Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Apr;93(4):677-82. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.005. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
To examine the criterion validity and test-retest reliability of the Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Spinal Cord Injury (LTPAQ-SCI), a brief measure of leisure time physical activity (LTPA) for people with spinal cord injury (SCI).
Survey with a 1-week follow-up.
General community.
Men and women with SCI (N=103; mean age ± SD, 48.1±12.7 y; mean years postinjury ± SD, 17.9±11.9) who used a wheelchair as the primary mode of mobility.
Not applicable.
Participants completed the Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with SCI (PARA-SCI) and the LTPAQ-SCI. A subset of the participants (n=35) completed the LTPAQ-SCI a second time, 7 days later.
Statistically significant, positive correlations emerged between the LTPAQ-SCI and PARA-SCI measures of mild, moderate, and heavy intensity LTPA as well as total LTPA. All 4 intraclass correlation coefficients were significant across the test-retest period.
This study provides preliminary evidence of the criterion validity and reliability of the LTPAQ-SCI as a brief measure of LTPA performed by people with SCI.
检验脊髓损伤人群休闲时间体力活动问卷(LTPAQ-SCI)的效标效度和重测信度,该问卷是一种用于评估脊髓损伤人群休闲时间体力活动(LTPA)的简短工具。
具有 1 周随访的调查。
普通社区。
使用轮椅作为主要移动方式的脊髓损伤患者(n=103;平均年龄±标准差,48.1±12.7 岁;平均损伤后年限±标准差,17.9±11.9 年)的男性和女性。
不适用。
参与者完成了脊髓损伤人群体力活动回忆评估(PARA-SCI)和 LTPAQ-SCI。部分参与者(n=35)在 7 天后再次完成了 LTPAQ-SCI 测试。
LTPAQ-SCI 与 PARA-SCI 对轻、中、高强度 LTPA 以及总 LTPA 的测量之间存在显著的正相关关系。在整个重测期间,所有 4 个组内相关系数均具有统计学意义。
本研究初步证明了 LTPAQ-SCI 作为一种用于评估脊髓损伤人群 LTPA 的简短工具的效标效度和可靠性。