Rikker Csaba
Péterfy Sándor Utcai Kórház-Rendelointézet és Baleseti Központ, Fresenius Medical Care Dialízisközpont, Budapest.
Orv Hetil. 2009 Dec 20;150(51):2299-307. doi: 10.1556/OH.2009.28769.
Liver failure carries a high mortality, both the acute type with no pre-existing liver disease (acute liver failure) and the acute decompensation superimposed on a chronic liver disorder (acute on chronic liver failure). Today, liver transplantation still represents the only curative treatment for liver failure due to end-stage liver diseases. Donor organ shortage is still the major limitation and many patients die while awaiting transplantation. Due to the scarcity of donor organs, liver support technologies are being developed to support patients with severe liver failure until either an organ becomes available for transplantation or their livers recover from injury. Early devices including hemodialysis, hemoperfusion, exchange transfusion, cross-hemodialysis, cross-circulation and plasmapheresis appeared inefficient. In the present day, liver support systems' designs fall into two main categories: cell-based, so-called bioartificial and non-cell-based, also known as artificial systems. Bioartificial liver support systems use either porcine hepatocytes or human hepatoma cell lines housed within a hollow-fiber bioreactor. The system perfuses the patient's whole blood or separated plasma through the luminal space in the bioreactor. Theoretically, these methods should optimally resemble normal hepatic tissue structure and function. However, the existing bioartificial systems are far from ideal solution in terms of immunological, infectological, oncological and financial problems and must still be thought of as experimental. The artificial systems are already available for the clinicians in limited quantities. These non-cell-based devices are intended to remove protein-bound and water-soluble toxins without providing synthetic function, which can be partially replaced with substitution of the failing substances (plasma proteins, coagulation factors). These systems include the hemodiabsorption (Liver Dialysis Unit) which is commercially available in the United States, the albumin dialysis which is available in Europe and the newly developed fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (FPSA) system. The simple method of albumin dialysis is "single pass albumin dialysis" (SPAD), which evolved into the so-called "molecular adsorbent recirculating system"(MARS). Prometheus system combines the FPSA method with high-flux hemodialysis. Although the results of many experimental and clinical trials prove the efficacy of the above mentioned methods, large randomized controlled trials are mandatory to establish the impact on survival benefit of artificial and bioartificial support systems versus standard therapy.
肝衰竭死亡率很高,无论是不存在既往肝病的急性型(急性肝衰竭),还是叠加于慢性肝病的急性失代偿(慢加急性肝衰竭)。如今,肝移植仍是终末期肝病所致肝衰竭的唯一治愈性治疗方法。供体器官短缺仍是主要限制因素,许多患者在等待移植过程中死亡。由于供体器官稀缺,正在研发肝支持技术,以支持严重肝衰竭患者,直至有器官可供移植或其肝脏从损伤中恢复。早期的装置包括血液透析、血液灌流、换血、交叉血液透析、交叉循环和血浆置换,这些方法似乎效率不高。目前,肝支持系统的设计主要分为两类:基于细胞的,即所谓的生物人工肝支持系统;非细胞的,也称为人工肝支持系统。生物人工肝支持系统使用猪肝细胞或人肝癌细胞系,置于中空纤维生物反应器内。该系统将患者的全血或分离的血浆通过生物反应器的管腔空间进行灌注。理论上,这些方法应最接近正常肝组织结构和功能。然而,就免疫、感染、肿瘤和经济问题而言,现有的生物人工肝支持系统远非理想解决方案,仍被视为实验性的。人工肝支持系统已限量提供给临床医生。这些非细胞装置旨在去除与蛋白结合的和水溶性毒素,而不提供合成功能,这可以通过替代衰竭物质(血浆蛋白、凝血因子)部分实现。这些系统包括在美国可商业获得的血液透析吸附(肝透析装置)、在欧洲可用的白蛋白透析以及新开发的分级血浆分离吸附(FPSA)系统。白蛋白透析的简单方法是“单次通过白蛋白透析”(SPAD),它演变成了所谓的“分子吸附循环系统”(MARS)。普罗米修斯系统将FPSA方法与高通量血液透析相结合。尽管许多实验和临床试验结果证明了上述方法的有效性,但仍需进行大型随机对照试验,以确定人工肝和生物人工肝支持系统相对于标准治疗对生存获益的影响。