• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大五人格、社会世界观和意识形态态度:双过程认知动机模型的进一步检验。

Big-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational model.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2009 Oct;149(5):545-61. doi: 10.1080/00224540903232308.

DOI:10.1080/00224540903232308
PMID:20014520
Abstract

In this study, we extended the Dual Process Model of Ideology and Prejudice by incorporating the Five-Factor Model of Personality (N = 924). Disagreeable people tended to view the social world as competitive, which in turn predicted heightened motivations for group-based dominance and superiority (Social Dominance Orientation or SDO), whereas people low in Openness to Experience and high in Conscientiousness directly expressed heightened security-cohesion motivations (Right-Wing Authoritarianism or RWA). Other personality dimensions were weakly associated with RWA, and these effects were mediated by dangerous worldview. Multiple distinct aspects of personality predict SDO and RWA both directly and indirectly through worldviews, but we found little evidence for the possibility that personality alters the extent to which worldviews (once formed) predict SDO and RWA.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们通过纳入人格的五因素模型(N=924)来扩展意识形态和偏见的双重过程模型。不讨人喜欢的人往往认为社会世界是竞争的,这反过来又预示着基于群体的支配和优越的动机增强(社会支配倾向或 SDO),而开放性体验低和责任心高的人则直接表达了增强的安全凝聚力动机(右翼威权主义或 RWA)。其他人格维度与 RWA 弱相关,这些影响是通过危险的世界观来介导的。人格的多个不同方面既可以直接也可以间接地通过世界观来预测 SDO 和 RWA,但我们几乎没有证据表明人格会改变世界观(一旦形成)预测 SDO 和 RWA 的程度。

相似文献

1
Big-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational model.大五人格、社会世界观和意识形态态度:双过程认知动机模型的进一步检验。
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Oct;149(5):545-61. doi: 10.1080/00224540903232308.
2
The personality bases of ideology: a one-year longitudinal study.意识形态的人格基础:一项为期一年的纵向研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep-Oct;150(5):540-59. doi: 10.1080/00224540903365364.
3
The dual process model of ideology and prejudice: a longitudinal test during a global recession.双重思想与偏见模型:全球经济衰退期间的纵向测试。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jul-Aug;153(4):448-66. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2012.757544.
4
Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: a dual-process motivational model.人格、意识形态、偏见和政治:一种双重加工动机模型。
J Pers. 2010 Dec;78(6):1861-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
5
Personality and prejudice: a meta-analysis and theoretical review.个性与偏见:一项元分析及理论综述
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2008 Aug;12(3):248-79. doi: 10.1177/1088868308319226.
6
Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups.右翼威权主义和社会支配取向对外群体态度的差异影响及其通过来自外群体的威胁和与外群体的竞争所起的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):684-96. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284282.
7
Individual differences in ideological attitudes and prejudice: evidence from peer-report data.个体在意识形态态度和偏见上的差异:来自同伴报告数据的证据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Aug;103(2):343-61. doi: 10.1037/a0028706. Epub 2012 May 28.
8
The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model.意识形态与偏见的心理基础:对双加工模型的检验
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jul;83(1):75-93.
9
Antecedents of men's hostile and benevolent sexism: the dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism.男性敌对性和善意性性别歧视的前因:社会支配取向和右翼权威主义的双重作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Feb;33(2):160-72. doi: 10.1177/0146167206294745.
10
The balanced ideological antipathy model: explaining the effects of ideological attitudes on inter-group antipathy across the political spectrum.平衡的意识形态反感模型:解释意识形态态度对整个政治光谱上群体间反感的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Dec;41(12):1607-22. doi: 10.1177/0146167215603713. Epub 2015 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The core tendencies underlying prosocial behavior: Testing a person-situation framework.亲社会行为的核心倾向:检验人境框架
J Pers. 2025 Jun;93(3):633-652. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12957. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
2
The dispositional need for cognitive closure indirectly predicts mock jurors' sentencing decisions through right-wing authoritarianism.认知闭合的倾向性需求通过右翼威权主义间接预测模拟陪审员的量刑决定。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Apr 20;31(2):161-178. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2175072. eCollection 2024.
3
Academic Motivation of Students Experiencing Person-Environment Misfit in Social Work Educational Settings: The Role of Social Dominance Orientation.
社会工作教育环境中经历人境失配的学生的学业动机:社会支配取向的作用
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Jan 24;14(2):272-283. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14020018.
4
The Pathway between Social Dominance Orientation and Drop out from Hierarchy-Attenuating Contexts: The Role of Moral Foundations and Person-Environment Misfit.社会支配取向与从等级制度弱化情境中退出之间的路径:道德基础和人境失配的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 28;13(9):712. doi: 10.3390/bs13090712.
5
Attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccine mandate: The role of psychological characteristics and partisan self-identification.对新冠疫苗强制接种的态度:心理特征和党派自我认同的作用。
Pers Individ Dif. 2023 May;206:112119. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2023.112119. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
6
Linking primary emotional traits to ideological attitudes and personal value types.将主要情绪特质与意识形态态度和个人价值观类型联系起来。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 3;18(1):e0279885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279885. eCollection 2023.
7
No man is an island: Psychological underpinnings of prosociality in the midst of the COVID-19 outbreak.没有人是一座孤岛:新冠疫情期间亲社会行为的心理基础。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Mar;171:110534. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110534. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
8
Revisiting the Measurement of Anomie.重新审视失范的测量
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 6;11(7):e0158370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158370. eCollection 2016.