Servicio Autónomo Centro Amazónico para la Investigación y Control de Enfermedades Tropicales, Simón Bolívar' (SACAICET), Puerto Ayacucho, Estado Amazonas, Venezuela.
Malar J. 2009 Dec 11;8:291. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-291.
While the federal state of Amazonas bears the highest risk for malaria in Venezuela (2007: 68.4 cases/1000 inhabitants), little comprehensive information about the malaria situation is available from this area. The purpose of this rapid malaria appraisal (RMA) was to provide baseline data about malaria and malaria control in Amazonas.
The RMA methodology corresponds to a rapid health impact assessment (HIA) as described in the 1999 Gothenburg consensus. In conjunction with the actors of the malaria surveillance system, all useful data and information, which were accessible within a limited time-frame of five visits to Amazonas, were collected, analysed and interpreted.
Mortality from malaria is low (< 1 in 105) and slide positivity rates have stayed at the same level for the last two decades (15% +/- 6% (SD)). Active case detection accounts for ca. 40% of slides taken. The coverage of the censured population with malaria notification points (NPs) has been achieved in recent years. The main parasite is Plasmodium vivax (84% of cases). The proportion of Plasmodium falciparum is on the decline, possibly driven by the introduction of cost-free artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) (1988: 33.4%; 2007: 15.4%). Monitoring and documentation is complete, systematic and consistent, but poorly digitalized. Malaria transmission displayed a visible lag behind rainfall in the capital municipality of Atures, but not in the other municipalities. In comparison to reference microscopy, quality of field microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) is suboptimal (kappa < 0.75). Hot spots of malaria risk were seen in some indigenous ethnic groups. Conflicting strategies in respect of training of community health workers (CHW) and the introduction of new diagnostic tools (RDTs) were observed.
Malaria control is possible, even in tropical rain forest areas, if the health system is working adequately. Interventions have to be carefully designed and the features of the particular local Latin American context considered.
在委内瑞拉,亚马逊州是疟疾风险最高的联邦州(2007 年:68.4 例/1000 居民),但有关该地区疟疾情况的综合信息却很少。本次快速疟疾评估(RMA)的目的是提供亚马逊州疟疾和疟疾控制的基线数据。
RMA 方法符合 1999 年哥德堡共识中描述的快速健康影响评估(HIA)。与疟疾监测系统的参与者一起,在五次访问亚马逊州的有限时间框架内,收集、分析和解释了所有可用的数据和信息。
疟疾死亡率很低(<1/105),过去二十年的涂片阳性率保持在同一水平(15%+/-6%(SD))。主动病例检出约占所取涂片的 40%。近年来,疟疾通报点(NPs)覆盖了被监测的人口。主要寄生虫是间日疟原虫(84%的病例)。恶性疟原虫的比例呈下降趋势,可能是由于免费青蒿素为基础的联合疗法(ACT)的引入(1988 年:33.4%;2007 年:15.4%)。监测和记录完整、系统且一致,但数字化程度较差。在阿图雷斯首府市,疟疾传播明显滞后于降雨,但在其他市则不然。与参考显微镜相比,现场显微镜和快速诊断检测(RDT)的质量较差(kappa<0.75)。在一些土著族群中发现了疟疾风险的热点。在社区卫生工作者(CHW)的培训和新诊断工具(RDT)的引入方面,存在相互冲突的策略。
如果卫生系统运作良好,即使在热带雨林地区,疟疾控制也是可能的。必须精心设计干预措施,并考虑到特定的拉丁美洲地方特色。