Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, U.K.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 Aug;85(3):453-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00110.x. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
Eukaryotic flagella and cilia have a remarkably uniform internal 'engine' known as the '9+2' axoneme. With few exceptions, the function of cilia and flagella is to beat rhythmically and set up relative motion between themselves and the liquid that surrounds them. The molecular basis of axonemal movement is understood in considerable detail, with the exception of the mechanism that provides its rhythmical or oscillatory quality. Some kind of repetitive 'switching' event is assumed to occur; there are several proposals regarding the nature of the 'switch' and how it might operate. Herein I first summarise all the factors known to influence the rate of the oscillation (the beating frequency). Many of these factors exert their effect through modulating the mean sliding velocity between the nine doublet microtubules of the axoneme, this velocity being the determinant of bend growth rate and bend propagation rate. Then I explain six proposed mechanisms for flagellar oscillation and review the evidence on which they are based. Finally, I attempt to derive an economical synthesis, drawing for preference on experimental research that has been minimally disruptive of the intricate structure of the axoneme. The 'provisional synthesis' is that flagellar oscillation emerges from an effect of passive sliding direction on the dynein arms. Sliding in one direction facilitates force-generating cycles and dynein-to-dynein synchronisation along a doublet; sliding in the other direction is inhibitory. The direction of the initial passive sliding normally oscillates because it is controlled hydrodynamically through the alternating direction of the propulsive thrust. However, in the absence of such regulation, there can be a perpetual, mechanical self-triggering through a reversal of sliding direction due to the recoil of elastic structures that deform as a response to the prior active sliding. This provisional synthesis may be a useful basis for further examination of the problem.
真核生物的鞭毛和纤毛具有一种非常统一的内部“引擎”,称为“9+2”轴丝。除了少数例外,纤毛和鞭毛的功能是有节奏地摆动,并在它们自身和周围液体之间建立相对运动。轴丝运动的分子基础已经有了相当详细的了解,除了提供其节奏或振荡质量的机制之外。人们假设会发生某种重复的“开关”事件;关于“开关”的性质以及它如何运作,有几种建议。在此,我首先总结了所有已知影响摆动(拍打频率)速率的因素。其中许多因素通过调节轴丝中九个二联体微管之间的平均滑动速度来发挥作用,该速度是弯曲生长速度和弯曲传播速度的决定因素。然后,我解释了六种拟议的鞭毛振荡机制,并回顾了它们所依据的证据。最后,我试图做出一个经济的综合,优先考虑对轴丝复杂结构干扰最小的实验研究。“暂定综合”是指鞭毛的振荡源自于被动滑动方向对动力蛋白臂的影响。向一个方向滑动有利于产生力的循环和沿着二联体的动力蛋白同步;向另一个方向滑动则具有抑制作用。初始被动滑动的方向通常会发生振荡,因为它通过推进力的交替方向在水动力上得到控制。然而,在没有这种调节的情况下,由于弹性结构的回弹,由于先前的主动滑动而变形的结构会发生滑动方向的反转,从而产生永久性的、机械性的自我触发。这个暂定综合可能是进一步研究这个问题的有用基础。