Al-Odat Areej Zaal, Ahmad Mousa Numan, Haddad Fares Halim
Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2012 Jan-Mar;6(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
To set references and evaluate the associations between the predictive powers of the anthropometric indices of obesity, particularly central obesity, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist to hip ratio (WHpR) and waist to height ratio (WHtR), and the risk factor accumulations of ≥ 2 of the components of the metabolic syndrome (MS) in a group of Jordanian men and women.
Five hundreds subjects were randomly selected from among the visitors attending several family clinics in Amman. Obesity was assessed using BMI, WC, WHpR and WHtR anthropometric indices. MS risk factors as defined by the International Diabetes Federation were determined. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the predictive powers and the cut off points of each index associated with increased MS risk.
There were 212 men and 288 women with age ranged 20-85 years. Optimal cut off points of BMI, WC, WHpR for MS diagnosis in men were 28.4 kg/m(2), 97.8 cm and 0.89, respectively. In women, these were 30.3 kg/m(2), 95.6 cm and 0.84, respectively. WHtR was 0.61 in both genders. Area under the curve (AUC) of ROC analysis for identifying of MS (≥ 2 risk factors) was the highest for WHpR (AUC=0.71), followed by WHtR (AUC=0.67), WC (AUC=0.64) and BMI (AUC=0.59) in men; whereas in women WHpR, WHtR and WC were almost equal (AUC=0.76, 0.75 and 0.74, respectively), followed by BMI (AUC=0.67). Correlation coefficients (r) between WHpR and MS risk factors were the strongest among the other obesity indices, followed by WC and WHtR. WHpR correlated significantly with FBG (r=0.27, p<0.01), systolic blood pressure (r=0.20, p<0.01), TGs (r=0.24, p<0.01) and HDL-C (r=-0.39, p<0.01). The respective r-values between WC and WHtR and each MS risk factors were: FBG (r=0.15, p<0.001 or r=0.13, p<0.01), systolic blood pressure (r=0.16, p<0.01 or r=0.11, p<0.05), TGs (r=0.20, p<0.01 or r=0.14, p<0.01) and HDL-C (r=-0.25, p<0.01 or r=-0.11, p<0.01).
This study showed that BMI tended to be the weakest index for identifying MS risk factors in both sexes. WHpR exhibited the best predictive index for MS, particularly in men. Almost similar predictive powers of WHtR, WHpR and WC for identifying MS risk factors were seen in women. WHtR had the highest sensitivity for MS diagnosis among obesity indices in men and its boundary value was the same for both men and women. These cut off values of obesity particularly waist circumference should be advocated and used in Arab Jordanians until larger cross sectional studies shows different results.
设定参考标准,并评估肥胖的人体测量指数(尤其是中心性肥胖,包括体重指数(BMI)、腰围(WC)、腰臀比(WHpR)和腰高比(WHtR))的预测能力与一组约旦男性和女性中代谢综合征(MS)≥2种成分的危险因素聚集之间的关联。
从安曼几家家庭诊所的就诊者中随机选取500名受试者。使用BMI、WC、WHpR和WHtR人体测量指数评估肥胖情况。确定国际糖尿病联盟定义的MS危险因素。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析来确定每个指数与MS风险增加相关的预测能力和切点。
有212名男性和288名女性,年龄在20 - 85岁之间。男性中用于MS诊断的BMI、WC、WHpR的最佳切点分别为28.4 kg/m²、97.8 cm和0.89。女性中,这些切点分别为30.3 kg/m²、95.6 cm和0.84。男女的WHtR均为0.61。在男性中,用于识别MS(≥2个危险因素)的ROC分析曲线下面积(AUC),WHpR最高(AUC = 0.71),其次是WHtR(AUC = 0.67)、WC(AUC = 0.64)和BMI(AUC = 0.59);而在女性中,WHpR、WHtR和WC几乎相等(AUC分别为0.76、0.75和0.74),其次是BMI(AUC = 0.67)。在其他肥胖指数中,WHpR与MS危险因素之间的相关系数(r)最强,其次是WC和WHtR。WHpR与空腹血糖(FBG)显著相关(r = 0.27,p < 0.01)、收缩压(r = 0.20,p < 0.01)、甘油三酯(TGs)(r = 0.24,p < 0.01)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL - C)(r = -0.39,p < 0.01)。WC和WHtR与各MS危险因素之间的相应r值分别为:FBG(r = 0.15,p < 0.001或r = 0.13,p < 0.01)、收缩压(r = 0.16,p < 0.01或r = 0.11,p < 0.05)、TGs(r = 0.20,p < 0.01或r = 0.14,p < 0.01)和HDL - C(r = -0.25,p < 0.01或r = -0.11,p < 0.01)。
本研究表明,BMI在识别男女MS危险因素方面往往是最弱的指标。WHpR对MS表现出最佳的预测指标,尤其是在男性中。在女性中,WHtR、WHpR和WC在识别MS危险因素方面具有几乎相似的预测能力。在男性肥胖指数中,WHtR对MS诊断具有最高的敏感性,且其临界值男女相同。在更大规模的横断面研究显示不同结果之前,可以在阿拉伯约旦人群中提倡并使用这些肥胖的切点值,尤其是腰围的切点值。