Suppr超能文献

持续深度镇静直至死亡:是姑息治疗还是医生协助死亡?

Continuous deep sedation until death: palliation or physician-assisted death?

作者信息

Rady Mohamed Y, Verheijde Joseph L

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010 May;27(3):205-14. doi: 10.1177/1049909109348868. Epub 2009 Dec 14.

Abstract

Published literature has not discerned end-of-life palliative versus life-shortening effects of pharmacologically maintaining continuous deep sedation until death (i.e., dying in deep sleep) compared with common sedation practices relieving distress in the final conscious phase of dying. Continuous deep sedation predictably suppresses brainstem vital centers and shortens life. Continuous deep sedation remains controversial as palliation for existential suffering and in elective death requests by discontinuation of chronic ventilation or circulatory support with mechanical devices. Continuous deep sedation contravenes the double-effect principle because: (1) it induces permanent coma (intent of action) for the contingency relief of suffering and for social isolation (desired outcomes) and (2) because of its predictable and proportional life-shortening effect. Continuous deep sedation should be distinguished from common sedation practices for palliation and characterized instead as physician-assisted death.

摘要

与在濒死的最后意识阶段缓解痛苦的普通镇静方法相比,已发表的文献尚未区分通过药物维持持续深度镇静直至死亡(即在深度睡眠中死亡)的临终姑息治疗与缩短生命的效果。持续深度镇静可预见地会抑制脑干生命中枢并缩短生命。持续深度镇静作为缓解生存痛苦的姑息治疗方法,以及在通过停用慢性通气或使用机械设备进行循环支持的选择性死亡请求中,仍然存在争议。持续深度镇静违反了双重效应原则,因为:(1)它为缓解痛苦和社交隔离(预期结果)而诱导永久性昏迷(行动意图),以及(2)因其具有可预见且成比例的缩短生命的效果。持续深度镇静应与用于姑息治疗的普通镇静方法区分开来,而应被定性为医生协助自杀。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验