Systematic review and meta-analysis of the used surgical techniques to reduce leg lymphedema following radical inguinal nodes dissection.

BACKGROUND

Inguinal nodes dissection is associated with high rates of morbidity, lymphedema in particular is a chronic disabling condition which is a common complication following this operation. Prevention or minimization of this condition is an important aim when considering this procedure. Many technical modifications are suggested for this purpose. This systematic review aims at assessing the efficacy of the available strategies to reduce the risk and severity of leg lymphedema.

METHODS

For this review, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify studies that reported surgical strategies designed to reduce complications of groin dissection and in particular leg lymphedema. Studies that reported outcome of long saphenous vein sparing, fascia preserving dissection, microvascular surgery, sartorius transposition and omental pedicle flap were located. Data were collected using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A combined odds ratio was calculated combining studies suitable for meta-analysis using the random effect model.

RESULTS

The search result defined few studies that reported results of saphenous vein sparing technique; some of those studies were found suitable for meta-analysis based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomized studies. The meta-analysis showed significant reduction of lymphedema (odds ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.53) and other complications of inguinal node dissection. There were no randomized studies to address this problem; there are also isolated studies that reported benefits of other techniques but none of them was suitable for meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis of the reported studies on sparing the long saphenous vein in inguinal nodes dissection suggests a reduced rate of lymphedema and other postoperative complications. Other methods that may be beneficial are fascia preserving dissection, pedicled omental flap and microsurgery; however sartorius transposition has not been shown to reduce the rate of complications. Randomized controlled trials are needed to prove the benefits of various technical modifications.