Suppr超能文献

子宫内膜癌的腹腔镜手术:一项多中心研究的长期结果

Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a multicentric study.

作者信息

Holub Z, Jabor A, Bartos P, Eim J, Urbánek S, Pivovarniková R

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baby Friendly Hospital, Kladno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2002;23(4):305-10.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION

Surgical treatment of endometrial cancer was traditionally done by laparotomy, however the laparoscopic approach has gained wider acceptance by gynecologic surgeons. The primary aim of the study was to report the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in a major group of patients with endometrial cancer. The second aim was to study the long-term results of laparoscopic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A prospective multicentric study was conducted at three oncolaparoscopic centres; 221 women who had undergone laparoscopic (177 women) or abdominal (44 women) hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and lymphadenectomy were included in the study. Women with stage IA, grade I did not undergo lymphadenectomy unless they had a high risk histologic tumor type. Lymph node dissection was performed in 145 women with disease greater than IA or grades other than 1.

RESULTS

The mean age and weight were similar in the compared laparoscopic and open groups. Perioperative blood loss was comparable in both groups (211.2 ml vs 245.7 ml, respectively) without any significant consecutive changes in serum hemoglobin values. Although the length of operating time for the laparoscopic surgery was significantly longer than the time for the laparotomy procedure (163.3 min vs 114.7 min, p < 0.0001), the laparoscopic patients were discharged from hospital much earlier at 3.9 days (range 2-16) after the laparoscopic procedure compared with 7.3 days (range 5-16) after the abdominal procedure (p < 0.0001). The difference in surgical complications between groups was statistically insignificant (p = 0.58). Similar long-term results were noted in both groups. With a median follow-up of 33.6 months for the laparoscopy group and 45.2 months for the open group, there were no significant differences in tumor recurrence (p = 0.99] or recurrence-free survival (p = 0.86) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The study illustrates that laparoscopically assisted surgical staging of endometrial cancer is safe as an open procedure. The laparoscopic approach may also be considered for endometrial malignancy which typically occurs in obese and elderly, high-risk women. Our analysis showed no difference with respect to recurrence or survival between the compared laparoscopic and the open group.

摘要

研究目的

传统上子宫内膜癌的手术治疗是通过剖腹手术进行的,然而腹腔镜手术方法已获得妇科外科医生更广泛的认可。本研究的主要目的是报告一大组子宫内膜癌患者腹腔镜手术的围手术期和术后结果。第二个目的是研究子宫内膜癌患者腹腔镜手术的长期结果。

材料与方法

在三个肿瘤腹腔镜中心进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究;221名接受了腹腔镜(177名女性)或腹部(44名女性)子宫切除术、双侧输卵管卵巢切除术和淋巴结清扫术的女性被纳入研究。IA期、1级的女性除非有高风险组织学肿瘤类型,否则不进行淋巴结清扫术。145名疾病分期大于IA期或分级不是1级的女性进行了淋巴结清扫。

结果

比较的腹腔镜组和开放手术组的平均年龄和体重相似。两组围手术期失血量相当(分别为211.2毫升和245.7毫升),血清血红蛋白值没有任何显著的连续变化。虽然腹腔镜手术的手术时间明显长于剖腹手术时间(163.3分钟对114.7分钟,p<0.0001),但腹腔镜手术患者在腹腔镜手术后3.9天(范围2 - 16天)出院,比腹部手术后7.3天(范围5 - 16天)早得多(p<0.0001)。两组手术并发症的差异无统计学意义(p = 0.58)。两组的长期结果相似。腹腔镜组的中位随访时间为33.6个月,开放手术组为45.2个月,两组之间在肿瘤复发(p = 0.99)或无复发生存率(p = 0.86)方面没有显著差异。

结论

该研究表明,腹腔镜辅助的子宫内膜癌手术分期与开放手术一样安全。对于通常发生在肥胖和老年高危女性中的子宫内膜恶性肿瘤,也可考虑采用腹腔镜手术方法。我们的分析表明,比较的腹腔镜组和开放手术组在复发或生存方面没有差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验