• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作周期工作流程对交班实践的影响:对美国马里兰州一个内科住院医师培训项目的定性研究

The impact of duty cycle workflow on sign-out practices: a qualitative study of an internal medicine residency program in Maryland, USA.

作者信息

Lee Soo-Hoon, Desai Sanjay V, Phan Phillip H

机构信息

Strome College of Business, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 May 9;7(5):e015762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015762.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015762
PMID:28487461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5566623/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although JCAHO requires a standardised approach to handoffs, and while many standardised protocols have been tested, sign-out practices continue to vary. We believe this is due to the variability in workflow during inpatient duty cycle. We investigate the impact of such workflows on intern sign-out practices.

DESIGN

We employed a prospective, grounded theory mixed-method design.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a residency programme in the mid-Atlantic USA. Two observers randomly evaluated three types of daily sign-outs for 1 week every 3 months from September 2013 to March 2014. The compliance of each observed behaviour to JCAHO's Handoff Communication Checklist was recorded.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty one interns conducting 134 patient sign-outs were observed randomly among the 52 in the programme.

RESULTS

In the 06:00 to 07:00 sign-back, the night-cover focused on providing information on overnight events to the day interns. In the 11:00 to 12:00 sign-out, the night-cover focused on transferring task accountability to a day-cover intern before departure. In the 20:00 to 21:00 sign-out, the day interns focused on transferring responsibility of their patients to a night-cover.

CONCLUSION

Different sign-out periods had different emphases regarding information exchange, personal responsibility and task accountability. Sign-outs are context-specific, implying that across-the-board standardised sign-out protocols are likely to have limited efficacy and compliance. Standardisation may need to be relative to the specific type and purpose of each sign-out to be supported by interns.

摘要

目的

尽管联合委员会认证医院评审机构(JCAHO)要求采用标准化的交接班方法,并且许多标准化协议已经过测试,但交班实践仍存在差异。我们认为这是由于住院医师值班周期内工作流程的 variability所致。我们调查了此类工作流程对实习医生交班实践的影响。

设计

我们采用了前瞻性的、基于扎根理论的混合方法设计。

背景

该研究在美国大西洋中部地区的一个住院医师培训项目中进行。从2013年9月至2014年3月,两名观察员每3个月随机评估1周内三种类型的每日交班情况。记录每种观察到的行为对JCAHO的交接班沟通检查表的 compliance情况。

参与者

在该项目的52名实习医生中,随机观察了31名进行134次患者交班的实习医生。

结果

在06:00至07:00的接班中,夜班人员专注于向白班实习医生提供夜间事件的信息。在11:00至12:00的交班中,夜班人员专注于在离开前将任务责任移交给白班替代实习医生。在20:00至21:00的交班中,白班实习医生专注于将其患者的责任移交给夜班人员。

结论

不同的交班时间段在信息交流、个人责任和任务责任方面有不同的重点。交班是因地制宜的,这意味着全面标准化的交班协议可能效果和 compliance有限。标准化可能需要相对于每次交班的具体类型和目的,才能得到实习医生的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ce/5566623/9ab6d9f548a5/bmjopen-2016-015762f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ce/5566623/06e6bf2ec735/bmjopen-2016-015762f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ce/5566623/9ab6d9f548a5/bmjopen-2016-015762f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ce/5566623/06e6bf2ec735/bmjopen-2016-015762f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ce/5566623/9ab6d9f548a5/bmjopen-2016-015762f02.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of duty cycle workflow on sign-out practices: a qualitative study of an internal medicine residency program in Maryland, USA.工作周期工作流程对交班实践的影响:对美国马里兰州一个内科住院医师培训项目的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 May 9;7(5):e015762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015762.
2
A Randomized Cohort Controlled Trial to Compare Intern Sign-Out Training Interventions.一项比较实习医生交班培训干预措施的随机队列对照试验。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Dec;12(12):979-983. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2843.
3
A qualitative study of sign-out processes between primary and on-call residents: relationships in information exchange, responsibility and accountability.一项关于基层住院医师与值班住院医师之间交班流程的定性研究:信息交流、责任与问责关系
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(5):646-653. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx082.
4
Effect of a systems intervention on the quality and safety of patient handoffs in an internal medicine residency program.系统干预对内科学住院医师培训计划中患者交接班的质量和安全性的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Aug;28(8):986-93. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2391-7.
5
Using direct observation, formal evaluation, and an interactive curriculum to improve the sign-out practices of internal medicine interns.使用直接观察、正式评估和互动式课程来改善内科住院医师的交班实践。
Acad Med. 2010 Jul;85(7):1182-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181da8370.
6
Piloting a Structured Practice Audit to Assess ACGME Milestones in Written Handoff Communication in Internal Medicine.开展一项结构化实践审核,以评估美国研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)内科书面交接班沟通的里程碑。
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Jun;7(2):238-41. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00482.1.
7
The Impact of Environmental Context on Intern Sign-Out Quality.环境背景对实习生交班质量的影响。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;16(4):304-306. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000579.
8
Faculty member review and feedback using a sign-out checklist: improving intern written sign-out.使用交接班清单进行教员审查和反馈:改进住院医师书面交接班。
Acad Med. 2012 Aug;87(8):1125-31. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825d1215.
9
Effect of the 2011 vs 2003 duty hour regulation-compliant models on sleep duration, trainee education, and continuity of patient care among internal medicine house staff: a randomized trial.2011 年与 2003 年工时法规相符模式对内科住院医师睡眠持续时间、培训教育和患者照护连续性的影响:一项随机试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22;173(8):649-55. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2973.
10
Content counts, but context makes the difference in developing expertise: a qualitative study of how residents learn end of shift handoffs.内容很重要,但在培养专业知识方面,背景才是关键:一项关于住院医师如何学习轮班结束时交接班的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 3;18(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1350-8.

引用本文的文献

1
"Do You Know What I Know?": How Communication Norms and Recipient Design Shape the Content and Effectiveness of Patient Handoffs.“你知道我知道什么吗?”:沟通规范和接收者设计如何影响患者交接的内容和效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Feb;34(2):264-271. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4755-5. Epub 2018 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Handoffs, safety culture, and practices: evidence from the hospital survey on patient safety culture.交接班、安全文化与实践:来自医院患者安全文化调查的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 12;16:254. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1502-7.
2
Shift-to-Shift Handoff Effects on Patient Safety and Outcomes.交接班对患者安全和结局的影响。
Am J Med Qual. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):34-42. doi: 10.1177/1062860615612923. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
3
Context, culture and (non-verbal) communication affect handover quality.背景、文化和(非语言)沟通会影响交接班质量。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1:i121-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001482.
4
Use of an appreciative inquiry approach to improve resident sign-out in an era of multiple shift changes.运用欣赏式探询方法提高住院医师交接班质量(在多班制交接班时代)。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Mar;27(3):287-91. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1885-4. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
5
Commentary: time to sign off on signout.述评:是时候停止交接班了。
Acad Med. 2011 Jul;86(7):804-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31821d8409.
6
Off-hours care: not so off.非工作时间护理:并非那么“非工作”。
J Hosp Med. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-4. doi: 10.1002/jhm.887.
7
Assessing the quality of patient handoffs at care transitions.评估护理转接时患者交接的质量。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e44. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.038430.
8
After-hours complications: evaluation of the predictive accuracy of resident sign-out.下班后并发症:住院医师交班的预测准确性评估
Am Surg. 2010 Jul;76(7):682-6.
9
Patient handoffs: standardized and reliable measurement tools remain elusive.患者交接:标准化且可靠的测量工具仍难以获得。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 Feb;36(2):52-61. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36011-9.
10
Understanding communication during hospitalist service changes: a mixed methods study.理解医院服务变革期间的沟通:一项混合方法研究。
J Hosp Med. 2009 Nov;4(9):535-40. doi: 10.1002/jhm.523.