• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双眼固视视差在单个单词呈现中。

Binocular fixation disparity in single word displays.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE19HN, UK.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1961-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016889.

DOI:10.1037/a0016889
PMID:19968446
Abstract

It has been claimed that the recognition of words displayed in isolation is affected by the precise location at which they are fixated. However, this putative role for fixation location has yet to be reconciled with the finding from reading research that binocular fixations are often misaligned and, therefore, more than 1 location in a word is often fixated simultaneously. The accuracy and alignment of binocular fixations during single word processing have not been assessed previously. To investigate this issue, words were presented for lexical decision at locations around a central fixation point. Eye-tracking data revealed that participants often fixated inaccurately and that fixations were frequently misaligned, but that this did not affect word recognition. The findings show that binocular fixation disparity is pervasive even in single word displays and a potential source of confound for research into effects of fixation location on word recognition.

摘要

有人声称,孤立显示的单词的识别受到注视点精确位置的影响。然而,这种注视点位置的假定作用尚未与阅读研究的发现相协调,即双眼注视通常是不对准的,因此,一个单词通常同时注视多个位置。在单个单词处理过程中,双眼注视的准确性和对准性以前没有得到评估。为了研究这个问题,单词在中央注视点周围的位置呈现进行词汇判断。眼动追踪数据显示,参与者经常不准确地注视,并且注视经常不对准,但这并不影响单词识别。研究结果表明,即使在单个单词显示中,双眼注视视差也很普遍,并且是注视位置对单词识别影响的潜在混淆源。

相似文献

1
Binocular fixation disparity in single word displays.双眼固视视差在单个单词呈现中。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1961-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016889.
2
Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.重新评估单眼阅读过程中字词识别的裂脑加工:字词长度的影响。
Cortex. 2010 Jan;46(1):100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.10.008. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
3
Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.重新评估字词识别中的裂脑处理:注视点在字词内位置的影响。
Cortex. 2010 Mar;46(3):298-309. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
4
Evaluating hemispheric divisions in processing fixated words: the evidence from Arabic.评估处理注视单词时的半球分工:来自阿拉伯语的证据。
Cortex. 2011 Sep;47(8):992-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
5
Do fixation cues ensure fixation accuracy in split-fovea studies of word recognition?在单词识别的裂中央凹研究中,注视线索能确保注视准确性吗?
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jul;47(8-9):2004-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.014. Epub 2008 Dec 14.
6
Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.重新评估单词识别中的中央凹分裂加工:单词长度的影响。
Cortex. 2009 Apr;45(4):495-505. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.07.007. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
7
Dichotomy between luminance and disparity features at binocular fixations.双眼注视时亮度与视差特征之间的二分法。
J Vis. 2010 Oct 22;10(12):23. doi: 10.1167/10.12.23.
8
Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.重新评估单词识别中的中央凹分裂加工:视网膜离心率对半球优势的影响。
Neuropsychology. 2008 Nov;22(6):738-45. doi: 10.1037/a0013140.
9
Linking physiology with behaviour: Functional specialisation of the visual field is reflected in gaze patterns during visual search.将生理学与行为联系起来:视野的功能特化在视觉搜索过程中的注视模式中得以体现。
Vision Res. 2009 Jan;49(2):237-48. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.021. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
10
Binocular coordination of saccades in 7 years old children in single word reading and target fixation.7岁儿童单字阅读和目标注视时扫视的双眼协调
Vision Res. 2006 Feb;46(4):457-66. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.05.004. Epub 2005 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A gaze-contingent saccadic re-referencing training with simulated central vision loss.注视相关扫视重定参考训练与模拟中心视力丧失。
J Vis. 2023 Jan 3;23(1):13. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.1.13.
2
Cyclopean, Dominant, and Non-dominant Gaze Tracking for Smooth Pursuit Gaze Interaction.用于平滑追踪注视交互的双眼、优势眼和非优势眼注视跟踪
J Eye Mov Res. 2017 Jan 25;10(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.10.1.2.
3
Binocular misalignments elicited by altered gravity provide evidence for nonlinear central compensation.重力改变引发的双眼视轴不正为非线性中枢补偿提供了证据。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Jun 2;9:81. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00081. eCollection 2015.
4
An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition.一项关于注视点和非注视点单词识别中半球投射的 ERP 评估。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023957. Epub 2011 Sep 15.