• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参保糖尿病患者持续性护理服务缺口的特征:转化研究行动糖尿病(TRIAD)研究。

Characteristics of insured patients with persistent gaps in diabetes care services: the Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study.

机构信息

Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2010 Jan;48(1):31-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181bd4783.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181bd4783
PMID:20009778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4269465/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although preventing diabetes complications requires long-term management, little is known about which patients persistently fail to get recommended care.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency and correlates of persistent, long-term gaps in diabetes care.

METHOD

: The study population included 8392 patients with diabetes. Patient surveys and medical records from 10 health plans over 3 years provided data on socioeconomic characteristics, access to care, social support, and mental and physical health, and diabetes preventive care services. We defined a "persistent gap" as a participant's missing a preventive care service for the entire 3 years. Services considered included hemoglobin A1c, cholesterol, and albuminuria tests, and foot and dilated eye examinations.

RESULTS

Thirty percent of participants had at least 1 persistent gap. The most common gaps were lipid testing (11.6%), microalbuminuria testing (9.7%), and eye examinations (9.0%). Persistent gaps were 18% to 42% higher for young patients, lean persons, those with low income, employed persons, smokers, those with diabetes less than 5 years, and patients with none or 1 comorbid conditions. Sex, education, marital status, family demands, transportation, trust in physicians, and mental health were not associated with gaps in care.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent gaps in diabetes care are common even among insured patients. Patients with lower income, younger age, fewer years of diabetes, having fewer comorbidities, taking fewer medications, and poor health behaviors are vulnerable to persistent gaps in care and a group who warrant targeted interventions to improve preventive diabetes care.

摘要

背景

尽管预防糖尿病并发症需要长期管理,但对于哪些患者持续无法获得推荐的护理,人们知之甚少。

目的

确定糖尿病护理中长期持续存在差距的频率和相关因素。

方法

研究人群包括 8392 名糖尿病患者。来自 10 个健康计划的患者调查和医疗记录在 3 年内提供了社会经济特征、获得护理的机会、社会支持以及心理和身体健康以及糖尿病预防保健服务的数据。我们将“持续差距”定义为参与者在整个 3 年内错过预防保健服务。考虑的服务包括血红蛋白 A1c、胆固醇和白蛋白尿测试以及足部和散瞳检查。

结果

30%的参与者至少有 1 个持续存在的差距。最常见的差距是血脂检测(11.6%)、微量白蛋白尿检测(9.7%)和眼部检查(9.0%)。年轻患者、消瘦者、低收入者、就业者、吸烟者、糖尿病病史不足 5 年者和无合并症或仅有 1 种合并症者的持续差距高出 18%至 42%。性别、教育程度、婚姻状况、家庭需求、交通、对医生的信任和心理健康与护理差距无关。

结论

即使在有保险的患者中,糖尿病护理的持续差距也很常见。收入较低、年龄较小、糖尿病病史较短、合并症较少、服用药物较少且健康行为较差的患者容易出现持续的护理差距,这是一组需要针对性干预以改善预防糖尿病护理的人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd21/4269465/77d1257091fc/nihms648442f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd21/4269465/b10c0329a40c/nihms648442f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd21/4269465/77d1257091fc/nihms648442f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd21/4269465/b10c0329a40c/nihms648442f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd21/4269465/77d1257091fc/nihms648442f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Characteristics of insured patients with persistent gaps in diabetes care services: the Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study.参保糖尿病患者持续性护理服务缺口的特征:转化研究行动糖尿病(TRIAD)研究。
Med Care. 2010 Jan;48(1):31-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181bd4783.
2
The association between health insurance coverage and diabetes care; data from the 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.医疗保险覆盖范围与糖尿病护理之间的关联;来自2000年行为危险因素监测系统的数据。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):361-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00361.x.
3
Understanding the gap between good processes of diabetes care and poor intermediate outcomes: Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD).理解糖尿病优质护理流程与不良中期结果之间的差距:糖尿病研究成果转化为行动(TRIAD)。
Med Care. 2007 Dec;45(12):1144-53. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181468e79.
4
Health insurance status, cost-related medication underuse, and outcomes among diabetes patients in three systems of care.三种医疗体系中糖尿病患者的健康保险状况、与费用相关的药物治疗未充分使用情况及治疗结果
Med Care. 2004 Feb;42(2):102-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000108742.26446.17.
5
Impact of state mandatory insurance coverage on the use of diabetes preventive care.国家强制保险覆盖范围对糖尿病预防保健利用的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 May 21;10:133. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-133.
6
Surveillance for Health Care Access and Health Services Use, Adults Aged 18-64 Years - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2014.18-64岁成年人医疗保健可及性与医疗服务利用情况监测——美国行为危险因素监测系统,2014年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Feb 24;66(7):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6607a1.
7
Persistent high utilization in a privately insured population.私人保险人群中持续的高利用率。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Apr;21(4):309-16.
8
Quality of diabetes care and health insurance coverage: a retrospective study in an outpatient academic public hospital in Switzerland.糖尿病护理质量与健康保险覆盖情况:瑞士一家门诊学术公立医院的回顾性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 3;16(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1801-z.
9
Social Determinants of Health and Insurance Claim Denials for Preventive Care.健康的社会决定因素与预防性保健保险理赔拒绝。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2433316. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33316.
10
Enhancing pharmacist intervention targeting based on patient clustering with unsupervised machine learning.基于无监督机器学习的患者聚类增强药剂师干预靶向性。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Feb;25(2):187-195. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2406810. Epub 2024 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of cardiovascular disease among Asian, Pacific Islander and multi-race populations in Hawai'i and California.夏威夷和加利福尼亚州亚裔、太平洋岛民和多种族人群中心血管疾病的患病率。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 15;23(1):885. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15795-5.
2
Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Assessment and Screening for Diabetes-Related Complications in Individuals With Diabetes: A Systematic Review.性别差异在心血管风险因素评估和糖尿病相关并发症筛查中的作用:系统评价。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 30;12:617902. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.617902. eCollection 2021.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis of patient race/ethnicity, socioeconomics, and quality for adult type 2 diabetes.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the gap between good processes of diabetes care and poor intermediate outcomes: Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD).理解糖尿病优质护理流程与不良中期结果之间的差距:糖尿病研究成果转化为行动(TRIAD)。
Med Care. 2007 Dec;45(12):1144-53. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181468e79.
2
Race/ethnicity and economic differences in cost-related medication underuse among insured adults with diabetes: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes Study.糖尿病参保成年人中与费用相关的药物使用不足方面的种族/族裔和经济差异:糖尿病研究转化为行动项目
Diabetes Care. 2008 Feb;31(2):261-6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1341. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
3
患者种族/民族、社会经济学和成人 2 型糖尿病质量的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;55(5):741-772. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13326. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
4
Young onset type 2 diabetic patients might be more sensitive to metformin compared to late onset type 2 diabetic patients.年轻起病的 2 型糖尿病患者可能比晚起病的 2 型糖尿病患者对二甲双胍更敏感。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 27;7(1):16382. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16658-x.
5
Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with diabetes: protocol for a nested case-control study.糖尿病患者季节性流感疫苗接种的有效性:一项巢式病例对照研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 18;7(8):e016023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016023.
6
Gaps in receipt of regular eye examinations among medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with diabetes or chronic eye diseases.被诊断患有糖尿病或慢性眼疾的医疗保险受益人群在接受定期眼部检查方面存在差距。
Ophthalmology. 2014 Dec;121(12):2452-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Sep 7.
7
Adherence to laboratory test requests by patients with diabetes: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE).糖尿病患者对实验室检查要求的依从性:北加州糖尿病研究(DISTANCE)。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 May;17(5):339-44.
8
Effect of patient selection method on provider group performance estimates.患者选择方法对提供者组绩效评估的影响。
Med Care. 2011 Aug;49(8):780-5. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821b3604.
9
Helping high-risk youth move through high-risk periods: personally controlled health records for improving social and health care transitions.帮助高危青少年度过高危时期:利用个人可控健康记录改善社会和医疗保健过渡。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 1;5(1):47-54. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500107.
10
Associations between health care factors and self-reported health status among individuals with diabetes: results from a community assessment.医疗保健因素与糖尿病患者自我报告健康状况之间的关联:社区评估结果。
J Community Health. 2011 Apr;36(2):332-41. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9314-x.
Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002.
糖尿病护理流程及中间结果的改善:美国,1988 - 2002年
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 4;144(7):465-74. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00005.
4
Socioeconomic position and health among persons with diabetes mellitus: a conceptual framework and review of the literature.糖尿病患者的社会经济地位与健康:一个概念框架及文献综述
Epidemiol Rev. 2004;26:63-77. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxh002.
5
Application of economic analysis to diabetes and diabetes care.经济分析在糖尿病及糖尿病护理中的应用。
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jun 1;140(11):972-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-11-200406010-00039.
6
The evolving diabetes burden in the United States.美国不断变化的糖尿病负担。
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jun 1;140(11):945-50. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-11-200406010-00035.
7
Sustained effect of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus on development and progression of diabetic nephropathy: the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study.1型糖尿病强化治疗对糖尿病肾病发生及进展的持续影响:糖尿病干预与并发症流行病学(EDIC)研究
JAMA. 2003 Oct 22;290(16):2159-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.16.2159.
8
Cost-effectiveness of glycemic control and ophthalmological care in diabetic retinopathy.糖尿病视网膜病变中血糖控制与眼科护理的成本效益
Health Policy. 2003 Apr;64(1):89-97. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00143-4.
9
Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities.我们应该对谁进行剖析?审视初级保健提供者、提供者群体和医疗保健机构之间糖尿病护理实践的差异。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1159-80. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.01102.
10
Preventive-care practices among persons with diabetes--United States, 1995 and 2001.1995年和2001年美国糖尿病患者的预防保健措施
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002 Nov 1;51(43):965-9.