Adults.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Jul;4(7):636-643. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
5
Dynamics of brain activity reveal a unitary recognition signal.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Mar;45(3):440-451. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000593. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
6
The human hippocampus contributes to both the recollection and familiarity components of recognition memory.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 17;112(46):14378-83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1513145112. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
7
Memory Retrieval in Mice and Men.
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Oct 5;7(12):a021790. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a021790.
8
Remembering Preservation in Hippocampal Amnesia.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:51-82. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033739. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
9
A rapid, hippocampus-dependent, item-memory signal that initiates context memory in humans.
Curr Biol. 2012 Dec 18;22(24):2369-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.055. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
10
A role for perirhinal cortex in memory for novel object-context associations.
J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 28;32(13):4473-81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5751-11.2012.

本文引用的文献

2
Testing signal-detection models of yes/no and two-alternative forced-choice recognition memory.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 May;138(2):291-306. doi: 10.1037/a0015525.
3
Constructing receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) with experimental animals: cautionary notes.
Learn Mem. 2008 Aug 26;15(9):687-90. doi: 10.1101/lm.1077708. Print 2008 Sep.
4
The dimensionality of the remember-know task: a state-trace analysis.
Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):426-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.426.
5
Not all repetition is alike: different benefits of repetition in amnesia and normal memory.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008 May;14(3):365-72. doi: 10.1017/S1355617708080612.
6
I'd know that face anywhere!
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Dec;14(6):1085-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193095.
7
Recognition memory: opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity.
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan;11(1):16-8. doi: 10.1038/nn2016. Epub 2007 Nov 25.
8
Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Nov;8(11):872-83. doi: 10.1038/nrn2154.
10
The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:123-52. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094328.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验