McHale Jean V
School of Law, Univeristy of Leicester, UK.
Br J Nurs. 2009;18(18):1130-1. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.18.44556.
Organ transplantation has been one of the great medical miracles: from the first kidney transplant, through to Christian Barnard's first heart transplant in the 1960s, to face transplants. However, the need for organs for transplant has never been matched by a ready supply. It has been argued by some commentators that the shortage could be radically reduced or even eradicated by legal reform, such as the introduction of 'opt-out' legislation or a market in organs. This article explores the current law regulating organ transplantation and the case for reform. It suggests that to focus upon legal reform as a means of addressing the transplant 'crisis' may be an unduly simplistic response. The shortage of organs for transplantation cannot be easily resolved by a single piece of legislative reform.
从首例肾脏移植,到20世纪60年代克里斯蒂安·巴纳德的首例心脏移植,再到面部移植。然而,移植器官的需求从未得到充足供应的匹配。一些评论家认为,通过法律改革,如引入“选择退出”立法或器官市场,短缺情况可以大幅减少甚至消除。本文探讨了当前规范器官移植的法律以及改革的理由。文章认为,将法律改革作为解决移植“危机”的手段可能是一种过于简单化的回应。移植器官的短缺无法通过单一的立法改革轻易解决。