Division of Clinical Neuroscience and Behavioral Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;51(7):827-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02201.x. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
Opponent-process theories of externalizing disorders (ExD) attribute them to some combination of overactive reward processing systems and/or underactive behavior inhibition systems. Reward processing has been indexed by recruitment of incentive-motivational neurocircuitry of the ventral striatum (VS), including nucleus accumbens (NAcc).
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with an incentive task to determine whether externalizing symptomatology in adolescence is correlated with an enhanced VS recruitment by cues for rewards, or by deliveries of rewards. Twelve community-recruited adolescents with externalizing disorders (AED) and 12 age/gender-matched controls responded to targets to win or avoid losing $0, $0.20, $1, $5, or an unknown amount (ranging from $0.20 to $5).
Cues to respond for rewards activated the NAcc (relative to cues for no incentive), in both subject groups similarly, with greatest NAcc recruitment by cues for the largest reward. Loss-anticipatory NAcc signal increase was detected in a volume-of-interest analysis - but this increase occurred only in trials when subjects hit the target. Relative to controls, AED showed significantly elevated NAcc activation by a linear contrast between reward notification versus notification of failure to win reward. In a post hoc reanalysis, VS and pregenual anterior cingulate activation by the reward versus non-reward outcome contrast also directly correlated with Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Externalizing total scores (across all subjects) in lieu of a binary diagnosis. Finally, both groups showed right insula activation by loss notifications (contrasted with avoided losses).
Externalizing behavior, whether assessed dimensionally with a questionnaire, or in the form of a diagnostic categorization, is associated with an exaggerated limbic response to outcomes of reward-directed behavior. This could be a neurobiological signature of the behavioral sensitivity to laboratory reward delivery that is characteristic of children with externalizing symptomatology. Of interest is future research on incentive-motivational processing in more severe, clinically referred AED.
外显障碍(ExD)的对立过程理论将其归因于奖励加工系统过度活跃和/或行为抑制系统不活跃的某种组合。奖励加工已通过腹侧纹状体(VS)的激励动机神经回路的募集来标记,包括伏隔核(NAcc)。
我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和激励任务来确定青春期的外显症状是否与通过奖励线索或奖励交付引起的 VS 募集增强相关。12 名社区招募的患有外显障碍(AED)的青少年和 12 名年龄/性别匹配的对照者对目标进行反应,以赢得或避免失去 0 美元、0.20 美元、1 美元、5 美元或未知金额(范围从 0.20 美元到 5 美元)。
在两个研究对象组中,奖励线索的反应激活了 NAcc(相对于无激励线索),最大的 NAcc 募集是由最大奖励线索引起的。在兴趣体积分析中检测到损失预期 NAcc 信号增加 - 但这种增加仅在研究对象击中目标时发生。与对照组相比,AED 在奖励通知与未能赢得奖励通知之间的线性对比中显示出显著升高的 NAcc 激活。在事后重新分析中,VS 和前扣带皮质的奖励与非奖励结果对比的活动也直接与儿童行为检查表(CBCL)的外显总分(所有受试者)相关,而不是二元诊断。最后,两组都显示出损失通知时右侧脑岛的激活(与避免的损失相对)。
无论是通过问卷进行维度评估,还是通过诊断分类进行评估,外显行为都与对奖励导向行为结果的边缘反应过度相关。这可能是具有外显症状的儿童对实验室奖励交付的行为敏感性的神经生物学特征。有趣的是,未来在更严重的、临床推荐的 AED 中对激励动机加工的研究。