Suppr超能文献

滑动窗口技术在调强放射治疗中对低剂量辐射的高估

Overestimation of low-dose radiation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique.

作者信息

Vorwerk Hilke, Wagner Daniela, Seitz Björn, Christiansen Hans, Wolff Hendrik A, Hess Clemens F

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Strahlenther Onkol. 2009 Dec;185(12):821-9. doi: 10.1007/s00066-009-2028-2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze different control-system limitations on the measured dose distributions in low-dose regions of simplified intensity fields with an electronic portal imaging device to ascertain the optimal settings for the control-system limitations in the planning system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The authors created one field with an "optimal fluence" of intensity 1.0 (full dose) and one field with intensity 0.0 (no dose) in the central part of the field. The influence of different dose rates (DRs) and maximum leaf speeds (LS) on the calculated and measured dose and dose profiles were analyzed.

RESULTS

Good agreement between calculated and measured dose in the case of a field of intensity 1.0 was found. For the field with intensity 0.0, the measured dose was 20-60% lower than the dose calculated by the "actual fluence". The results were found dependent on the DR and LS.

CONCLUSION

The overestimation in regions of optimal intensity 0.0 by the planning system cannot be resolved by the user. Taking the measured dose in the region of desired intensity 1.0 and other technical limitations (like beam hold interrupts or spikes in the cross and longitudinal profiles) into consideration, the application of an LS of 2.5 cm/s and a DR of 500 MU/min is recommended in order to minimize radiation dose applied to organs at risk, which are located in regions of low intensity, like, for example, the spinal cord.

摘要

目的

使用电子射野成像装置分析简化强度场低剂量区域中不同控制系统限制对测量剂量分布的影响,以确定计划系统中控制系统限制的最佳设置。

材料与方法

作者在射野中心创建了一个强度为1.0(全剂量)的“最佳注量”射野和一个强度为0.0(无剂量)的射野。分析了不同剂量率(DR)和最大叶片速度(LS)对计算和测量的剂量及剂量分布的影响。

结果

在强度为1.0的射野情况下,计算剂量与测量剂量之间有良好的一致性。对于强度为0.0的射野,测量剂量比“实际注量”计算出的剂量低20%-60%。结果发现取决于剂量率和叶片速度。

结论

计划系统对最佳强度0.0区域的高估无法由用户解决。考虑到强度为1.0的期望区域中的测量剂量以及其他技术限制(如束流保持中断或横断面和纵断面轮廓中的尖峰),建议应用2.5 cm/s的叶片速度和500 MU/min的剂量率,以尽量减少施加到位于低强度区域(如脊髓)的危及器官的辐射剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验