• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区分复合音的相干和非相干频率调制。

Discriminating between coherent and incoherent frequency modulation of complex tones.

作者信息

Carlyon R P

机构信息

Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, Sussex University, England.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Jan;89(1):329-40. doi: 10.1121/1.400468.

DOI:10.1121/1.400468
PMID:2002172
Abstract

A series of experiments measured the discrimination by human listeners of frequency-modulated complex tones which differed only in the coherence of frequency modulation (FM). For the coherently modulated tones all components were modulated by the same 5-Hz sinusoid, and by the same percentage of their starting frequencies, whereas for the incoherently modulated tones the modulation of one (target) component differed from that of the rest. When the 400-ms complex was composed of consecutive harmonics of a common fundamental, performance improved monotonically with increases in modulator delay, and was nearly perfect at the longest delays. When the complex was inharmonic, performance was near chance at all modular delays, both for component frequencies between 1500 and 2500 Hz, and for component frequencies between 400 and 800 Hz. It is argued that listeners detected incoherence in harmonic complexes by detecting the resulting mistuning of the target component. This conclusion was supported by the finding that listeners were usually at least as good at detecting a fixed mistuning of the center component of a harmonic complex as they were at detecting a modulator phase delay imposed on it. A final experiment, with a stimulus duration of 1 s and slower modulation rates, showed that listeners could detect incoherence for some inharmonic complexes. However, detection was worse than for harmonic complexes and was, it is argued, based on weak harmonicity cues. The results of all experiments point to the absence of an across-frequency mechanism specific to the detection of FM incoherence.

摘要

一系列实验测量了人类听众对仅在调频(FM)连贯性上存在差异的调频复合音的辨别能力。对于连贯调制的音调,所有成分都由相同的5赫兹正弦波调制,且调制频率占其起始频率的百分比相同;而对于非连贯调制的音调,一个(目标)成分的调制与其他成分不同。当400毫秒的复合音由一个共同基频的连续谐波组成时,随着调制器延迟的增加,辨别性能单调提高,在最长延迟时几乎达到完美。当复合音为非谐波时,对于1500至2500赫兹之间的成分频率以及400至800赫兹之间的成分频率,在所有调制延迟下的辨别性能都接近随机水平。有人认为,听众通过检测目标成分产生的失谐来检测谐波复合音中的不连贯性。这一结论得到了以下发现的支持:听众通常至少同样擅长检测谐波复合音中心成分的固定失谐,就像他们擅长检测施加在其上的调制器相位延迟一样。最后一个实验,刺激持续时间为1秒且调制速率较慢,结果表明听众能够检测到一些非谐波复合音中的不连贯性。然而,检测效果比谐波复合音差,并且据认为是基于微弱的谐波线索。所有实验结果都表明不存在专门用于检测调频不连贯性的跨频率机制。

相似文献

1
Discriminating between coherent and incoherent frequency modulation of complex tones.区分复合音的相干和非相干频率调制。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Jan;89(1):329-40. doi: 10.1121/1.400468.
2
The effect of modulation rate on the detection of frequency modulation and mistuning of complex tones.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jul;108(1):304-15. doi: 10.1121/1.429466.
3
The psychophysics of concurrent sound segregation.同时进行的声音分离的心理物理学
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jun 29;336(1278):347-55. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0068.
4
Further evidence against an across-frequency mechanism specific to the detection of frequency modulation (FM) incoherence between resolved frequency components.进一步的证据表明,不存在一种特定于检测分辨频率成分之间频率调制(FM)不连贯性的跨频率机制。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Feb;95(2):949-61. doi: 10.1121/1.410012.
5
Thresholds for the detection of inharmonicity in complex tones.复杂音调中不和谐性检测的阈值
J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 May;77(5):1861-7. doi: 10.1121/1.391937.
6
Frequency discrimination of complex tones with overlapping and non-overlapping harmonics.具有重叠和非重叠谐波的复合音调的频率辨别
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 May;87(5):2163-77. doi: 10.1121/1.399184.
7
Detecting coherent and incoherent frequency modulation.检测相干和非相干频率调制。
Hear Res. 2000 Feb;140(1-2):173-88. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00200-2.
8
Thresholds for hearing mistuned partials as separate tones in harmonic complexes.在谐波复合体中,将失谐分音听作单独音调的听力阈值。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Aug;80(2):479-83. doi: 10.1121/1.394043.
9
Does fundamental-frequency discrimination measure virtual pitch discrimination?基频辨别是否能测量虚拟音高辨别?
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Oct;128(4):1930-42. doi: 10.1121/1.3478786.
10
Auditory processing of real and illusory changes in frequency modulation (FM) phase.频率调制(FM)相位的真实和虚幻变化的听觉处理。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Dec;116(6):3629-39. doi: 10.1121/1.1811474.

引用本文的文献

1
Ecological origins of perceptual grouping principles in the auditory system.听觉系统中知觉分组原则的生态起源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 10;116(50):25355-25364. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903887116. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
2
Inharmonic speech reveals the role of harmonicity in the cocktail party problem.不和谐的语音揭示了和谐性在鸡尾酒会问题中的作用。
Nat Commun. 2018 May 29;9(1):2122. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04551-8.
3
Recovering sound sources from embedded repetition.从嵌入重复中恢复声源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 18;108(3):1188-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004765108. Epub 2011 Jan 3.
4
Cortical mechanisms for the segregation and representation of acoustic textures.皮层机制对声音纹理的分离和表示。
J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 10;30(6):2070-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5378-09.2010.