Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kosygin Str. 19, 119 991 Moscow, Russia.
Electrophoresis. 2010 Jan;31(1):192-204. doi: 10.1002/elps.200900397.
This review article represents the sixth in a series of reviews on CE applied to inorganic analysis, appearing in this journal, and focuses on material published in 2007-2008. As a fundamental review, it examines primarily those documents in which the emphasis is on advances in general CE methodology which are traditionally set on the attainment of higher detection sensitivity and greater preconcentration factors both in capillary and microchip separation formats. Following a major research trend of the previous review period (see A.R. Timerbaev, Electrophoresis 2007, 28, 3420-3425), publications focusing on the quantification of different element species continue to rapidly outpace other applications. A range of practicable separation and detection designs tailor-made to species-selective analysis are critically discussed in order to assess their impact on the rate of development and wide acceptance of CE in the field.
这篇综述文章是第六篇关于应用于无机分析的 CE 系列综述之一，发表在本期刊上，重点介绍 2007 年至 2008 年期间发表的文献。作为一篇基础综述，本文主要关注那些强调传统上以提高检测灵敏度和在毛细管和微芯片分离模式下更大的预浓缩因子为目标的通用 CE 方法进展的文献。延续上一个综述期的主要研究趋势（参见 A.R. Timerbaev，Electrophoresis 2007，28，3420-3425），专注于不同元素形态定量的出版物继续迅速超过其他应用。本文批判性地讨论了一系列针对选择性分析的实用分离和检测设计，以评估它们对 CE 在该领域的发展速度和广泛接受度的影响。
