Institute of Radiology, University of Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2010 Jun;20(6):1356-65. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1684-z. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
Quantitative determination of myocardial perfusion currently involves time-consuming postprocessing. This retrospective study presents automatic postprocessing consisting of image registration and image segmentation to obtain regional signal intensity time courses and quantitative perfusion values.
The automatic postprocessing was tested in 75 examinations in volunteers and patients, 57 at rest and 18 under adenosine-induced stress, and compared with a manual evaluation. In a substudy consisting of 10 examinations, the interobserver variability of the manual evaluation was investigated.
Manual evaluation resulted in perfusion values with a median of 0.70 ml/g/min ranging from 0.03 to 3.68 ml/g/min. For all 75 examinations, the variability (standard deviation of the differences) between automatic and manual evaluation was 0.34 ml/g/min. Interobserver variability was of a similar order, 0.35 ml/g/min for all measurements.
Automatic evaluation was successfully applied to all datasets giving results equivalent to manual evaluation. The time of user interaction for one single slice could be reduced from 25 min for manual evaluation to less than 1 min using the automatic algorithm. This reduction may allow quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging to become a routine clinical procedure.
心肌灌注的定量测定目前涉及耗时的后处理。本回顾性研究提出了自动后处理,包括图像配准和图像分割,以获得区域信号强度时间曲线和定量灌注值。
在志愿者和患者的 75 次检查中测试了自动后处理,其中 57 次为静息状态,18 次为腺苷诱导的应激状态,并与手动评估进行了比较。在一个由 10 次检查组成的子研究中,研究了手动评估的观察者间变异性。
手动评估得到的灌注值中位数为 0.70 ml/g/min,范围为 0.03 至 3.68 ml/g/min。对于所有 75 次检查,自动和手动评估之间的差异(差异的标准差)为 0.34 ml/g/min。观察者间的变异性也相似,所有测量的变异性为 0.35 ml/g/min。
自动评估成功应用于所有数据集,结果与手动评估相当。使用自动算法,单个切片的用户交互时间可以从手动评估的 25 分钟减少到不到 1 分钟。这种减少可能使定量磁共振灌注成像成为一种常规的临床程序。