• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

X世代、Y世代、Z世代的求职者在性格特征上有差异吗?来自航空业选拔程序的数据(1987 - 2019年)。

Do applicants from Generation X, Y, Z differ in personality traits? data from selection procedures in aviation (1987-2019).

作者信息

Stelling Dirk

机构信息

Department of Aviation and Space Psychology, Institute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 1;14:1173622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173622. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173622
PMID:37593655
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10427927/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study is to research personality trait differences across generations and the impact of age, gender and self-presentation on these traits.

METHODS

A total of 82,147 applicants (aged 17-24) for aviation training (pilot, air traffic controller), born between 1965 and 2002, were divided into three cohorts (Generation X, Y, Z). We analysed data from the (TSS) personality questionnaire, which was collected during selection procedures between 1987 and 2019. Generational differences were analysed by ANCOVAs with generation and gender as group factors, controlled by age and self-presentation (social desirability).

RESULTS

Age had no significant impact, but we observed slight gender differences in emotional stability, vitality, empathy, and self-presentation across all generations. The generational differences found exhibited extremely small effect sizes, suggesting that applicants have become more extraverted, controlled (with lower aggression and higher rigidity), and inclined to present themselves in a more favourable manner.

DISCUSSION

We discuss the implications of these findings for the aviation industry and the applicability of Generation theory in personality trait research.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是探究不同代际间的人格特质差异,以及年龄、性别和自我呈现对这些特质的影响。

方法

共有82147名1965年至2002年出生的航空培训(飞行员、空中交通管制员)申请者(年龄在17 - 24岁之间)被分为三组(X代、Y代、Z代)。我们分析了1987年至2019年选拔过程中收集的(TSS)人格问卷数据。以代际和性别作为组因素,通过协方差分析(ANCOVAs)分析代际差异,并控制年龄和自我呈现(社会期望性)。

结果

年龄没有显著影响,但我们观察到在所有代际中,情绪稳定性、活力、同理心和自我呈现在性别上存在细微差异。发现的代际差异效应量极小,这表明申请者变得更加外向、自控(攻击性较低且刻板性较高),并且倾向于以更有利的方式展现自己。

讨论

我们讨论了这些发现对航空业的意义以及代际理论在人格特质研究中的适用性。

相似文献

1
Do applicants from Generation X, Y, Z differ in personality traits? data from selection procedures in aviation (1987-2019).X世代、Y世代、Z世代的求职者在性格特征上有差异吗?来自航空业选拔程序的数据(1987 - 2019年)。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 1;14:1173622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173622. eCollection 2023.
2
Is there a role for the use of aviation assessment instruments in surgical training preparation? A feasibility study.航空评估工具在外科手术培训准备中的应用是否有作用?一项可行性研究。
Postgrad Med J. 2017 Jan;93(1095):20-24. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-133984. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
3
Social desirability bias in personality testing: implications for astronaut selection.人格测试中的社会期望偏差:对宇航员选拔的影响。
Acta Astronaut. 2005 Jul-Oct;57(2-8):634-41. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.03.011.
4
Personality comparison of airline pilot incumbents, applicants, and the general population norms on the 16PF.航空公司在职飞行员、申请者与16种人格因素问卷(16PF)一般人群常模的人格比较。
Psychol Rep. 2003 Jun;92(3 Pt 1):773-80. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3.773.
5
Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews.群体选拔面试中申请人的个性与程序公平感
J Bus Psychol. 2016;31(4):569-582. doi: 10.1007/s10869-015-9430-9. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
6
On the relation between personality and job performance of airline pilots.
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1996;6(2):171-8. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0602_4.
7
Self-other agreement of personality judgments in job interviews: exploring the effects of trait, gender, age and social desirability.求职面试中个性判断的自我-他人一致性:探究特质、性别、年龄及社会赞许性的影响
Scand J Psychol. 2014 Oct;55(5):520-6. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12154. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
8
Comparing millennial and generation X medical students at one medical school.比较一所医学院校的千禧一代和X一代医学生。
Acad Med. 2006 Jun;81(6):571-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000225222.38078.47.
9
The influence of item order on intentional response distortion in the assessment of high potentials: assessing pilot applicants.项目顺序对评估高潜力人才时故意反应失真的影响:评估试点申请人。
Int J Psychol. 2014 Apr;49(2):131-9. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12015. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
10
TEMPS-A[P] temperament profile related to professional choice. Differences between applicants to become a cadet officer in the Italian Air Force or Navy.TEMPS-A[P] 气质特征与职业选择相关。申请成为意大利空军或海军学员军官的差异。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Feb 15;145(1):106-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality matters in extremely demanding environments: A bed rest performance study.在极端苛刻的环境中,性格至关重要:一项卧床休息表现研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 4;15:1444276. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1444276. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Work Values in the United States: Age, Period, and Generational Differences.美国的工作价值观:年龄、时期和代际差异。
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2019 Mar;682(1):43-59. doi: 10.1177/0002716218822291. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
2
Perfectionism is increasing over time: A meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. perfectionism 随时间推移呈上升趋势:1989 年至 2016 年出生队列差异的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Apr;145(4):410-429. doi: 10.1037/bul0000138. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
3
Personality change across the life span: Insights from a cross-cultural, longitudinal study.人生全程的人格变化:一项跨文化、纵向研究的启示。
J Pers. 2018 Jun;86(3):508-521. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12332. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
4
The conceptual link between social desirability and cultural normativity.社会期望与文化规范性之间的概念联系。
Int J Psychol. 2016 Dec;51(6):474-480. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12261. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
5
The influence of item order on intentional response distortion in the assessment of high potentials: assessing pilot applicants.项目顺序对评估高潜力人才时故意反应失真的影响:评估试点申请人。
Int J Psychol. 2014 Apr;49(2):131-9. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12015. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
6
Age and gender differences in motivational manifestations of the Big Five from age 16 to 60.从 16 岁到 60 岁,大五人格的动机表现存在年龄和性别差异。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Feb;49(2):365-83. doi: 10.1037/a0028277. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
7
Generational differences in young adults' life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966-2009.1966-2009 年,年轻人的人生目标、对他人的关注和公民取向的代际差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 May;102(5):1045-62. doi: 10.1037/a0027408. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
8
Gender Differences in Personality across the Ten Aspects of the Big Five.大五人格的十个方面的性别差异。
Front Psychol. 2011 Aug 1;2:178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178. eCollection 2011.
9
Stability and change of personality across the life course: the impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five.人格在整个生命历程中的稳定性和变化:年龄和重大生活事件对五大人格特质的均数稳定性和等级稳定性的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):862-82. doi: 10.1037/a0024950.
10
Personality development across the life span: longitudinal analyses with a national sample from Germany.人格发展贯穿一生:德国全国样本的纵向分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):847-61. doi: 10.1037/a0024298.