• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用潜在语义分析和转移概率估计词可预测性对中文阅读中眼动的影响。

Estimating the effect of word predictability on eye movements in Chinese reading using latent semantic analysis and transitional probability.

作者信息

Wang Hsueh-Cheng, Pomplun Marc, Chen Minglei, Ko Hwawei, Rayner Keith

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jul;63(7):1374-86. doi: 10.1080/17470210903380814. Epub 2009 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1080/17470210903380814
PMID:19998069
Abstract

Latent semantic analysis (LSA) and transitional probability (TP), two computational methods used to reflect lexical semantic representation from large text corpora, were employed to examine the effects of word predictability on Chinese reading. Participants' eye movements were monitored, and the influence of word complexity (number of strokes), word frequency, and word predictability on different eye movement measures (first-fixation duration, gaze duration, and total time) were examined. We found influences of TP on first-fixation duration and gaze duration and of LSA on total time. The results suggest that TP reflects an early stage of lexical processing while LSA reflects a later stage.

摘要

潜在语义分析(LSA)和转移概率(TP)是两种用于从大型文本语料库中反映词汇语义表征的计算方法,被用于检验单词可预测性对中文阅读的影响。监测了参与者的眼动情况,并考察了单词复杂度(笔画数)、词频和单词可预测性对不同眼动指标(首次注视持续时间、注视持续时间和总时间)的影响。我们发现TP对首次注视持续时间和注视持续时间有影响,而LSA对总时间有影响。结果表明,TP反映了词汇加工的早期阶段,而LSA反映了后期阶段。

相似文献

1
Estimating the effect of word predictability on eye movements in Chinese reading using latent semantic analysis and transitional probability.使用潜在语义分析和转移概率估计词可预测性对中文阅读中眼动的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jul;63(7):1374-86. doi: 10.1080/17470210903380814. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
2
How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.单词阅读时间和词汇判断时间的相关性有多强?结合来自眼动语料库和大型研究的数据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):563-80. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.658820. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
3
Processing of compound-word characters in reading Chinese: an eye-movement-contingent display change study.阅读中文时复合字的加工:一项眼动伴随显示变化研究
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):527-47. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.667423. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
4
Parafoveal processing in silent and oral reading: Reading mode influences the relative weighting of phonological and semantic information in Chinese.默读和朗读中的副中央凹加工:阅读模式影响汉语中语音和语义信息的相对权重。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Aug;42(8):1257-73. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000242. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
5
The effects of reading comprehension and launch site on frequency-predictability interactions during paragraph reading.阅读理解和起始位置对段落阅读过程中频率 - 可预测性交互作用的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(6):1151-65. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.848216. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
6
Lack of contextual-word predictability during reading in patients with mild Alzheimer disease.轻度阿尔茨海默病患者阅读时缺乏上下文单词可预测性。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Sep;62:143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.023. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
7
The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading.语境多样性对阅读中眼球运动的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):275-83. doi: 10.1037/a0034058. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
8
How fast can predictability influence word skipping during reading?预测能力能多快影响阅读时的单词略读?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jul;39(4):1054-63. doi: 10.1037/a0030909. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
9
The impact of text repetition on content and function words during reading: further evidence from eye movements.阅读过程中文本重复对实义词和功能词的影响:来自眼动的进一步证据。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Jun;67(2):94-9. doi: 10.1037/a0028288. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
10
Task effects on eye movements during reading.阅读时任务对眼球运动的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Nov;36(6):1561-6. doi: 10.1037/a0020693.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral reading promotes predictive processing in Chinese sentence reading: eye movement evidence.口语阅读促进中文句子阅读中的预测加工:眼动证据。
PeerJ. 2024 Oct 17;12:e18307. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18307. eCollection 2024.
2
Individual word representations dissociate from linguistic context along a cortical unimodal to heteromodal gradient.个体单词的表示形式沿着皮质单模态到异模态梯度与语言语境分离。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Feb 1;45(2):e26607. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26607.
3
The graded predictive pre-activation in Chinese sentence reading: evidence from eye movements.
中文句子阅读中的分级预测性预激活:来自眼动的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1136488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136488. eCollection 2023.
4
Semantic feature activation takes time: longer SOA elicits earlier priming effects during reading.语义特征激活需要时间:在阅读过程中,较长的 SOA 会引发更早的启动效应。
Cogn Process. 2022 May;23(2):309-318. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01084-3. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
Language Models Explain Word Reading Times Better Than Empirical Predictability.语言模型比经验可预测性能更好地解释单词阅读时间。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Feb 2;4:730570. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.730570. eCollection 2021.
6
A further look at ageing and word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from one-character words.进一步探讨中文阅读中的老化和词汇可预测性效应:来自单字的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jan;74(1):68-76. doi: 10.1177/1747021820951131. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
7
Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eye-movement control during reading.语言加工并不胜过视动限制,但它们可以调节眼球运动的位置,而不考虑单词边界:阅读过程中自上而下的基于单词的眼动控制的证据被否定。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 22;14(7):e0219666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219666. eCollection 2019.
8
Encoding the target or the plausible preview word? The nature of the plausibility preview benefit in reading Chinese.编码目标词还是似是而非的预视词?中文阅读中似是而非预视效应的本质
Vis cogn. 2014 Jan 1;22(2):193-213. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2014.890689.
9
The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading.语境多样性对阅读中眼球运动的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):275-83. doi: 10.1037/a0034058. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
10
Predicting raters' transparency judgments of English and Chinese morphological constituents using latent semantic analysis.使用潜在语义分析预测评分者对英语和汉语形态成分的透明度判断。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):284-306. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0360-z.