• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规腹腔镜胃带与经腹腔镜单部位胃带比较研究。

Comparison study of conventional laparoscopic gastric banding versus laparoendoscopic single site gastric banding.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, California 92868, USA.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Sep-Oct;6(5):503-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2009.10.001
PMID:19969508
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic gastric banding is commonly performed using 5-6 abdominal trocars with enlargement of the largest trocar for implantation of the subcutaneous port. The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of conventional laparoscopic gastric banding with those of gastric banding performed through a single or duel incision.

METHODS

From April 2008 to May 2009, 23 patients underwent laparoscopic gastric banding through a single, 3.5-4.5-cm incision with implantation of the port through the same incision. The 2 study cohorts were matched for age, gender, and body mass index. The outcome measures included the operative time, blood loss, need for conversion to 5-trocar laparoscopy, and perioperative morbidity.

RESULTS

Each group included 6 men and 17 women. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups with regard to preoperative body mass index (40 versus 39 kg/m(2)), operative time, blood loss, or length of hospital stay. Of the 23 patients in the single incision group, 3 (13%) required conversion to conventional 5-trocar laparoscopy. No intraoperative or postoperative complications developed in either group.

CONCLUSION

The present results have shown that in a subset of patients with a lower body mass index, adjustable gastric banding performed through a single laparoscopic incision is technically feasible and safe and does not prolong the operative time. The procedure can be performed with mostly existing ports, laparoscopic instrumentation, and visualization platforms. A prospective randomized trial is necessary to determine the clinical advantages of this less-invasive technique.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜胃束带术通常使用 5-6 个腹部 trocar,并通过扩大最大 trocar 来植入皮下端口。本研究旨在比较传统腹腔镜胃束带术与单切口或双切口胃束带术的结果。

方法

从 2008 年 4 月至 2009 年 5 月,23 例患者通过一个 3.5-4.5cm 的单一切口进行腹腔镜胃束带术,并通过同一切口植入端口。这两个研究组在年龄、性别和体重指数方面相匹配。主要观察指标包括手术时间、出血量、需要转换为 5 孔腹腔镜以及围手术期并发症。

结果

每组各有 6 名男性和 17 名女性。两组患者术前体重指数(40 千克/平方米与 39 千克/平方米)、手术时间、出血量或住院时间无显著差异。在单切口组的 23 例患者中,有 3 例(13%)需要转换为传统的 5 孔腹腔镜。两组均无术中或术后并发症发生。

结论

目前的结果表明,在一部分体重指数较低的患者中,通过单一切口腹腔镜进行可调节胃束带术在技术上是可行和安全的,并且不会延长手术时间。该手术可以使用现有的大部分端口、腹腔镜器械和可视化平台进行。需要前瞻性随机试验来确定这种微创技术的临床优势。

相似文献

1
Comparison study of conventional laparoscopic gastric banding versus laparoendoscopic single site gastric banding.常规腹腔镜胃带与经腹腔镜单部位胃带比较研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Sep-Oct;6(5):503-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
2
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: five years of follow-up.腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与腹腔镜可调胃束带术:5 年随访。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Sep-Oct;6(5):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.02.045. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
3
Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding versus vertical banded gastroplasty in morbidly obese patients.腹腔镜可调节硅胶胃束带术与垂直束带胃成形术治疗病态肥胖患者的比较
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):392-3; author reply 393.
4
Early experience with single incision transumbilical laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding using the SILS Port.经脐单切口腹腔镜可调胃绑带术(SILS Port)的早期经验。
Int J Surg. 2009 Oct;7(5):456-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
5
Two-year follow-up of wound complications associated with laparoendoscopic single-site adjustable gastric banding.腹腔镜单部位可调胃束带术相关伤口并发症的两年随访。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):696-700. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.07.005. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
6
Laparoendoscopic single-site adjustable gastric banding: technical considerations.腹腔镜单孔可调式胃束带术:技术要点
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Dec;21(6):e295-300. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31823acd93.
7
Laparoscopic Swedish adjustable gastric banding: 6-year follow-up and comparison to other laparoscopic bariatric procedures.腹腔镜瑞典可调节胃束带术:6年随访及与其他腹腔镜减肥手术的比较。
Obes Surg. 2003 Jun;13(3):412-7. doi: 10.1381/096089203765887750.
8
[Surgery for morbid obesity: 2. Complications. Results of a Technologic Evaluation by the ANAES].[病态肥胖症手术:2. 并发症。ANAES 技术评估结果]
J Chir (Paris). 2003 Feb;140(1):4-21.
9
Adjustable gastric banding outcomes with and without gastrogastric imbrication sutures: a randomized controlled trial.带和不带胃胃吻合缝线的可调胃束带术结果:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011 Jan-Feb;7(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.09.018. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
10
[Surgical treatment of severe obesity. The effect of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding].[重度肥胖的外科治疗。腹腔镜可调节胃束带术的效果]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 May 2;167(18):1942-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery vs conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of gastric diseases: A meta-analysis.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术与传统多孔腹腔镜手术治疗胃部疾病的有效性和安全性的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 22;100(3):e23941. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023941.
2
Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Bariatric Surgery: A Review of Single-Port Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Bariatric Treatments.腹腔镜单孔减重手术:单孔腹腔镜及内镜减重治疗综述
J Obes Metab Syndr. 2018 Mar 30;27(1):25-34. doi: 10.7570/jomes.2018.27.1.25.
3
Two hundred seventy-five single-incision laparoscopic gastric band insertions: what have we learnt?
275例单切口腹腔镜胃束带置入术:我们学到了什么?
Obes Surg. 2014 Jul;24(7):1073-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1208-z.
4
Single-access laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal: technique and initial experience.单孔腹腔镜可调胃束带取出术:技术与初步经验。
Obes Surg. 2013 Feb;23(2):272-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0814-x.
5
Single and multiple incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a matched comparison.单切口与多切口腹腔镜可调胃束带术:一项匹配对照研究。
Obes Surg. 2012 Nov;22(11):1695-700. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0704-2.
6
A case-controlled matched-pair cohort study of single-incision and conventional laparoscopic gastric band patients in a single US center with 1-year follow-up.单中心、1 年随访的单切口与传统腹腔镜胃带患者病例对照匹配队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec;26(12):3467-75. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2363-8. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
7
Single-port laparascopic cholecystectomy: scarless cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:无痕胆囊切除术。
Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:204380. doi: 10.1155/2012/204380. Epub 2012 May 7.
8
Initial learning experience of laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) gastric banding: finding predictors of success.腹腔镜单部位(LESS)胃带术的初步学习经验:寻找成功的预测因素。
Obes Surg. 2012 Mar;22(3):433-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0552-5.
9
Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between single-site access (SSA) devices and an independent-port SSA approach.单部位入路(SSA)器械与独立端口 SSA 方法在腹腔镜技能表现方面的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):714-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1941-5. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
10
Early surgeon impressions and technical difficulty associated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Learning Center study.腹腔镜单部位手术相关的早期外科医生印象和技术难度:美国胃肠内镜外科医生学会学习中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2597-603. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1594-4. Epub 2011 Feb 27.