Vrije Universiteit of Amsterdam, Department of Theoretical Biology, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sci Total Environ. 2010 Aug 15;408(18):3735-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.066. Epub 2009 Dec 6.
Studies in ecotoxicology usually focus on a single end point (typically mortality, growth, or reproduction) at a standardized exposure time. The exposure time is chosen irrespective of the properties of the chemical under scrutiny, but should depend on the organism of choice in combination with the compound(s) of interest. This paper discusses the typical patterns for toxic effects in time that can be observed for the most encountered endpoints growth reproduction and survival. Ignoring the fact that toxicity is a process in time can lead to severe bias in environmental risk assessment. We show that especially EC(x) values for sublethal endpoints can show very distinct patterns in time. We recommend that the test duration for survival as an endpoint should be extended till the incipient LC(50) is observed. Given the fact that toxicity data for single compounds show clear patterns in time, it is to be expected that effects of mixtures will also be strongly dependent on time. The few examples that have been published support this statement.
生态毒理学研究通常集中在单一终点(通常是死亡率、生长或繁殖)的标准化暴露时间上。暴露时间的选择与被审查的化学物质的特性无关,但应根据所选生物与相关化合物相结合来确定。本文讨论了最常见的终点(生长、繁殖和存活)在时间上观察到的毒性效应的典型模式。忽略毒性是一个随时间发生的过程这一事实,可能会导致环境风险评估中出现严重的偏差。我们表明,特别是亚致死终点的 EC(x) 值在时间上可能表现出非常明显的模式。我们建议,将生存作为终点的测试持续时间应延长至观察到初始 LC(50)。鉴于单一化合物的毒性数据在时间上显示出明显的模式,预计混合物的效应也将强烈依赖于时间。已经发表的少数几个例子支持了这一说法。