Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606-3390, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2009 Jul;91(4):357-64. doi: 10.1080/00223890902936116.
We provide a meta-analytic review of interrater reliability for scoring the 2 most commonly studied Rorschach (2003) aggression measures: (a) The Elizur (1949) Hostility Scale and its main derivative scoring systems (Holtzman, Thorpe, Swartz, & Herron, 1961; Murstein, 1956) and (b) Holt's (1977, 2005) aggression variables. Substantial reliability was observed for both Elizur's hostility score (e.g., weighted mean summary score correlation = .91, N = 1,279) and Holt's aggression variables (e.g., weighted mean summary score correlation = .84, N = 226). These meta-analytic data suggest that like the contemporary variables included in Exner's Comprehensive System or Gacono and Meloy's (1994) extended aggression scores, the historically important Elizur scoring systems and Holt aggression variables can be scored reliably. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of the Journal of Personality Assessment for the following free supplemental resources: a document of results examining publication source, scoring system, amount of rater training, and severity of aggressive pathology in the sample as potential moderators of reliability.]
我们对评分 2 种最常研究的罗夏（2003）攻击性指标的评分者间信度进行了元分析综述：（a）Elizur（1949）敌意量表及其主要衍生评分系统（Holtzman、Thorpe、Swartz 和 Herron，1961；Murstein，1956）和（b）Holt 的（1977，2005）攻击性变量。两种指标的 Elizur 敌意得分（例如，加权平均综合得分相关性 =.91，N = 1279）和 Holt 的攻击性变量（例如，加权平均综合得分相关性 =.84，N = 226）均具有相当高的信度。这些元分析数据表明，与 Exner 的综合系统或 Gacono 和 Meloy（1994）扩展攻击性得分中包含的当代变量一样，历史上重要的 Elizur 评分系统和 Holt 攻击性变量可以可靠地评分。[本文有补充材料。请访问期刊《人格评估杂志》的出版商在线版本，获取以下免费补充资源：一份检验信度的结果文件，检验了潜在的信度调节因素，包括出版物来源、评分系统、评分者培训量和样本中攻击性病理的严重程度。]
