Suppr超能文献

乳腺钼靶影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分布分析及超声随访评估:一项单中心研究

Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study.

作者信息

Kankaya Burak, Buyukasik Suleyman, Altundal Yusuf Emre, Topcu Feyza Sonmez, Rahmanbakhsh Paria, Etemad Ayden, Kapan Selin, Alis Halil

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2025 Feb 6;17:115-122. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S481201. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Our study has three main aims: 1) to assess the distribution of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classifications in a cohort of Turkish women undergoing screening mammography, 2) to analyze the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up ultrasound (US) examinations, and 3) to examine the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Our goal was to evaluate potential gaps in the current breast cancer screening process by analyzing BI-RADS classifications, follow-up completion rates, and outcomes of completed ultrasound examinations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 1761 Turkish women who underwent screening mammography from 2020-2022 at the Istanbul Aydin University General Surgery Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. We assessed the distribution of BI-RADS classifications, analyzed the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up US, and examined the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Chi-square tests of independence and Spearman's rank correlation test were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Our study revealed three key findings: 1) Over half of mammograms (55.9%) were classified as BI-RADS 0, requiring further imaging. 2) Nearly one-third of patients who recommended US examinations (31.91%) did not complete recommended follow-up ultrasound appointments. 3) Among those who completed follow-up ultrasonography, almost one-third (29.7%) were reclassified as BI-RADS 3 or higher. Notably, 2.3% (n=18) were classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5, suggesting findings suspicious for malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the crucial role of follow-up US in breast cancer screening. The high rate of initial BI-RADS 0 classifications using mammography, coupled with the significant non-completion rate for follow-up US examinations, particularly among older age groups, highlights potential gaps in the current screening process.

摘要

目的

我们的研究有三个主要目标:1)评估接受乳腺钼靶筛查的土耳其女性队列中乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分类的分布情况;2)分析推荐的后续超声(US)检查的频率和未完成率;3)检查已完成的后续超声检查的结果。我们的目标是通过分析BI-RADS分类、后续检查完成率和已完成超声检查的结果,评估当前乳腺癌筛查过程中的潜在差距。

患者与方法

这项回顾性研究分析了2020年至2022年在土耳其伊斯坦布尔艾登大学普通外科诊所接受乳腺钼靶筛查的1761名土耳其女性。我们评估了BI-RADS分类的分布情况,分析了推荐的后续超声检查的频率和未完成率,并检查了已完成的后续超声检查的结果。使用独立性卡方检验和斯皮尔曼等级相关检验来分析数据。

结果

我们的研究揭示了三个关键发现:1)超过一半的乳腺钼靶检查(55.9%)被分类为BI-RADS 0,需要进一步成像。2)近三分之一推荐进行超声检查的患者(占31.91%)未完成推荐的后续超声检查预约。3)在完成后续超声检查的患者中,近三分之一(29.7%)被重新分类为BI-RADS 3或更高。值得注意的是,2.3%(n = 18)被分类为BI-RADS 4或5,提示有恶性可疑表现。

结论

我们的研究结果凸显了后续超声检查在乳腺癌筛查中的关键作用。乳腺钼靶检查初始BI-RADS 0分类的高比例,加上后续超声检查的显著未完成率,尤其是在老年人群中,凸显了当前筛查过程中的潜在差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d7/11809216/7c6d847d07c0/BCTT-17-115-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study.
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2025 Feb 6;17:115-122. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S481201. eCollection 2025.
2
Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features.
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1087):20170787. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170787. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
4
Focal Breast Lesions in Clinical CT Examinations of the Chest: A Retrospective Analysis.
Rofo. 2017 Oct;189(10):977-989. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-112749. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
5
Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Mar;206(3):666-72. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14785.
8
BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.
Acad Radiol. 2019 Aug;26(8):1048-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
9
BI-RADS 3 on dense breast screening ultrasound after digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis.
Clin Imaging. 2021 Dec;80:315-321. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.07.030. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
10
Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Radiology. 2012 Oct;265(1):59-69. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120621. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

2
Performance analysis of screening mammography in Asian women under 40 years.
Breast Cancer. 2023 Mar;30(2):241-248. doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01414-5. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
4
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mammography in the Detection of Breast Cancer.
Cureus. 2018 Apr 8;10(4):e2448. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2448.
6
Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound in a population-based screening program.
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr;101:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.022. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening in Turkey, a Developing Country: Results from Bahçeşehir Mammography Screening Project.
Eur J Breast Health. 2017 Jul 1;13(3):117-122. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2017.3528. eCollection 2017 Jul.
8
Benefits and harms of mammography screening.
Breast Cancer Res. 2015 May 1;17(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0525-z.
10
Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects.
Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):223. doi: 10.1186/bcr2942. Epub 2011 Nov 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验