Terrace Herbert
Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.
Behav Processes. 2010 Feb;83(2):139-53. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.12.003. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
The eminent psychophysicist, S.S. Stevens, once remarked that, "the basic problem of psychology was the definition of the stimulus" (Stevens, 1951, p. 46). By expanding the traditional definition of the stimulus, the study of animal learning has metamorphosed into animal cognition. The main impetus for that change was the recognition that it is often necessary to postulate a representation between the traditional S and R of learning theory. Representations allow a subject to represent a stimulus it learned previously that is currently absent. Thus, in delayed matching-to-sample, one has to assume that a subject responds to a representation of the sample during test if it responds correctly. Other examples, to name but a few, include concept formation, spatial memory, serial memory, learning a numerical rule, imitation and metacognition. Whereas a representation used to be regarded as a mentalistic phenomenon that was unworthy of scientific inquiry, it can now be operationally defined. To accommodate representations, the traditional discriminative stimulus has to be expanded to allow for the role of representations. The resulting composite can account for a significantly larger portion of the variance of performance measures than the exteroceptive stimulus could by itself.
杰出的心理物理学家S.S.史蒂文斯曾说过:“心理学的基本问题是刺激的定义”(史蒂文斯,1951年,第46页)。通过扩展刺激的传统定义,动物学习的研究已转变为动物认知研究。这一变化的主要推动力是人们认识到,在学习理论的传统刺激(S)和反应(R)之间,常常需要假定存在一种表征。表征使主体能够表征其先前学习过但当前不存在的刺激。因此,在延迟匹配样本任务中,如果主体做出正确反应,就必须假定它在测试期间是对样本的表征做出反应。仅举几例,其他例子还包括概念形成、空间记忆、序列记忆、学习数字规则、模仿和元认知。表征曾经被视为一种不值得科学探究的心理现象,而现在可以进行操作性定义。为了适应表征,传统的辨别性刺激必须加以扩展,以考虑表征的作用。由此产生的综合因素能够解释的绩效指标方差比例,比外部感受性刺激本身所能解释的要大得多。