• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

六项欧洲国家的间期癌发生率的汇总分析。

A pooled analysis of interval cancer rates in six European countries.

机构信息

Oncologic Centre, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010 Mar;19(2):87-93. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32833548ed.

DOI:10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32833548ed
PMID:20010429
Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess detection rates and interval breast cancer (IC) rates from eight programmes in the European Breast Cancer Screening Network. A common data collection protocol was used to explore differences in IC rates among programmes and discuss their potential determinants. Pooled analysis was used to describe IC rates by age, compliance in screening, recall rate, screening detection (SD) rate and expected breast cancer incidence. Participation in screening averaged 77.9% (range 42.6-88.7%), recall rate 5.4% (range 3.3-17.7%) in the initial and 3.4% (range 1.8-8.9%) in the subsequent screening rounds, and SD rate was 60.4 (range 41.6-91) per 10 000 women in initial and 38.5 (range 31.3-62.6) in subsequent screens. IC rate during first 12 months after screening was 5.9 (range 2.1-7.3) per 10 000 women screened negative and 12.6 (range 6.3-15) in the second year of the interval. IC comprised 28% of the IC and SD cancers. The ratio between IC rate and expected incidence was 0.29 for the first 12 months and 0.63 for the 13-24 months period. Sensitivity was higher for the ages 60-69 years and for initial tests than subsequent tests. There were distinct differences in the IC rates between programmes. The results of this study reveal large variations in screening sensitivity and performance. Pooled evaluation of some process indicators within the European breast cancer screening programmes proved to be feasible and is likely to be useful for the future, particularly if it is performed regularly and extensively.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估欧洲乳腺癌筛查网络中 8 个项目的检出率和间期乳腺癌(IC)率。使用通用的数据收集方案来探讨项目之间 IC 率的差异,并讨论其潜在的决定因素。采用汇总分析描述了按年龄、筛查依从性、召回率、筛查检出率(SD)和预期乳腺癌发病率划分的 IC 率。筛查的平均参与率为 77.9%(范围为 42.6-88.7%),初筛的召回率为 5.4%(范围为 3.3-17.7%),随后筛查的召回率为 3.4%(范围为 1.8-8.9%),SD 率为每 10000 名女性初筛 60.4(范围为 41.6-91),随后筛查 38.5(范围为 31.3-62.6)。在筛查后的 12 个月内,IC 率为每 10000 名阴性筛查女性 5.9(范围为 2.1-7.3),第二年为 12.6(范围为 6.3-15)。IC 占 IC 和 SD 癌的 28%。前 12 个月的 IC 率与预期发病率的比值为 0.29,第 13-24 个月的比值为 0.63。60-69 岁年龄组和初筛的敏感性高于后续筛查。项目之间的 IC 率存在明显差异。本研究结果表明,筛查的敏感性和效能存在很大差异。对欧洲乳腺癌筛查项目的一些过程指标进行汇总评估是可行的,并且可能对未来有用,特别是如果定期广泛进行。

相似文献

1
A pooled analysis of interval cancer rates in six European countries.六项欧洲国家的间期癌发生率的汇总分析。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010 Mar;19(2):87-93. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32833548ed.
2
Ascertainment and evaluation of interval cancers in population-based mammography screening programmes: a collaborative study in four European centres.基于人群的乳腺钼靶筛查项目中间隔期癌症的确定与评估:欧洲四个中心的合作研究
J Med Screen. 2005;12(1):43-9. doi: 10.1258/0969141053279077.
3
Interval cancer rates in the Irish national breast screening programme.爱尔兰国家乳腺癌筛查项目中的间期癌发病率
J Med Screen. 2015 Sep;22(3):136-43. doi: 10.1177/0969141315580386. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
4
Episode sensitivity in association with process indicators in the Finnish breast cancer screening program.芬兰乳腺癌筛查项目中与过程指标相关的发病敏感度
Int J Cancer. 2006 Jan 1;118(1):174-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21310.
5
Time trends of process and impact indicators in Italian breast screening programmes--1996-2005.1996 - 2005年意大利乳腺癌筛查项目中过程指标和影响指标的时间趋势
Epidemiol Prev. 2008 Mar-Apr;32(2 Suppl 1):23-36.
6
Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.菲英岛县的乳腺钼靶筛查。1993年11月 - 1999年12月。
APMIS Suppl. 2003(110):1-33.
7
Performance indicators evaluation of the population-based breast cancer screening programme in Northern Portugal using the European Guidelines.使用欧洲指南对葡萄牙北部基于人群的乳腺癌筛查计划进行绩效指标评估。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;39(5):783-9. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
8
Age-specific interval breast cancers in New South Wales and meta-analysis of studies of women aged 40-49 years.新南威尔士州特定年龄间隔期乳腺癌及40 - 49岁女性研究的荟萃分析。
J Med Screen. 2004;11(4):199-206. doi: 10.1258/0969141042467403.
9
Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.1991年4月至1997年3月哥本哈根乳腺癌的乳腺X线筛查。乳腺X线筛查评估小组。
APMIS Suppl. 1998;83:1-44.
10
Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.基于荷兰性能指标的召回率对早期乳腺癌筛查检测的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 May 18;97(10):748-54. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji131.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study.乳腺钼靶影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分布分析及超声随访评估:一项单中心研究
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2025 Feb 6;17:115-122. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S481201. eCollection 2025.
2
AI-based selection of individuals for supplemental MRI in population-based breast cancer screening: the randomized ScreenTrustMRI trial.基于人工智能的个体选择用于基于人群的乳腺癌筛查中的补充 MRI:随机的 ScreenTrustMRI 试验。
Nat Med. 2024 Sep;30(9):2623-2630. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03093-5. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
3
Women's perceptions and attitudes towards the use of AI in mammography in Sweden: a qualitative interview study.
瑞典女性对乳腺 X 光摄影中使用人工智能的看法和态度:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 14;14(2):e084014. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084014.
4
Interval breast cancer rates for digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography population screening: An meta-analysis.数字化乳腺断层合成与数字化乳腺钼靶人群筛查的间期乳腺癌发病率:一项荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Mar 20;34:100804. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100804. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
Bahcesehir long-term population-based screening compared to National Breast Cancer Registry Data: effectiveness of screening in an emerging country.巴希切希尔基于人群的长期筛查与国家乳腺癌登记数据的比较:新兴国家筛查的效果。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021 Mar;27(2):157-163. doi: 10.5152/dir.2021.20486.
6
External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms.商业人工智能算法独立评估筛查性乳房 X 光照片的外部评估。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Oct 1;6(10):1581-1588. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3321.
7
Importance of quality in breast cancer screening practice - a natural experiment in Alberta, Canada.乳腺癌筛查实践中质量的重要性——加拿大艾伯塔省的自然实验。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 6;10(1):e028766. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028766.
8
Towards 4D dedicated breast CT perfusion imaging of cancer: development and validation of computer simulated images.面向癌症的 4D 专用乳腺 CT 灌注成像:计算机模拟图像的开发和验证。
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Dec 13;64(24):245004. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab55ac.
9
A Multi-million Mammography Image Dataset and Population-Based Screening Cohort for the Training and Evaluation of Deep Neural Networks-the Cohort of Screen-Aged Women (CSAW).一个包含数百万张乳腺 X 光图像的数据集和一个基于人群的筛查队列,用于深度学习神经网络的培训和评估 - 筛查年龄段女性队列(CSAW)。
J Digit Imaging. 2020 Apr;33(2):408-413. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00278-0.
10
Breast Cancer Screening Program in Lithuania: Interval Cancers and Program Sensitivity After 7 Years of Mammography Screening.立陶宛乳腺癌筛查计划:7 年乳腺 X 线筛查后的间期癌和计划灵敏度。
Cancer Control. 2019 Jan-Dec;26(1):1073274819874122. doi: 10.1177/1073274819874122.