Rutter Ben
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73117, USA.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2009 Dec;23(12):887-900. doi: 10.3109/02699200903062303.
This paper presents some findings from a case study of repair sequences in conversations between a dysarthric speaker, Chris, and her interactional partners. It adopts the methodology of interactional phonetics, where turn design, sequence organization, and variation in phonetic parameters are analysed in unison. The analysis focused on the use of segmental and prosodic variation found during attempts by Chris to repair a previously identified trouble source. The results indicate that trouble sources were extremely common in the recorded conversations, but that repair attempts were almost always communicatively successful. Analysis of the fragments revealed that repair sequences are often collaborative achievements, with the participant's conversational partners signalling the specific trouble source within a turn, or providing feedback about repair attempts. It was also observed that successful repair attempts were not always simple repetitions of the trouble source, but varied in other linguistic areas. It is suggested that intelligibility repairs should be studied using both experimental and qualitative methods.
本文介绍了一项针对构音障碍患者克里斯与其互动伙伴对话中修复序列的案例研究的一些发现。它采用互动语音学的方法,同时分析话轮设计、序列组织和语音参数的变化。分析重点关注克里斯在尝试修复先前确定的问题源时发现的音段和韵律变化的使用情况。结果表明,问题源在录音对话中极为常见,但修复尝试几乎总是在交流上取得成功。对片段的分析表明,修复序列往往是协作的成果,参与者的对话伙伴会在一个话轮内指出具体的问题源,或对修复尝试提供反馈。还观察到,成功的修复尝试并不总是对问题源的简单重复,而是在其他语言领域有所变化。建议使用实验和定性方法来研究可懂度修复。