Crawford Jarret T, Mallinas Stephanie R, Furman Bryan J
The College of New Jersey, Ewing, USA
The College of New Jersey, Ewing, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Dec;41(12):1607-22. doi: 10.1177/0146167215603713. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
We introduce the balanced ideological antipathy (BIA) model, which challenges assumptions that right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) predict inter-group antipathy per se. Rather, the effects of RWA and SDO on antipathy should depend on the target's political orientation and political objectives, the specific components of RWA, and the type of antipathy expressed. Consistent with the model, two studies (N = 585) showed that the Traditionalism component of RWA positively and negatively predicted both political intolerance and prejudice toward tradition-threatening and -reaffirming groups, respectively, whereas SDO positively and negatively predicted prejudice (and to some extent political intolerance) toward hierarchy-attenuating and -enhancing groups, respectively. Critically, the Conservatism component of RWA positively predicted political intolerance (but not prejudice) toward each type of target group, suggesting it captures the anti-democratic impulse at the heart of authoritarianism. Recommendations for future research on the relationship between ideological attitudes and inter-group antipathy are discussed.
我们引入了平衡意识形态反感(BIA)模型,该模型挑战了以下假设:右翼威权主义(RWA)和社会支配取向(SDO)本身就能预测群体间的反感。相反,RWA和SDO对反感的影响应取决于目标群体的政治取向和政治目标、RWA的具体组成部分以及所表达的反感类型。与该模型一致,两项研究(N = 585)表明,RWA的传统主义成分分别对政治不容忍以及对威胁传统和重申传统的群体的偏见产生正向和负向预测,而SDO分别对削弱等级制度和强化等级制度的群体的偏见(以及在某种程度上对政治不容忍)产生正向和负向预测。至关重要的是,RWA的保守主义成分对每种类型的目标群体的政治不容忍(而非偏见)产生正向预测,这表明它抓住了威权主义核心的反民主冲动。文中还讨论了对未来意识形态态度与群体间反感关系研究的建议。