• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对方式和策略:有学习障碍和无学习障碍的青少年学生的比较。

Coping styles and strategies: a comparison of adolescent students with and without learning disabilities.

机构信息

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 2010 Jan-Feb;43(1):77-85. doi: 10.1177/0022219409345010.

DOI:10.1177/0022219409345010
PMID:20023178
Abstract

In this study, the authors compared the results of a coping measure completed by 98 seventh through ninth grade students who were assessed as having learning disabilities with published means from the general Australian student population. The Adolescent Coping Scale was the measure used. The results suggested higher use by students aged 12 to 13 years who had learning disabilities of an overall nonproductive coping style and in particular of the nonproductive strategies of ignoring the problem and not coping. Although there was no difference in overall productive or nonproductive coping style for 14- to 15-year-olds, the students in this age group who had learning disabilities reported higher use of the strategies of not coping and ignoring the problem. These findings are discussed in relation to a need for interventions that give students who have learning disabilities strategies that address the risk of a passive coping style.

摘要

在这项研究中,作者比较了 98 名 7 至 9 年级被评估为有学习障碍的学生完成的应对措施的结果,这些学生与澳大利亚普通学生群体的已公布数据进行了比较。使用的衡量标准是青少年应对量表。结果表明,年龄在 12 至 13 岁之间、有学习障碍的学生更倾向于采用整体非生产性应对方式,特别是采用忽视问题和不应对的非生产性策略。尽管 14 至 15 岁年龄段的学生在整体生产性或非生产性应对方式方面没有差异,但该年龄段有学习障碍的学生报告称,他们更倾向于采用不应对和忽视问题的策略。这些发现与需要干预措施有关,这些干预措施为有学习障碍的学生提供了应对被动应对方式风险的策略。

相似文献

1
Coping styles and strategies: a comparison of adolescent students with and without learning disabilities.应对方式和策略:有学习障碍和无学习障碍的青少年学生的比较。
J Learn Disabil. 2010 Jan-Feb;43(1):77-85. doi: 10.1177/0022219409345010.
2
Coping successfully with dyslexia: an initial study of an inclusive school-based resilience programme.成功应对诵读困难:一项基于包容性学校的复原力方案的初步研究。
Dyslexia. 2013 May;19(2):113-30. doi: 10.1002/dys.1453. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
3
Boys play sport and girls turn to others: age, gender and ethnicity as determinants of coping.男孩参与体育运动,女孩则求助于他人:年龄、性别和种族作为应对方式的决定因素。
J Adolesc. 1993 Sep;16(3):253-66. doi: 10.1006/jado.1993.1024.
4
[Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population].应对方式的多维评估:法国人群中简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)的效度验证
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18.
5
Psychosocial factors and coping strategies of adolescents in a rural Pennsylvania high school.宾夕法尼亚州一所农村高中青少年的社会心理因素及应对策略
Public Health Nurs. 2006 Nov-Dec;23(6):523-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2006.00589.x.
6
Explanatory style and college students with ADHD and LD.解释风格与患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和学习障碍(LD)的大学生
J Atten Disord. 2007 Feb;10(3):299-305. doi: 10.1177/1087054706292103.
7
[Influence of sociodemographic variables on coping styles, social stress, and sexual sensation seeking in adolescents].[社会人口统计学变量对青少年应对方式、社会压力和性感觉寻求的影响]
Psicothema. 2009 May;21(2):220-6.
8
Hong Kong baccalaureate nursing students' stress and their coping strategies in clinical practice.香港学士学位护理专业学生在临床实习中的压力及其应对策略。
J Prof Nurs. 2009 Sep-Oct;25(5):307-13. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.01.018.
9
Coping responses of adolescents with and without mild learning handicaps.有和没有轻度学习障碍的青少年的应对反应。
Ment Retard. 1989 Oct;27(5):311-6.
10
[Prospective study of post-traumatic stress in victims of terrorist attacks].[恐怖袭击受害者创伤后应激的前瞻性研究]
Encephale. 2001 Sep-Oct;27(5):393-400.

引用本文的文献

1
Proactive coping and social-emotional adjustment among students with and without learning disabilities in Kerala, India.印度喀拉拉邦有学习障碍和无学习障碍学生的积极应对与社会情感调适
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 6;13:949708. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.949708. eCollection 2022.