Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, G89 Salk Hall, 3501 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2009 Dec;73(12):1379-86.
A mail survey of 2003-07 dental school graduates was undertaken by the Department of Anesthesiology at the University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the predoctoral curriculum in anesthesia and to determine the preparedness of practicing dentists to provide anesthesia services for their dental patients. Subsets of the survey responses were created to specifically evaluate the effectiveness of an advanced selective program in sedation offered to approximately twenty third- and fourth-year predoctoral students. This fourteen-month Anesthesia Selective Program provides advanced didactic instruction and clinical experiences needed to establish competence in minimal to moderate sedation. Overall, graduates reported being best prepared in assessment of medical histories, physiology, and pharmacology, while being least prepared in oral sedation, intravenous sedation, and general anesthesia. For graduates currently in general practice, those who had participated in the Anesthesia Selective Program reported being better prepared in most subjects relating to anesthesia and patient care. Participants in the selective were also more likely to treat special needs patients in their private practices. Respondents' written comments indicated a desire for a greater number of clinical experiences involving sedation procedures within the predoctoral curriculum. This outcome assessment indicated that a greater emphasis should be placed on instruction and training experiences for enteral sedation within the predoctoral dental curriculum. Advanced training and increased clinical experiences in anesthesia may also be an effective means to better prepare graduates to assess medical histories, to manage medical emergencies, and to be willing to treat medically complex patients as well as patients with special health care needs.
匹兹堡大学牙医学院麻醉学系对 2003-07 届牙科学校毕业生进行了邮件调查,以评估麻醉学博士前课程的优缺点,并确定执业牙医为其牙科患者提供麻醉服务的准备情况。调查回复的子集中专门评估了为大约二十名三、四年级的博士生提供的高级选择性镇静计划的效果。这个为期 14 个月的麻醉选择性计划提供了先进的理论教学和临床经验,以建立在最小至中度镇静方面的能力。总的来说,毕业生报告说在评估病史、生理学和药理学方面准备得最好,而在口腔镇静、静脉镇静和全身麻醉方面准备得最差。对于目前从事普通牙科的毕业生来说,那些参加过麻醉选择性计划的人报告说在与麻醉和患者护理相关的大多数科目上准备得更好。选择性计划的参与者也更有可能在他们的私人诊所中治疗特殊需求的患者。受访者的书面评论表明,希望在博士前课程中增加更多涉及镇静程序的临床经验。这种结果评估表明,应该更加重视博士前牙科课程中肠内镇静的指导和培训经验。在麻醉方面的高级培训和更多的临床经验也可能是更好地准备毕业生评估病史、管理医疗紧急情况以及愿意治疗医疗复杂患者和有特殊医疗需求的患者的有效手段。