• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

裂隙扫描式角膜测厚仪和非接触式共焦显微镜测量的中央角膜和周边角膜厚度之间的差异。

Discrepancy between central and midperipheral corneal thickness measurements obtained with slit-scanning pachymetry and noncontact specular microscopy.

机构信息

Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Dec;35(12):2127-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.07.012.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.07.012
PMID:19969219
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare corneal thickness measurements obtained by a slit-scanning method with those obtained by noncontact specular microscopy, with a focus on the midperipheral (3.0 mm) region of the cornea.

SETTING

Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

METHODS

In adults with up to 8.50 diopters of myopia, single measurements of corneal thickness were performed with specular microscopy (Topcon SP-2000P) at central, 3.0 mm nasal, and temporal midperiphery locations. Slit-scanning pachymetry (Orbscan II) measurements were then taken and data extracted for 2.0 mm diameter sample zones at the central, 3.0 mm nasal, and temporal locations.

RESULTS

The mean corneal thickness by specular microscopy was 0.524 mm in the central zone, 0.586 mm in the temporal location, and 0.547 mm in the temporal location. The mean uncorrected slit-scanning pachymetry readings were 0.584 mm, 0.668 mm, and 0.658 mm, respectively, and the mean 0.92 acoustic factor-corrected readings, 0.538 mm, 0.614 mm, and 0.603 mm, respectively. At central locations, the corrected slit-scanning measurements agreed with specular microscopy measurements to within +/-0.014 mm (95% confidence interval, -0.019 to +0.045 mm). However, even with correction, discrepancies at the midperipheral locations were as high as 4 times greater (temporal).

CONCLUSION

Results show that the slit-scanning pachymeter can substantially overestimate more peripheral thickness measurements of the cornea than specular microscopy or ultrasound pachymetry and that the differences cannot be corrected using the same acoustic factor (0.92). Off-center slit-scanning thickness measurements, therefore, cannot be used interchangeably with those obtained with other pachymetry methods, especially before refractive surgery.

摘要

目的

比较角膜厚度测量的裂隙扫描法与非接触镜面反射显微镜,重点是角膜的中周边(3.0 毫米)区域。

地点

格拉斯哥喀里多尼亚大学视觉科学系,英国格拉斯哥。

方法

在近视不超过 8.50 屈光度的成年人中,使用镜面反射显微镜(Topcon SP-2000P)在中央、3.0 毫米鼻侧和颞侧中周边位置进行单次角膜厚度测量。然后进行裂隙扫描眼压计(Orbscan II)测量,并从中提取中央、3.0 毫米鼻侧和颞侧位置 2.0 毫米直径样本区的数据。

结果

镜面反射显微镜测量的角膜平均厚度为中央区 0.524 毫米,颞侧 0.586 毫米,颞侧 0.547 毫米。未经校正的裂隙扫描眼压计读数分别为 0.584 毫米、0.668 毫米和 0.658 毫米,分别为平均 0.92 声速校正读数 0.538 毫米、0.614 毫米和 0.603 毫米。在中央位置,校正后的裂隙扫描测量值与镜面反射显微镜测量值的差异在 0.014 毫米以内(95%置信区间,-0.019 至+0.045 毫米)。然而,即使经过校正,中周边位置的差异高达 4 倍(颞侧)。

结论

结果表明,裂隙扫描眼压计可大大高估角膜更周边的厚度测量值,超过镜面反射显微镜或超声眼压计,并且无法使用相同的声速(0.92)进行校正。因此,偏心裂隙扫描厚度测量值不能与其他眼压计方法获得的值互换使用,尤其是在屈光手术之前。

相似文献

1
Discrepancy between central and midperipheral corneal thickness measurements obtained with slit-scanning pachymetry and noncontact specular microscopy.裂隙扫描式角膜测厚仪和非接触式共焦显微镜测量的中央角膜和周边角膜厚度之间的差异。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Dec;35(12):2127-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.07.012.
2
An assessment of regional differences in corneal thickness in normal human eyes, using the Orbscan II or ultrasound pachymetry.使用Orbscan II或超声测厚法对正常人类眼睛角膜厚度的区域差异进行评估。
Optometry. 2007 Apr;78(4):181-90. doi: 10.1016/j.optm.2006.08.018.
3
Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II scanning slit topography, noncontact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes with keratoconus.使用Orbscan II扫描裂隙地形图、非接触式角膜内皮显微镜和超声角膜测厚法测量圆锥角膜患者的中央角膜厚度。
Cornea. 2005 Nov;24(8):967-71. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000159733.37554.ba.
4
Corneal thickness measurements: scanning-slit corneal topography and noncontact specular microscopy versus ultrasonic pachymetry.角膜厚度测量:扫描裂隙角膜地形图及非接触式角膜内皮显微镜检查与超声角膜测厚法的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Jul;29(7):1313-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00123-8.
5
Scanning-slit and specular microscopic pachymetry in comparison with ultrasonic determination of corneal thickness.扫描裂隙显微镜和镜面显微镜测厚与超声角膜测厚的比较
Cornea. 2001 Oct;20(7):711-4. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200110000-00008.
6
Central corneal thickness measurements after myopic photorefractive keratectomy using Scheimpflug imaging, scanning-slit topography, and ultrasonic pachymetry.使用 Scheimpflug 成像、扫描-slit topography 和超声角膜测厚仪测量近视性光折射性角膜切削术后的中央角膜厚度。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Sep;36(9):1543-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.03.042.
7
Regional repeatability measures of corneal thickness: Orbscan II and ultrasound.
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Jan;84(1):52-8. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000254045.62252.b4.
8
Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, non-contact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis.准分子原位角膜磨镶术后使用Orbscan II、非接触式角膜内皮显微镜和超声角膜测厚仪测量角膜厚度的比较。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;88(4):466-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.030361.
9
Effect of a proparacaine 0.50%-sodium fluorescein 0.25% mix and contact ultrasound pachymetry on central and midperipheral corneal thickness measured by noncontact optical pachymetry.复方丙美卡因 0.50%联合荧光素 0.25%混合制剂与接触式超声角膜测厚仪对非接触式光学角膜测厚仪测量的中央及周边角膜中央和周边厚度的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 May;37(5):907-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.11.033. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
10
Quantitative anatomical differences in central corneal thickness values determined with scanning-slit corneal topography and noncontact specular microscopy.通过扫描裂隙角膜地形图和非接触式角膜内皮显微镜测定的中央角膜厚度值的定量解剖学差异。
Cornea. 2006 Feb;25(2):203-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000176605.72129.2c.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and agreement of the central and mid-peripheral corneal thickness measured by a new Scheimpflug based imaging.基于新型Scheimpflug成像技术测量的中央及中周边角膜厚度的可靠性与一致性
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1136. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7895.
2
Cornea and anterior eye assessment with placido-disc keratoscopy, slit scanning evaluation topography and scheimpflug imaging tomography.角膜和眼前节评估的角膜地形图、扫描检眼镜评估地形和共焦激光角膜显微镜成像断层扫描。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;66(3):360-366. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_850_17.
3
Comparison of central corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry versus slit-lamp optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, and Orbscan.
中央角膜厚度的比较:超声角膜测厚术与裂隙灯光学相干断层扫描、镜面显微镜检查及Orbscan的比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun 12;9:1065-70. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S81376. eCollection 2015.
4
Central and midperipheral corneal thickness measured with Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography.使用眼前节分析系统和光学相干断层扫描测量中央和周边角膜厚度。
PLoS One. 2014 May 22;9(5):e98316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098316. eCollection 2014.
5
An explanation for the central to peripheral thickness variation in the mouse cornea.解释小鼠角膜中央到周边厚度变化的原因。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;40(2):174-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02652.x. Epub 2011 Sep 19.