Suppr超能文献

初级保健提供者的遗传教育:改善态度、知识和信心。

Genetic education for primary care providers: improving attitudes, knowledge, and confidence.

机构信息

Family Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, Ont.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 2009 Dec;55(12):e92-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To increase primary care providers' awareness and use of genetic services; increase their knowledge of genetic issues; increase their confidence in core genetic competencies; change their attitudes toward genetic testing for hereditary diseases; and increase their confidence as primary care genetic resources.

DESIGN

Participants completed a workshop and 3 questionnaires: a baseline questionnaire, a survey that provided immediate feedback on the workshop itself, and a follow-up questionnaire 6 months later.

SETTING

Ontario.

PARTICIPANTS

Primary care providers suggested by deans of nursing, midwifery, family medicine, and obstetric programs, as well as coordinators of nurse practitioner programs, in Ontario and by the Ontario College of Family Physicians.

INTERVENTION

A complex educational intervention was developed, including an interactive workshop and PowerPoint educational modules on genetic topics for participants' use (available at www.mtsinai.on.ca/FamMedGen/).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Awareness and use of genetic services, knowledge of genetics, confidence in core clinical genetic skills, attitudes toward genetic testing, and teaching activities related to genetics.

RESULTS

The workshop was attended by 29 participants; of those, 21 completed the baseline questionnaire and the 6-month follow-up questionnaire. There was no significant change found in awareness or reported use of genetic services. There was significant improvement in self-assessed knowledge of (P = .001) and confidence in (P = .005) skills related to adult-onset genetic disorders. There were significant increases in confidence in many core genetic competencies, including assessing risk of hereditary disorders (P = .033), deciding who should be offered referral for genetic counseling (P = .003), discussing prenatal testing options (P = .034), discussing benefits, risks, and limitations of genetic testing (P = .033), and describing what to expect at a genetic counseling session (P = .022). There was a significant increase in the number of primary care providers agreeing that genetic testing was beneficial in the management of adult-onset diseases (P = .031) and in their confidence in being primary care genetic resources for adult-onset genetic disorders (P = .006).

CONCLUSION

Educational interventions that include interactive peer resource workshops and educational modules can increase knowledge of and confidence in the core competencies needed for the delivery of genetic services in primary care.

摘要

目的

提高初级保健提供者对遗传服务的认识和使用;增加他们对遗传问题的了解;增强他们对核心遗传能力的信心;改变他们对遗传性疾病基因检测的态度;并增强他们作为初级保健遗传资源的信心。

设计

参与者完成了一个研讨会和 3 份问卷:基线问卷、一份对研讨会本身提供即时反馈的调查以及 6 个月后的后续问卷。

地点

安大略省。

参与者

由护理、助产、家庭医学和产科项目的院长以及安大略省执业护士项目的协调员以及安大略省家庭医生学院推荐的初级保健提供者。

干预措施

开发了一种复杂的教育干预措施,包括一个互动研讨会和针对参与者使用的遗传主题的 PowerPoint 教育模块(可在 www.mtsinai.on.ca/FamMedGen/ 获得)。

主要结果测量指标

对遗传服务的认识和使用、遗传学知识、对核心临床遗传技能的信心、对基因检测的态度以及与遗传学相关的教学活动。

结果

有 29 名参与者参加了研讨会;其中,21 名完成了基线问卷和 6 个月后的后续问卷。在遗传服务的认识或报告使用方面没有发现显著变化。自我评估的成人发病遗传障碍相关知识(P =.001)和技能信心(P =.005)有显著提高。许多核心遗传能力的信心都有显著提高,包括评估遗传性疾病风险(P =.033)、决定谁应该获得遗传咨询转介(P =.003)、讨论产前检测选择(P =.034)、讨论基因检测的益处、风险和局限性(P =.033)以及描述在遗传咨询会议中可以期待什么(P =.022)。越来越多的初级保健提供者同意基因检测在成人发病疾病管理中的益处(P =.031),并且对自己作为成人发病遗传疾病的初级保健遗传资源的信心也有所提高(P =.006)。

结论

包括互动同行资源研讨会和教育模块的教育干预措施可以提高初级保健中提供遗传服务所需的核心能力的知识和信心。

相似文献

2
Effect of comprehensive oncogenetics training interventions for general practitioners, evaluated at multiple performance levels.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0122648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122648. eCollection 2015.
3
GenetiKit: a randomized controlled trial to enhance delivery of genetics services by family physicians.
Fam Pract. 2011 Dec;28(6):615-23. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr040. Epub 2011 Jul 10.
4
Cancer genetics education in a low- to middle-income country: evaluation of an interactive workshop for clinicians in Kenya.
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 2;10(6):e0129852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129852. eCollection 2015.
5
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
7
Effect of training on physician attitudes and practices in home and community care of the elderly.
Arch Fam Med. 1997 Sep-Oct;6(5):439-44. doi: 10.1001/archfami.6.5.439.
8
Physicians' knowledge of genetics and genetic tests.
Acad Med. 1993 Aug;68(8):625-32. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199308000-00013.
9
Increasing confidence and changing behaviors in primary care providers engaged in genetic counselling.
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 13;17(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0982-4.

引用本文的文献

2
Ensuring best practice in genomics education: A scoping review of genomics education needs assessments and evaluations.
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Aug 8;111(8):1508-1523. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.06.005. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
3
Ensuring best practice in genomics education: A theory- and empirically informed evaluation framework.
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Aug 8;111(8):1497-1507. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.06.004. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
4
Strengthening First Responders' Coaching Proficiency through a Peer Fitness Leader Workshop: A Preliminary Efficacy Trial.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Feb 1;17(3):298-307. doi: 10.70252/UMFP3584. eCollection 2024.
5
Training of community health agents - a strategy for earlier recognition of mucopolysaccharidoses.
J Community Genet. 2024 Apr;15(2):129-135. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00691-7. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
6
Attitudes of Australian dermatologists on the use of genetic testing: A cross-sectional survey with a focus on melanoma.
Front Genet. 2022 Oct 24;13:919134. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.919134. eCollection 2022.
7
[Not Available].
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2022 Apr 1;32(2):258-271. doi: 10.5737/23688076322258271. eCollection 2022 Spring.
8
Issues associated with a hereditary risk of cancer: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of nurses in oncology settings.
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2022 Apr 1;32(2):272-285. doi: 10.5737/23688076322272285. eCollection 2022 Spring.
9
Evaluation of a Genetics Education Program for Health Interpreters: A Pilot Study.
Front Genet. 2022 Feb 3;12:771892. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.771892. eCollection 2021.
10
A Survey of the Awareness and Educational Needs of Nurses in Nagasaki Prefecture Regarding Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Apr;38(2):406-411. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02132-4. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

2
Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD000125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000125.pub3.
4
GPs' opinions of their role in prenatal genetic services: a cross-sectional survey.
Fam Pract. 2006 Feb;23(1):106-10. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi088. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
6
Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians.
J Med Genet. 2005 Oct;42(10):749-55. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.030296. Epub 2005 Mar 22.
8
Outcomes from intensive training in genetic cancer risk counseling for clinicians.
Genet Med. 2005 Jan;7(1):40-7. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000151154.27612.49.
9
Effects of a cancer genetics education programme on clinician knowledge and practice.
J Med Genet. 2004 Jul;41(7):518-22. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.018234.
10
Integrating genetics as practices of primary care.
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jul;59(2):223-33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.025.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验