• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓损伤患者的计划、闲暇时间体力活动和应对自我效能:一项随机对照试验。

Planning, leisure-time physical activity, and coping self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec;90(12):2003-11. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.019.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.019
PMID:19969161
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Martin Ginis KA, Latimer AE. Planning, leisure-time physical activity, and coping self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of action and coping planning (ACP) on leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and coping self-efficacy in exercise initiates living with spinal cord injury (SCI).

DESIGN

Ten-week, single-blind randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

General community.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (N=44) with SCI (mean age +/- SD, 49.70+/-12.71y) were randomly assigned to either an action planning only (APO; n=22) or an ACP (n=22) condition.

INTERVENTION

Participants in the APO condition formed action plans for LTPA at weeks 1 and 5, and self-monitored their LTPA behavior. Those in the ACP condition formed coping plans for managing self-identified activity barriers, in addition to forming action plans and self-monitoring.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Measures of intentions, coping self-efficacy, and behavior were assessed at weeks 1, 5, and 10.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analyses indicated that persons in the ACP condition reported significantly greater LTPA, scheduling, and general barriers self-efficacy at weeks 5 and 10, in comparison with those in the APO condition. Scheduling self-efficacy mediated the effects of the intervention on LTPA, accounting for 38% of the total effect of the intervention on week 5 LTPA.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings illustrate the effectiveness of supplementing action plans with coping plans for enhancing LTPA and coping self-efficacy beliefs among exercise initiates living with SCI.

摘要

未加标签

Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP、Martin Ginis KA、Latimer AE。脊髓损伤患者的计划、休闲时间体力活动和应对自我效能:一项随机对照试验。

目的

研究行动和应对规划(ACP)对开始锻炼的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者休闲时间体力活动(LTPA)和应对自我效能的影响。

设计

十周、单盲随机对照试验。

地点

一般社区。

参与者

患有 SCI 的成年人(N=44,平均年龄 +/- SD,49.70+/-12.71y)被随机分配到仅行动规划(APO;n=22)或 ACP(n=22)条件。

干预

APO 条件下的参与者在第 1 周和第 5 周制定 LTPA 的行动计划,并自我监测他们的 LTPA 行为。ACP 条件下的参与者制定应对计划来管理自我确定的活动障碍,除了制定行动计划和自我监测。

主要结果测量

在第 1、5 和 10 周评估意图、应对自我效能和行为。

结果

意向治疗分析表明,与 APO 条件相比,ACP 条件下的人在第 5 周和第 10 周报告了更多的 LTPA、计划和一般障碍自我效能。计划自我效能在干预对 LTPA 的影响中起中介作用,占干预对第 5 周 LTPA 的总效应的 38%。

结论

这些发现表明,在行动计划中补充应对计划可以有效地提高开始锻炼的 SCI 患者的 LTPA 和应对自我效能信念。

相似文献

1
Planning, leisure-time physical activity, and coping self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial.脊髓损伤患者的计划、闲暇时间体力活动和应对自我效能:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec;90(12):2003-11. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.019.
2
Leisure time physical activity in a population-based sample of people with spinal cord injury part I: demographic and injury-related correlates.基于人群的脊髓损伤患者样本中的闲暇时间体力活动 第一部分:人口统计学和损伤相关的相关性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 May;91(5):722-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.12.027.
3
Leisure time physical activity in a population-based sample of people with spinal cord injury part II: activity types, intensities, and durations.基于人群的脊髓损伤患者样本中的休闲时间体力活动 Ⅱ:活动类型、强度和持续时间。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 May;91(5):729-33. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.12.028.
4
The role of self-efficacy in the wheelchair skills-physical activity relationship among manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.自我效能感在脊髓损伤手动轮椅使用者轮椅技能与身体活动关系中的作用。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(8):625-32. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.613516. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
5
Sex differences in theory-based predictors of leisure time physical activity in a population-based sample of adults with spinal cord injury.基于理论的预测因素在基于人群的脊髓损伤成年人休闲时间体力活动中的性别差异。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Sep;95(9):1787-90. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.021. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
6
Developing physical activity interventions for adults with spinal cord injury. Part 3: a pilot feasibility study of an intervention to increase self-managed physical activity.为脊髓损伤成年人制定身体活动干预措施。第 3 部分:一项增加自我管理身体活动干预措施的试点可行性研究。
Rehabil Psychol. 2013 Aug;58(3):316-21. doi: 10.1037/a0032814.
7
Developing physical activity interventions for adults with spinal cord injury. Part 1: a comparison of social cognitions across actors, intenders, and nonintenders.为脊髓损伤成年人制定身体活动干预措施。第 1 部分:对行动者、意向者和非意向者的社会认知进行比较。
Rehabil Psychol. 2013 Aug;58(3):299-306. doi: 10.1037/a0032815.
8
Get in motion: an evaluation of the reach and effectiveness of a physical activity telephone counseling service for Canadians living with spinal cord injury.动起来:对一项面向脊髓损伤加拿大患者的体育活动电话咨询服务的覆盖范围和效果评估。
PM R. 2014 Dec;6(12):1088-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
9
Reliability and validity tests of the leisure time physical activity questionnaire for people with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤患者休闲时间体力活动问卷的信度和效度测试。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Apr;93(4):677-82. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.005. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
10
Developing physical activity interventions for adults with spinal cord injury. Part 2: motivational counseling and peer-mediated interventions for people intending to be active.为脊髓损伤成年人制定身体活动干预措施。第 2 部分:打算积极活动的人群的动机咨询和同伴介导干预。
Rehabil Psychol. 2013 Aug;58(3):307-315. doi: 10.1037/a0032816.

引用本文的文献

1
Collaborative Care Versus Usual Care to Improve Quality of Life, Pain, Depression, and Physical Activity in Outpatients With Spinal Cord Injury: The SCI-CARE Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.协作式护理与常规护理对改善脊髓损伤门诊患者生活质量、疼痛、抑郁和身体活动的效果比较:一项脊髓损伤协作式护理随机对照临床试验。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Dec;40(23-24):2667-2679. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0200. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
2
Theory- and evidence-based best practices for physical activity counseling for adults with spinal cord injury.理论和循证最佳实践为成人脊髓损伤的身体活动咨询。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2024 Jul;47(4):584-596. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2169062. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
3
An Online Physical Activity Intervention for Youth With Physical Disabilities: A Pilot Study.
一项针对残疾青少年的在线体育活动干预:一项试点研究。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Apr 30;2:651688. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.651688. eCollection 2021.
4
A dynamic analysis of physical activity barriers experienced by adults with spinal cord injury.成年人脊髓损伤后经历的身体活动障碍的动态分析。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2022 Mar 29;8(1):37. doi: 10.1038/s41394-022-00504-y.
5
A tele-health intervention to increase physical fitness in people with spinal cord injury and cardiometabolic disease or risk factors: a pilot randomized controlled trial.一种远程医疗干预措施,以提高患有脊髓损伤和心血管代谢疾病或风险因素的人群的身体健康水平:一项试点随机对照试验。
Spinal Cord. 2021 Jan;59(1):63-73. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0523-6. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
6
A Scoping Review of Self-Management Interventions Following Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤后自我管理干预措施的范围综述
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2020 Winter;26(1):36-63. doi: 10.1310/sci2601-36.
7
Self-Control and Exercise: A Review of the Bi-Directional Relationship.自我控制与运动:双向关系综述
Brain Plast. 2019 Dec 26;5(1):97-104. doi: 10.3233/BPL-190082.
8
Associations between health behaviour, secondary health conditions and quality of life in people with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤患者的健康行为、继发健康状况与生活质量之间的关联。
Afr J Disabil. 2019 Jun 11;8:463. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v8i0.463. eCollection 2019.
9
The Effects of a Patient and Provider Co-Developed, Behavioral Physical Activity Intervention on Physical Activity, Psychosocial Predictors, and Fitness in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.患者和医护人员共同制定的行为体力活动干预对脊髓损伤患者体力活动、心理社会预测因素和健康相关体能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Sports Med. 2019 Jul;49(7):1117-1131. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01118-5.
10
Gain-Framed Messaging for Promoting Adult Sport: Examining the Effects of Efficacy-Enhancing Information.用于促进成人运动的获益框架信息传递:检验效能增强信息的效果。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 8;10:431. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00431. eCollection 2019.