Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Dec;11(12):819-25. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0074.
Previous studies have found positive bias and frequent outliers when central venous catheter (CVC) whole blood is used to dose glucose meters. We designed a study to determine whether positive bias and outliers with CVC whole blood glucose samples are due to exogenous glucose contamination of CVC samples, inherent bias and imprecision of glucose meters, or properties of CVC whole blood that interfere with the function of some glucose meters.
We studied the relationship between venous whole blood and venous plasma glucose drawn by venipuncture to CVC whole blood and CVC plasma glucose in 50 hospitalized patients. In 27 patients whole blood glucose was measured on both the Accu-Chek Inform (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) and StatStrip (Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA).
By comparing CVC plasma to venous plasma glucose, we determined that contamination of CVC samples with exogenous glucose was uncommon. On the Inform meter outliers were approximately twice as common with CVC whole blood compared to venous whole blood. In 27 patients who had CVC whole blood analyzed by both Inform and StatStrip, outliers occurred approximately twice as often on the Inform compared to the StatStrip. Accounting for CVC samples contaminated with exogenous glucose, outliers on the StatStrip did not occur significantly more often using CVC whole blood compared to venous whole blood.
Properties unique to CVC whole blood differentially affect glucose meter bias and imprecision. Device selection is critical in practices that wish to use CVC whole blood to monitor glucose concentration in hospitalized patients.
之前的研究发现,当使用中心静脉导管(CVC)全血来给血糖仪定标时,会出现正偏差和频繁的异常值。我们设计了一项研究,旨在确定 CVC 全血葡萄糖样本中的正偏差和异常值是否归因于 CVC 样本中外源性葡萄糖的污染、血糖仪固有的偏差和不精密度,还是 CVC 全血的特性干扰了某些血糖仪的功能。
我们研究了 50 名住院患者的 CVC 全血和 CVC 血浆葡萄糖与静脉全血和静脉血浆葡萄糖之间的关系。在 27 名患者中,我们同时使用 Accu-Chek Inform(罗氏诊断公司,印第安纳波利斯,IN)和 StatStrip(Nova Biomedical,沃尔瑟姆,MA)测量全血葡萄糖。
通过比较 CVC 血浆与静脉血浆葡萄糖,我们确定 CVC 样本中外源性葡萄糖的污染并不常见。与静脉全血相比,在 Inform 血糖仪上,CVC 全血的异常值大约多了两倍。在 27 名同时使用 Inform 和 StatStrip 分析 CVC 全血的患者中,与 StatStrip 相比,Inform 上的异常值大约多了两倍。考虑到 CVC 样本被外源性葡萄糖污染,StatStrip 上的异常值在使用 CVC 全血与静脉全血时并没有显著更频繁地出现。
CVC 全血的独特特性会对血糖仪的偏差和不精密度产生不同的影响。在希望使用 CVC 全血监测住院患者血糖浓度的实践中,设备选择至关重要。