Suppr超能文献

手机电磁场对脑电活动的影响:文献的批判性分析

The effects of mobile-phone electromagnetic fields on brain electrical activity: a critical analysis of the literature.

作者信息

Marino Andrew A, Carrubba Simona

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA 71130-3932, USA.

出版信息

Electromagn Biol Med. 2009;28(3):250-74. doi: 10.3109/15368370902918912.

Abstract

We analyzed the reports in which human brain electrical activity was compared between the presence and absence of radio-frequency and low-frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from mobile phones, or between pre- and post-exposure to the EMFs. Of 55 reports, 37 claimed and 18 denied an EMF-induced effect on either the baseline electro encephalogram (EEG), or on cognitive processing of visual or auditory stimuli as reflected in changes in event-related potentials. The positive reports did not adequately consider the family-wise error rate, the presence of spike artifacts in the EEG, or the confounding role of the two different EMFs. The negative reports contained neither positive controls nor power analyses. Almost all reports were based on the incorrect assumption that the brain was in equilibrium with its surroundings. Overall, the doubt regarding the existence of reproducible mobile-phone EMFs on brain activity created by the reports appeared to legitimate the knowledge claims of the mobile-phone industry. However, it funded, partly or wholly, at least 87% of the reports. From an analysis of their cognitive framework, the common use of disclaimers, the absence of information concerning conflicts of interest, and the industry's donations to the principal EMF journal, we inferred that the doubt was manufactured by the industry. The crucial scientific question of the pathophysiology of mobile-phone EMFs as reflected in measurements of brain electrical activity remains unanswered, and essentially unaddressed.

摘要

我们分析了一些报告,这些报告比较了在存在和不存在手机发出的射频和低频电磁场(EMF)的情况下,或者在暴露于EMF之前和之后的人脑电活动。在55份报告中,37份声称存在EMF对基线脑电图(EEG)或对事件相关电位变化所反映的视觉或听觉刺激的认知处理有影响,18份则予以否认。阳性报告没有充分考虑家族性错误率、EEG中尖峰伪迹的存在或两种不同EMF的混杂作用。阴性报告既没有阳性对照也没有功效分析。几乎所有报告都基于一个错误的假设,即大脑与其周围环境处于平衡状态。总体而言,这些报告引发的关于手机EMF对大脑活动是否存在可重复影响的疑问,似乎使手机行业的知识主张变得合理。然而,该行业至少部分或全部资助了87%的报告。通过对其认知框架、免责声明的普遍使用、缺乏利益冲突信息以及该行业对主要EMF期刊的捐赠进行分析,我们推断这种疑问是由该行业制造的。手机EMF病理生理学在脑电活动测量中所反映的关键科学问题仍然没有答案,而且基本上没有得到解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验