• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证评估 1 型糖尿病青少年碳水化合物和胰岛素剂量知识的问卷。

Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess carbohydrate and insulin-dosing knowledge in youth with type 1 diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):457-62. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0390. Epub 2009 Dec 10.

DOI:10.2337/dc09-0390
PMID:20007940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2827488/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE The American Diabetes Association advocates insulin regimens for youth with type 1 diabetes that involve adjusting insulin dose based on carbohydrate intake and blood glucose level. Implementing these regimens requires knowledge about carbohydrate content of foods and subsequent calculations of insulin dose, skills that may be difficult to gauge in practice. Therefore, we sought to develop and validate a questionnaire, the PedCarbQuiz (PCQ), to assess carbohydrate and insulin-dosing knowledge in youth with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS After development by an expert panel, the PCQ was administered to 75 youth with type 1 diabetes or their parents. Reliability was assessed by Cronbach alpha and split-half testing. To assess validity, scores were correlated with A1C, expert assessments, parent educational level, and complexity of insulin regimen. RESULTS PCQ mean score was 87 +/- 9.7% (range 42-98%). Cronbach alpha was 0.88, and correlation of split halves was 0.59 (P < 0.0001). Higher PCQ scores correlated significantly with lower A1C (r = -0.29, P = 0.01) and expert assessments (r = 0.56, P < 0.001). Scores were significantly higher in parents with college degrees than in those without (P = 0.01) and in participants with more complex insulin regimens (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS The PCQ is a novel, easily administered instrument to assess knowledge about carbohydrates and insulin dosing calculations. Initial analyses support the reliability and validity of the PCQ.

摘要

目的 美国糖尿病协会提倡 1 型糖尿病青少年采用基于碳水化合物摄入量和血糖水平调整胰岛素剂量的胰岛素方案。实施这些方案需要了解食物的碳水化合物含量,并随后计算胰岛素剂量,这些技能在实践中可能难以评估。因此,我们试图开发和验证一种问卷,即 PedCarbQuiz(PCQ),以评估 1 型糖尿病青少年的碳水化合物和胰岛素给药知识。

研究设计和方法 在专家小组的开发之后,向 75 名 1 型糖尿病患者或其父母施行了 PCQ。通过 Cronbach α 和半分割测试评估可靠性。为了评估有效性,将分数与 A1C、专家评估、父母教育水平和胰岛素方案的复杂性相关联。

结果 PCQ 的平均得分为 87 +/- 9.7%(范围为 42-98%)。Cronbach α 为 0.88,两半分割的相关性为 0.59(P < 0.0001)。较高的 PCQ 分数与较低的 A1C(r = -0.29,P = 0.01)和专家评估(r = 0.56,P < 0.001)显著相关。具有大学学历的父母的分数明显高于没有大学学历的父母(P = 0.01),并且在胰岛素方案更复杂的参与者中(P = 0.003)分数更高。

结论 PCQ 是一种新颖的、易于管理的工具,可用于评估碳水化合物和胰岛素剂量计算的知识。初步分析支持 PCQ 的可靠性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e5/2827488/d112139b74b5/zdc0031080870001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e5/2827488/d112139b74b5/zdc0031080870001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e5/2827488/d112139b74b5/zdc0031080870001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess carbohydrate and insulin-dosing knowledge in youth with type 1 diabetes.开发和验证评估 1 型糖尿病青少年碳水化合物和胰岛素剂量知识的问卷。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):457-62. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0390. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
2
Impact of a Serious Videogame Designed for Flexible Insulin Therapy on the Knowledge and Behaviors of Children with Type 1 Diabetes: The LUDIDIAB Pilot Study.一款专为灵活胰岛素治疗设计的严肃电子游戏对1型糖尿病儿童知识与行为的影响:LUDIDIAB试点研究
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Feb;18(2):52-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0227. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
3
A Time-Friendly, Feasible Measure of Nutrition Knowledge in Type 1 Diabetes: The Electronic Nutrition and Carbohydrate Counting Quiz (eNCQ).一种适用于1型糖尿病患者的、节省时间且可行的营养知识测评方法:电子营养与碳水化合物计数测验(eNCQ)。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Jan;13(1):68-74. doi: 10.1177/1932296818778608. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
4
Reliability and Validity of a Carbohydrate-Counting Knowledge Questionnaire for Young Australians With Type 1 Diabetes.澳大利亚 1 型糖尿病青少年碳水化合物计数知识问卷的信度和效度。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021 Jul;53(7):614-618. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
5
Development and validation of the type 1 diabetes nutrition knowledge survey.1 型糖尿病营养知识调查问卷的编制与验证。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Aug;35(8):1643-7. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2371. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
6
Knowledge of carbohydrate counting and insulin dose calculations in paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.1型糖尿病患儿碳水化合物计数及胰岛素剂量计算的知识
BBA Clin. 2015 Sep 15;4:99-101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbacli.2015.09.002. eCollection 2015 Dec.
7
The effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin pumps with continuous glucose monitoring in outpatient adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review.持续皮下胰岛素泵联合持续血糖监测在门诊1型糖尿病青少年患者中的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-10. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-170.
8
One potato, two potato,… assessing carbohydrate counting accuracy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.一个土豆,两个土豆,…评估 1 型糖尿病青少年的碳水化合物计数准确性。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Nov;19(7):1302-1308. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12717. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
9
Carbohydrate intake and insulin requirement in children, adolescents and young adults with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: A multicenter comparison to type 1 diabetes.患有囊性纤维化相关糖尿病的儿童、青少年和年轻成年人的碳水化合物摄入量与胰岛素需求:与1型糖尿病的多中心比较。
Clin Nutr. 2015 Aug;34(4):732-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.08.016. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
10
The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test.一项简短糖尿病知识测试的信度和效度
Diabetes Care. 1998 May;21(5):706-10. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.5.706.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of diabetes knowledge, hypoglycaemia awareness, and adherence to insulin pen usage practices among diabetic patients: a cross-sectional study of determinants and educational needs.糖尿病患者的糖尿病知识、低血糖认知及胰岛素笔使用依从性评估:一项关于决定因素和教育需求的横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):2305. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23566-7.
2
First validity testing of GluciQuizz, a French self-questionnaire evaluating carb-counting for patients with type 1 diabetes.对GluciQuizz进行首次效度测试,GluciQuizz是一份用于评估1型糖尿病患者碳水化合物计数情况的法国自填式问卷。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0318746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318746. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing literacy and numeracy to improve diabetes care: two randomized controlled trials.解决读写和计算能力问题以改善糖尿病护理:两项随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Dec;32(12):2149-55. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0563. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
2
Development and validation of the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT).糖尿病算术测试(DNT)的开发与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 May 1;8:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-96.
3
Dietary behaviors predict glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes.饮食行为可预测1型糖尿病青少年的血糖控制情况。
Assessing Carbohydrate Counting Accuracy: Current Limitations and Future Directions.
评估碳水化合物计数的准确性:当前的局限性和未来的方向。
Nutrients. 2024 Jul 9;16(14):2183. doi: 10.3390/nu16142183.
4
Effects of basic carbohydrate counting versus standard dietary care for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes (The BCC Study): a randomised, controlled trial.基础碳水化合物计数与标准饮食护理对 2 型糖尿病血糖控制的影响(BCC 研究):一项随机对照试验。
Nutr Diabetes. 2024 Jun 27;14(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41387-024-00307-0.
5
Development and validation of patient diabetes knowledge questionnaire (PDKQ).患者糖尿病知识问卷(PDKQ)的编制与验证
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Oct 19;16(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00631-3.
6
Evaluation of carbohydrate counting knowledge among individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯1型糖尿病患者碳水化合物计数知识评估:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2022 Nov 28;5(2):344-351. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000553. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Pregnant Women Have Poor Carbohydrate Knowledge and Do Not Receive Adequate Nutrition Education.孕妇碳水化合物知识匮乏,且未接受足够的营养教育。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Jun;25(6):909-918. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03123-5. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
8
"Counting Carbs to Be in Charge": A Comparison of an Internet-Based Education Module With In-Class Education in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes.“计算碳水化合物摄入量以掌控病情”:针对 1 型糖尿病青少年的基于互联网的教育模块与课堂教育的比较
Clin Diabetes. 2021 Jan;39(1):80-87. doi: 10.2337/cd20-0060.
9
Checklists for Assessing Skills of Children With Type 1 Diabetes on Insulin Injection Technique.胰岛素注射技术评估 1 型糖尿病患儿技能的检查表。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 May;16(3):742-750. doi: 10.1177/1932296820984771. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
10
Carbohydrate Counting App Using Image Recognition for Youth With Type 1 Diabetes: Pilot Randomized Control Trial.基于图像识别的 1 型糖尿病青少年碳水化合物计数应用:试验性随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 28;8(10):e22074. doi: 10.2196/22074.
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jul;31(7):1318-20. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2435. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
4
Assessing regimen adherence of adolescents with type 1 diabetes.评估1型糖尿病青少年的治疗方案依从性。
Diabetes Care. 2006 Oct;29(10):2263-7. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0685.
5
Diabetes self-management profile for flexible insulin regimens: cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of psychometric properties in a pediatric sample.灵活胰岛素治疗方案的糖尿病自我管理概况:儿科样本中心理测量学特性的横断面和纵向分析
Diabetes Care. 2005 Aug;28(8):2034-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.8.2034.
6
Benefits of an insulin dosage calculation device for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus.胰岛素剂量计算装置对1型糖尿病青少年的益处。
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Dec;17(12):1641-51. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2004.17.12.1641.
7
Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a statement of the American Diabetes Association.1型糖尿病儿童及青少年的护理:美国糖尿病协会声明
Diabetes Care. 2005 Jan;28(1):186-212. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.1.186.
8
Socioeconomic position and health among persons with diabetes mellitus: a conceptual framework and review of the literature.糖尿病患者的社会经济地位与健康:一个概念框架及文献综述
Epidemiol Rev. 2004;26:63-77. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxh002.
9
Evidence-based nutrition principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related complications.基于证据的营养原则及糖尿病及其相关并发症治疗与预防的建议
Diabetes Care. 2003 Jan;26 Suppl 1:S51-61. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s51.
10
The ADKnowl: identifying knowledge deficits in diabetes care.ADKnowl:识别糖尿病护理中的知识缺陷。
Diabet Med. 2001 Aug;18(8):626-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00537.x.