Dipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione (Intensiva e Subintensiva) e Terapia del Dolore, Fondazione IRCCS-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Mangiagalli Regina Elena di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010 Feb;16(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283354723.
In the last 2 years, several reports have dealt with recruitment/positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selection. Most of them confirm previous results and few add new information.
It has been definitely confirmed that opening pressures are different throughout the acute respiratory distress syndrome lung parenchyma, ranging from 5-10 up to 30-40 cmH2O. The highest opening pressures are required to open the most dependent lung regions. It has been found that in 2 s, most of the recruitable lung regions may be open when a proper pressure is applied. The best way to assess recruitment is computed tomography scanning, whereas lung mechanics are a reasonable bedside surrogate. Impedance tomography has been increasingly tested, whereas gas exchange is the less reliable indicator of recruitment. A large outcome study showed that higher PEEP might provide survival benefit in a subgroup of more severe patients as compared with lower PEEP. To set PEEP in each individual patient, the use of the expiratory limb of the pressure-volume curve has been suggested. Setting PEEP according to transpulmonary pressure has a robust physiological background, although it requires confirmatory study.
Indiscriminate application of recruitment maneuver in unselected acute respiratory distress syndrome population does not provide benefits. However, in the most severe patients, recruitment maneuver has to be considered and higher PEEP applied. To individualize PEEP, the expiratory phase has to be considered, and the esophageal pressure measurement to compute the transpulmonary pressure should be progressively introduced in clinical practice.
在过去的 2 年中,已有数项研究涉及到了募集/呼气末正压(PEEP)的选择。其中大部分证实了先前的研究结果,只有少数增加了新的信息。
已明确证实,急性呼吸窘迫综合征肺实质的开启压力存在差异,范围从 5-10 至 30-40cmH2O。需要最高的开启压力来打开最依赖的肺区域。已经发现,当施加适当的压力时,大多数可募集的肺区域可能在 2 秒内打开。评估募集的最佳方法是计算机断层扫描,而肺力学是合理的床边替代方法。阻抗断层扫描已经得到了越来越多的测试,而气体交换是募集的不太可靠的指标。一项大型结局研究表明,与低 PEEP 相比,较高的 PEEP 可能为更严重的亚组患者提供生存获益。为了在每个个体患者中设置 PEEP,可以使用压力-容积曲线的呼气支。根据跨肺压设置 PEEP 具有强大的生理背景,尽管它需要验证性研究。
在未选择的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中,盲目应用募集手法并不能带来益处。然而,在最严重的患者中,需要考虑使用募集手法并应用较高的 PEEP。为了个体化 PEEP,必须考虑呼气阶段,并且应该在临床实践中逐步引入测量食管压力以计算跨肺压的方法。