Suppr超能文献

母亲出生月份对生殖性能的影响:控制社会人口混杂因素。

The impact of maternal birth month on reproductive performance: controlling for socio-demographic confounders.

机构信息

Tholius Research, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

出版信息

J Biosoc Sci. 2010 Mar;42(2):177-94. doi: 10.1017/S002193200999054X. Epub 2009 Dec 17.

Abstract

Based on a 1900 census sample of 34,166 post-reproductive females (> or =45 years), the birth month effect was put to the test, for both lifetime fertility as well as child survival, controlling for maternal birth cohort (1826-1835, 1836-1845, 1846-1855), Duncan's SEI, urbanity, nativity, literacy and marital duration. Testing for potential cohort effects did not indicate a temporal trend in fertility by maternal birth month (seasonal Mann-Kendall test, p=0.578), while a minute increase in offspring survival was detected (p<0.001, Sen's estimator of slope=0.02, 95% CI=0.02 to 0.03). Further analyses of the maternal birth month effect on child survival were therefore seized. For lifetime fertility, ANOVA results indicated that maternal birth month was a major predictor for total offspring count (F11, 33606=1809.0, p<0.001), accounting for 37.2% of the total variability. In addition to main effects, a statistically significant interaction effect was observed (F538, 33606=2.2, p<0.001), with a corresponding effect size of eta2=0.40. Planned contrasts revealed that birth-month-specific differences in fertility achieved statistical significance (F11, 31798=1712.9, p<0.001), while post-hoc multiple comparisons for literacy and nativity displayed an inverse relationship with fertility, which meets demographic expectations. Controlling for all factors of interest, models of cohort-specific offspring counts (independent ANOVAs for 1826-1835: F157, 3467=26.3, p<0.001; 1836-1845: F182, 10299=75.5, p<0.001; 1846-1855: F199, 19859=137.9, p<0.001) indicated that women born in the first half of the year (particularly, January, February, April and May) achieved above-average parity, while those born in the latter half (namely, July, October, November and December) displayed markedly lower fertility averages. These monthly disparities are in line with previous observations and appear to be linked to seasonal optimal ripening of the oocyte or seasonal preovulatory over-ripeness ovopathy (Jongbloet, 1992).

摘要

基于 1900 年对 34166 名已过生育期女性(≥45 岁)的普查样本,本研究检验了生育月份效应,既包括终生生育力,也包括子女存活率,同时控制了母体出生队列(1826-1835 年、1836-1845 年、1846-1855 年)、邓肯社会经济指数(Duncan's SEI)、城市性、出生地、文化程度和婚姻持续时间。潜在的队列效应检验并未表明母体生育月份与生育力呈时间趋势(季节性曼肯德尔检验,p=0.578),而子女存活率略有上升(p<0.001,Sen 斜率估计值=0.02,95%CI=0.02 至 0.03)。因此,进一步分析了母体生育月份对子女存活率的影响。对于终生生育力,方差分析结果表明,母体生育月份是总后代数量的主要预测因素(F11, 33606=1809.0,p<0.001),占总变异性的 37.2%。除了主效应外,还观察到了统计学上显著的交互效应(F538, 33606=2.2,p<0.001),对应的 eta2 值为 0.40。计划对比显示,生育月份对生育力的影响具有统计学意义(F11, 31798=1712.9,p<0.001),而文化程度和出生地的事后多重比较显示与生育力呈负相关,这符合人口统计学的预期。在控制所有感兴趣的因素后,特定队列后代数量的模型(1826-1835 年的独立方差分析:F157, 3467=26.3,p<0.001;1836-1845 年:F182, 10299=75.5,p<0.001;1846-1855 年:F199, 19859=137.9,p<0.001)表明,上半年(特别是 1 月、2 月、4 月和 5 月)出生的女性生育力高于平均水平,而下半年(即 7 月、10 月、11 月和 12 月)出生的女性生育力明显较低。这些月度差异与之前的观察结果一致,似乎与卵母细胞的季节性最佳成熟或季节性排卵前过度成熟卵病(Jongbloet,1992)有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验