Suppr超能文献

植物中稳健免疫的网络特性。

Network properties of robust immunity in plants.

机构信息

Department of Plant Biology, Microbial and Plant Genomics Institute, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

PLoS Genet. 2009 Dec;5(12):e1000772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000772. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

Abstract

Two modes of plant immunity against biotrophic pathogens, Effector Triggered Immunity (ETI) and Pattern-Triggered Immunity (PTI), are triggered by recognition of pathogen effectors and Microbe-Associated Molecular Patterns (MAMPs), respectively. Although the jasmonic acid (JA)/ethylene (ET) and salicylic acid (SA) signaling sectors are generally antagonistic and important for immunity against necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens, respectively, their precise roles and interactions in ETI and PTI have not been clear. We constructed an Arabidopsis dde2/ein2/pad4/sid2-quadruple mutant. DDE2, EIN2, and SID2 are essential components of the JA, ET, and SA sectors, respectively. The pad4 mutation affects the SA sector and a poorly characterized sector. Although the ETI triggered by the bacterial effector AvrRpt2 (AvrRpt2-ETI) and the PTI triggered by the bacterial MAMP flg22 (flg22-PTI) were largely intact in plants with mutations in any one of these genes, they were mostly abolished in the quadruple mutant. For the purposes of this study, AvrRpt2-ETI and flg22-PTI were measured as relative growth of Pseudomonas syringae bacteria within leaves. Immunity to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Alternaria brassicicola was also severely compromised in the quadruple mutant. Quantitative measurements of the immunity levels in all combinatorial mutants and wild type allowed us to estimate the effects of the wild-type genes and their interactions on the immunity by fitting a mixed general linear model. This signaling allocation analysis showed that, contrary to current ideas, each of the JA, ET, and SA signaling sectors can positively contribute to immunity against both biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. The analysis also revealed that while flg22-PTI and AvrRpt2-ETI use a highly overlapping signaling network, the way they use the common network is very different: synergistic relationships among the signaling sectors are evident in PTI, which may amplify the signal; compensatory relationships among the sectors dominate in ETI, explaining the robustness of ETI against genetic and pathogenic perturbations.

摘要

植物有两种免疫模式来抵御生物寄生性病原体,分别是效应子触发的免疫(ETI)和模式触发的免疫(PTI),它们分别由病原体效应子和微生物相关分子模式(MAMPs)的识别所触发。虽然茉莉酸(JA)/乙烯(ET)和水杨酸(SA)信号通路通常是拮抗的,并且分别对坏死性和生物寄生性病原体的免疫至关重要,但它们在 ETI 和 PTI 中的精确作用和相互作用尚不清楚。我们构建了一个拟南芥 dde2/ein2/pad4/sid2 四重突变体。DDE2、EIN2 和 SID2 分别是 JA、ET 和 SA 信号通路的必需组成部分。pad4 突变影响 SA 信号通路和一个特征不明显的信号通路。虽然细菌效应子 AvrRpt2 触发的 ETI(AvrRpt2-ETI)和细菌 MAMP flg22 触发的 PTI(flg22-PTI)在这些基因中任何一个发生突变的植物中基本完整,但在四重突变体中则大部分被消除。在这项研究中,AvrRpt2-ETI 和 flg22-PTI 通过测量叶内丁香假单胞菌的相对生长来衡量。四重突变体中也严重削弱了对坏死性真菌病原体芸苔链格孢菌的免疫。对所有组合突变体和野生型的免疫水平的定量测量使我们能够通过拟合混合广义线性模型来估计野生型基因及其相互作用对免疫的影响。这种信号分配分析表明,与当前的观点相反,JA、ET 和 SA 信号通路中的每一条都可以积极地有助于抵御生物寄生性和坏死性病原体。该分析还表明,尽管 flg22-PTI 和 AvrRpt2-ETI 使用高度重叠的信号网络,但它们使用共同网络的方式却非常不同:PTI 中信号通路之间存在协同关系,这可能会放大信号;而在 ETI 中,信号通路之间存在补偿关系,这解释了 ETI 对遗传和病原扰动的稳健性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a0a/2782137/f5c3ebb74cc3/pgen.1000772.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验