Schroy Paul C, Glick Julie T, Geller Alan C, Jackson Angela, Heeren Timothy, Prout Marianne
Department of Medicine and Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Mar;100(3):677-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41336.x.
Internal medicine residents are deficient in their knowledge about familial colorectal cancer (CRC) and thus unable to comply with appropriate screening guidelines. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mixed educational program that incorporates both a didactic lecture (DL) and interactive, case-based seminar (ICBS), plus distribution of a personal digital assistant (PDA)-based risk assessment tool.
Internal medicine resident continuity care teams were randomly assigned to an intervention (9 teams; 43 residents) or control (11 teams; 39 residents) arm. Both groups participated in a DL addressing the current status of CRC screening for average, moderate, and high-risk groups. Intervention teams also participated in a 1-h pre-clinic ICBS that included vignettes about patients at moderate or high risk of CRC because of family history, following which they received the risk assessment tool by e-mail. Knowledge and clinical risk assessment skills were evaluated using pre/posttests, patient exit interviews, and chart audits.
Baseline test scores were similar for both groups (intervention, 51%vs control, 54%; p= 0.35). Immediate post-ICBS scores (intervention group only) significantly increased to 82% (p < 0.001). Six-month post-ICBS scores declined for the intervention group but remained significantly higher than 6-month control group scores (63%vs 56%, p= 0.002), which were unchanged from baseline. No significant differences were observed with respect to family history-taking or documentation skills.
A mixed educational program that incorporates both a DL and ICBS is more effective that the DL alone for increasing knowledge about familial CRC risk but may have limited influence on clinical risk assessment skills.
内科住院医师对家族性结直肠癌(CRC)的知识存在欠缺,因此无法遵循适当的筛查指南。本研究的目的是评估一种混合教育项目的有效性,该项目包括一场理论讲座(DL)和互动式、基于病例的研讨会(ICBS),以及发放基于个人数字助理(PDA)的风险评估工具。
将内科住院医师连续性医疗团队随机分为干预组(9个团队;43名住院医师)或对照组(11个团队;39名住院医师)。两组都参加了一场关于平均风险、中度风险和高风险组CRC筛查现状的理论讲座。干预组还参加了一场为期1小时的门诊前ICBS,其中包括因家族史而处于CRC中度或高风险的患者案例,之后他们通过电子邮件收到风险评估工具。使用课前/课后测试、患者出院访谈和病历审核来评估知识和临床风险评估技能。
两组的基线测试分数相似(干预组为51%,对照组为54%;p = 0.35)。ICBS结束后的即时分数(仅干预组)显著提高到82%(p < 0.001)。干预组ICBS结束后6个月的分数有所下降,但仍显著高于对照组6个月的分数(63%对56%,p = 0.