Nursing Program, University of Washington, Tacoma, WA 98402, USA.
Nurs Philos. 2010 Jan;11(1):53-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2009.00419.x.
With questions raised as to whether or not nursing knowledge should be developed from extant conceptual/theoretical models or from practice-based environments, this paper utilizes Kuhn's disciplinary matrix and Laudan's model of consensus formation to explore the changing nature of the discipline's structural matrix. Kuhn's notion that a discipline's structural matrix includes symbolic generalizations, models and exemplars, and Laudan's view that a maturing discipline embraces factual, methodological, and axiological (goals and aims) knowledge, and that context and discourse are also involved in advancing a discipline is described as a means for reconciling the source of nursing knowledge. This paper posits that shared axiological goals connect both theorists and practitioners, and resolve potential conflicts as to viable sources of nursing knowledge. Through shared goals that include humanization, meaning, quality of life, caring, consciousness, transcendence, and presence, which bridge both theoretical and practice approaches, nursing's charge to contribute to the good of society is fulfilled.
针对护理知识究竟应该从现有概念/理论模型中发展而来,还是应该从基于实践的环境中发展而来的问题,本文利用库恩的学科矩阵和劳丹的共识形成模型来探讨该学科结构矩阵的变化性质。库恩认为学科的结构矩阵包括符号概括、模型和范例,而劳丹则认为一个成熟的学科包含事实、方法和价值(目标和宗旨)知识,并且语境和论述也参与到推进学科的过程中。这被描述为一种协调护理知识来源的方法。本文假设,共同的价值观目标将理论家与实践者联系起来,并解决了关于护理知识可行来源的潜在冲突。通过包括人性化、意义、生活质量、关怀、意识、超越和在场等跨越理论和实践方法的共同目标,护理为社会的利益做出贡献的使命得以实现。