Medical Center of Health Science, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-0001, Japan.
Metabolism. 2010 Jun;59(6):834-40. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2009.09.032. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
The definition of metabolic syndrome places emphasis on health care for persons at risk. However, whether an obesity index should be a mandatory component of the definition and whether obesity indices can identify metabolic risks satisfactorily require further exploration. Therefore, we investigated the effectiveness of various anthropometric obesity indices in identifying the clustering of 2 or more American Heart Association (AHA)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)/International Diabetes Federation (IDF)-defined metabolic risk factors (hypertension, hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) for metabolic syndrome and those of other metabolic risk factors (high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hyperuricemia, high gamma-glutamyltransferase, fatty liver) in 6141 men and 2137 women. The anthropometric indices were the following: (1) for both sexes--various levels of waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) including 0.5 and body mass index (BMI) of 23 and 25 kg/m(2); (2) for men and women individually--waist circumference (W) 90/80 cm (AHA/NHLBI/IDF for ethnic groups), W 85/90 cm (Japan Society for the Study of Obesity), and combined W and BMI: W 85/90 cm and/or BMI 25 kg/m(2) (Japanese government). The results showed the following: (1) The optimal value for WHtR was 0.5 for AHA/NHLBI/IDF-defined risk factors and approximately 0.5 for other risk factors in both sexes. (2) The sensitivities of various proposed obesity indices for identifying clustering of defined and other risk factors varied between 74.4% (WHtR 0.5) and 36.3% (BMI 25) and between 80.5% (WHtR 0.5) and 43.7% (BMI 25) in men, and varied between 65.6% (WHtR 0.5) and 16.8% (W 90 cm) and between 82.3% (WHtR 0.5) and 28.2% (W 90 cm) in women. Because the sensitivities of many anthropometric indices were very low, a reassessment of the effectiveness of obesity indices in evaluating metabolic risks and especially their suitability as a single mandatory component of metabolic syndrome is urgently needed. However, WHtR 0.5 provides a very useful algorithm for screening persons at risk.
代谢综合征的定义强调了对高危人群的健康护理。然而,肥胖指数是否应该作为定义的强制性组成部分,以及肥胖指数是否能令人满意地识别代谢风险,这些都需要进一步探讨。因此,我们调查了各种人体测量肥胖指数在识别 2 个或更多美国心脏协会(AHA)/美国国立心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)/国际糖尿病联合会(IDF)定义的代谢危险因素(高血压、高血糖、高三酰甘油血症和低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇)聚集方面的有效性,以及其他代谢危险因素(高低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高尿酸血症、高γ-谷氨酰转移酶、脂肪肝)在 6141 名男性和 2137 名女性中的有效性。人体测量指数如下:(1)男女通用——各种水平的腰高比(WHtR),包括 0.5 和身体质量指数(BMI)为 23 和 25kg/m²;(2)男女个体——腰围(W)90/80cm(AHA/NHLBI/IDF 适用于不同种族),W85/90cm(日本肥胖学会),以及 W 和 BMI 联合:W85/90cm 和/或 BMI25kg/m²(日本政府)。结果表明:(1)对于 AHA/NHLBI/IDF 定义的危险因素,WHtR 的最佳值为 0.5,对于其他危险因素,男女的最佳值约为 0.5。(2)各种建议的肥胖指数在识别定义和其他危险因素的聚类方面的敏感性在男性中变化范围为 74.4%(WHtR0.5)至 36.3%(BMI25)和 80.5%(WHtR0.5)至 43.7%(BMI25),在女性中变化范围为 65.6%(WHtR0.5)至 16.8%(W90cm)和 82.3%(WHtR0.5)至 28.2%(W90cm)。由于许多人体测量指数的敏感性非常低,因此迫切需要重新评估肥胖指数在评估代谢风险方面的有效性,尤其是将其作为代谢综合征的单一强制性组成部分的适宜性。然而,WHtR0.5 提供了一种非常有用的筛查高危人群的算法。