• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个土豆,两个土豆,…评估 1 型糖尿病青少年的碳水化合物计数准确性。

One potato, two potato,… assessing carbohydrate counting accuracy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Nov;19(7):1302-1308. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12717. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1111/pedi.12717
PMID:29999219
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Carbohydrate (CHO) counting is a recommended daily practice to help manage blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes. Evidence suggests that CHO estimates should be within 10 to 15 g of the actual meal for optimal postprandial blood glucose control. The objective of this study was to assess accuracy of CHO counting in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

Adolescents (aged 12-18 years) with type 1 diabetes who self-identified as regular CHO counters were recruited from the SickKids Diabetes Clinic, Toronto, Canada. Adolescents completed the PedsCarbQuiz (PCQ) and estimated CHO content of test trays (three meals and three snack trays) that were randomly assigned. Analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with accuracy of counting and CHO counting knowledge (PCQ score).

RESULTS

A total of 140 adolescents (78 females, mean age 14.7, SD = 1.8) participated. The average PCQ score was 81 ± 10%. Forty-two percent of adolescents were accurate in estimating meal trays (ie, within 10 g of the actual CHO content), 44% estimated inaccurately (within 10-20 g), while 14% were significantly inaccurate counters (>20 g variation). PCQ scores were higher in teens who CHO counted accurately than in those with significant inaccuracy (>20 g) (P < 0.05), and a longer duration of diabetes corresponded significantly with a lower PCQ score. No demographics correlated significantly with CHO counting accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Less than half of the teens in our study were accurate CHO counters. These results indicate the need for regular clinical accuracy check and reeducation.

摘要

背景/目的:碳水化合物(CHO)计数是一种推荐的日常实践,有助于控制 1 型糖尿病患者的血糖水平。有证据表明,为了获得最佳的餐后血糖控制,CHO 估计值应与实际餐食相差 10 至 15 克。本研究的目的是评估 1 型糖尿病青少年 CHO 计数的准确性。

方法

从加拿大多伦多的 SickKids 糖尿病诊所招募了自认为是常规 CHO 计数者的 12-18 岁青少年 1 型糖尿病患者。青少年完成了 PedsCarbQuiz(PCQ)并估计了随机分配的测试托盘(三餐和三顿零食托盘)的 CHO 含量。进行了分析,以确定与计数准确性和 CHO 计数知识(PCQ 得分)相关的因素。

结果

共有 140 名青少年(78 名女性,平均年龄 14.7 ± 1.8 岁)参加了研究。平均 PCQ 得分为 81 ± 10%。42%的青少年准确估计了餐盘(即与实际 CHO 含量相差 10 克以内),44%估计不准确(在 10-20 克之间),而 14%则明显不准确(相差>20 克)。准确估计 CHO 的青少年的 PCQ 得分高于明显不准确(相差>20 克)的青少年(P < 0.05),糖尿病的病程与 PCQ 得分呈显著负相关。没有任何人口统计学特征与 CHO 计数准确性显著相关。

结论

我们研究中的青少年中,不到一半是准确的 CHO 计数者。这些结果表明需要定期进行临床准确性检查和再教育。

相似文献

1
One potato, two potato,… assessing carbohydrate counting accuracy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.一个土豆,两个土豆,…评估 1 型糖尿病青少年的碳水化合物计数准确性。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Nov;19(7):1302-1308. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12717. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
2
Accurate Carbohydrate Counting Is an Important Determinant of Postprandial Glycemia in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes on Insulin Pump Therapy.准确的碳水化合物计数是接受胰岛素泵治疗的1型糖尿病儿童和青少年餐后血糖的重要决定因素。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):753-758. doi: 10.1177/1932296816679850. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
3
Can children with Type 1 diabetes and their caregivers estimate the carbohydrate content of meals and snacks?1 型糖尿病患儿及其照护者能否估计餐食和零食中的碳水化合物含量?
Diabet Med. 2010 Mar;27(3):348-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02945.x.
4
Children and adolescents on intensive insulin therapy maintain postprandial glycaemic control without precise carbohydrate counting.接受强化胰岛素治疗的儿童和青少年在不精确计算碳水化合物摄入量的情况下也能维持餐后血糖控制。
Diabet Med. 2009 Mar;26(3):279-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02669.x.
5
Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management.建模 1 型糖尿病管理中的碳水化合物计数错误。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Oct;22(10):749-759. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0502. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
6
Altering source or amount of dietary carbohydrate has acute and chronic effects on postprandial glucose and triglycerides in type 2 diabetes: Canadian trial of Carbohydrates in Diabetes (CCD).改变饮食中碳水化合物的来源或数量对 2 型糖尿病患者餐后血糖和甘油三酯有急性和慢性影响:加拿大糖尿病碳水化合物试验(CCD)。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Mar;23(3):227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2011.12.011. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
7
Carbohydrate Estimation by a Mobile Phone-Based System Versus Self-Estimations of Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Comparative Study.基于手机系统的碳水化合物估算与1型糖尿病患者的自我估算:一项对比研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 11;18(5):e101. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5567.
8
A Comparative Study on Carbohydrate Estimation: GoCARB vs. Dietitians.碳水化合物估算的比较研究:GoCARB 与营养师。
Nutrients. 2018 Jun 7;10(6):741. doi: 10.3390/nu10060741.
9
Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess carbohydrate and insulin-dosing knowledge in youth with type 1 diabetes.开发和验证评估 1 型糖尿病青少年碳水化合物和胰岛素剂量知识的问卷。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):457-62. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0390. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
10
Teaching and training programme on carbohydrate counting in Type 1 diabetic patients.1型糖尿病患者碳水化合物计数教学与培训项目
Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2001 Oct;14(5):259-67.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the Gap in Carbohydrate Counting With a Mobile App: Needs Assessment Survey.通过移动应用弥合碳水化合物计数差距:需求评估调查
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 28;27:e63278. doi: 10.2196/63278.
2
Assessing Carbohydrate Counting Accuracy: Current Limitations and Future Directions.评估碳水化合物计数的准确性:当前的局限性和未来的方向。
Nutrients. 2024 Jul 9;16(14):2183. doi: 10.3390/nu16142183.
3
Chinese Guidelines for Medical Nutrition Therapy for Patients with Diabetes (2022 Edition).中国糖尿病医学营养治疗指南(2022 年版)。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2024 Jun;33(2):118-152. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.202406_33(2).0001.
4
In Silico Validation of Personalized Safe Intervals for Carbohydrate Counting Errors.基于计算机的个体化碳水化合物计数错误安全区间验证。
Nutrients. 2023 Sep 22;15(19):4110. doi: 10.3390/nu15194110.
5
Too Much Dietary Flexibility May Hinder, Not Help: Could More Specific Targets for Daily Food Intake Distribution Promote Glycemic Management among Youth with Type 1 Diabetes?饮食过于灵活可能适得其反:对于 1 型糖尿病青少年,更具体的每日食物摄入量分配目标能否促进血糖管理?
Nutrients. 2022 Feb 16;14(4):824. doi: 10.3390/nu14040824.
6
Dietary Aspects to Incorporate in the Creation of a Mobile Image-Based Dietary Assessment Tool to Manage and Improve Diabetes.将饮食因素纳入移动图像为基础的饮食评估工具的创建中,以管理和改善糖尿病。
Nutrients. 2021 Apr 2;13(4):1179. doi: 10.3390/nu13041179.
7
"Counting Carbs to Be in Charge": A Comparison of an Internet-Based Education Module With In-Class Education in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes.“计算碳水化合物摄入量以掌控病情”:针对 1 型糖尿病青少年的基于互联网的教育模块与课堂教育的比较
Clin Diabetes. 2021 Jan;39(1):80-87. doi: 10.2337/cd20-0060.
8
Comprehensive Analysis of the Real Lifestyles of T1D Patients for the Purpose of Designing a Personalized Counselor for Prandial Insulin Dosing.全面分析 T1D 患者的真实生活方式,旨在为餐前胰岛素剂量设计个性化咨询师。
Nutrients. 2019 May 23;11(5):1148. doi: 10.3390/nu11051148.